I have not played in a while and had thee items in storage. They worth anything?
Firey Zodiac Daggers of warding
Q8
7-17
+15>50 in stance
+7 armor(vs elemental damage)
Sundering Zodiac Acx of Fortitude
Q9
6-28
+15/-5energy
20/20
+30
Both are old school.
Thanks in advance for the info.
PC on Zodiac items
Panko
Panko
I hope the low replies does not mean they are worthless.
SkyFallsInThunder
The axe kinda sucks, but it should get you some 10-15k imo.
Daggers are 30e+ imo, but not sure on how much exactly. Get more opinions.
Daggers are 30e+ imo, but not sure on how much exactly. Get more opinions.
Rushin Roulette
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Panko
I have not played in a while and had thee items in storage. They worth anything?
Firey Zodiac Daggers of warding Q8 7-17 +15>50 in stance+7 armor(vs elemental damage) |
15^50 would be around 20-30e
15>50 maybe 20-30K
-15^Stance also around 40-50K (not really sought after on daggers apart from Collectors I think)
The Axe might go for 10-15K max. But you could always get lucky. The -5e is always a pretty big turn down even though you are guaranteed +15% base damage all the time.
Thanks for the correction End. I left the 15>50 pricing in on the very offchance that one should exist and to highlight the difference between ^ and > . No Idea how I came to think that ^Stance only existed for shields. lol
End
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Rushin Roulette
Not sure what you mean with this... this could be one of 3 different inherrant mods +15% While HP is above 50% (usually depicted by 15^50), +15% While HP is below 50% (This is usually depicted as 15>50) and +15% while in stance which doesnt exist as far as I can remember.
15^50 would be around 20-30e 15>50 maybe 20-30K -15^Stance... priceless  The Axe might go for 10-15K max. But you could always get lucky. The -5e is always a pretty big turn down even though you are guaranteed +15% base damage all the time. |
couple errors here.
although right mostly.
15 under 50 wouldn't exist on a gold (assume of course that this is gold, no real reason to bother putting it up here if it isn't though) I could be braindead from not getting any sleep. but since the range on those is 10-20%. Since gold would be the top 25% of the range that should be 17.5%+ only on golds. Therefore we can pretty much rule this out.
15^50 pricewise I would say a bit higher. not much maybe 35-40e
15^stance. Totally exist. It's the equivilent of a dance with death inscription. If this is the case I would say 50-75k tbh :\
Panko
Thanks for the help, after reading your replies I see the confusion. It is the 15^50 stance. Thanks for all the help everyone.
End
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Panko
Thanks for the help, after reading your replies I see the confusion. It is the 15^50 stance. Thanks for all the help everyone.
|
Panko
Yeah after I posted it and was playing for a while I realized what I did. Its a +15 in stance. Dont know why I kept saying ^50. Sorry about the confusion, I even confused myself. Thanks again.
Internetuser
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by End
couple errors here.
although right mostly. 15 under 50 wouldn't exist on a gold (assume of course that this is gold, no real reason to bother putting it up here if it isn't though) I could be braindead from not getting any sleep. but since the range on those is 10-20%. Since gold would be the top 25% of the range that should be 17.5%+ only on golds. Therefore we can pretty much rule this out. 15^50 pricewise I would say a bit higher. not much maybe 35-40e 15^stance. Totally exist. It's the equivilent of a dance with death inscription. If this is the case I would say 50-75k tbh :\ |