I know there are special cases like skins which do not drop with inscription slots at all, inherent mods that have no inscription counterpart, and certain popular skins which are especially rare to find with inherent mods. I'm not asking about those - it's more of a general question.
Years ago, there seemed little doubt that the overall market put a premium on "good" inherent mods, but I'm wondering if that still holds true. Do you think there are still enough oldschool fans buying gear to support claims that "reasonable fair market value" of an item is higher if it has a desirable inherent mod(s) instead of an inscription slot?
Is it reasonable to tell a guy asking for a PC on, say, an r10 inherent 15^50 Long Sword, that he can easily expect to get more than an inscribable r10 Long Sword and a 15^50 inscription?
______________________________
In my experience ...
- That doesn't often hold true anymore for most martial weapons with r9+
- Staffs with inherent matched 20/20 mods seem like they're probably generally somewhat more valuable than the otherwise identical inscribable version with a 20HCT inscription. It seems like inherent 20/10 staffs may actually be worth the same or less than otherwise identical inscribable staffs.
- Shields with desirable dual inherent mods only seem to be reasonably more valuable at market than an inscribable counterpart for specific skins, so I'm not sure if it's fair to say it's a general trend.
- Wands and foci with desirable dual mods are probably at least somewhat more valuable than inscribable versions. Yet, like shields, it may be as much a function of skin as it is the lack of Inscription: in the info tag.
Thanks in advance for sharing your ideas and opinions!
Cheers,
Luny