For those of us with characters that were older than when the survivor title got implemented or those who just don't even want to try for that tile, why not make a similar title for accumulated deaths?
Those who have accumulated 1337500 deaths can have legendary corpse or something lol
Death Title!
LadyNilene
End
has been sugested before im sure and I still think its a stupid title that makes gwamm easier and involves going afk while getting killed at a res shrine
Lanier
I dont care if it makes GWAMM easier... it would be pretty awesome to walk around with a legendary corpse title. 
Gennadios
That many deaths would take roughly 3 years of AFK shrining. Good luck.
instanceskiller
hmmm not too sure because of how easy it would be to get the title...but I like the name of the title so...
/signed
/signed
headlesshobbs
I think the max title for this should be "Bring out your dead!"
thunder boy
that would be something pretty cool especially for halloween time lol
Kosar The Cruel
This would be a funny joke title. I'd be all for it as long as it wouldn't count for GWAMM.
MisterB
This has been suggested before. It's not an accomplishment at all. It's easier to acquire than an experience title, and you can easily increase your death count afk. Image below isn't me.
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/y...-t3005892.html
Search turned up this thread as the earliest example of this suggestion, but I didn't look too hard.
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/y...-t3005892.html
Search turned up this thread as the earliest example of this suggestion, but I didn't look too hard.
headlesshobbs
Maybe after seeing that picture, I could re-suggest max title be "You suck at Guild Wars!"
A11Eur0
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MisterB
This has been suggested before. It's not an accomplishment at all. It's easier to acquire than an experience title, and you can easily increase your death count afk. Image below isn't me.
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/y...-t3005892.html Search turned up this thread as the earliest example of this suggestion, but I didn't look too hard. |
End
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by A11Eur0
a build like that with obsidian armor...proof that shinies don't make you good at GW.
|
Marverick
Um you die like once every 4 seconds while afk pet leveling so that's 21600 deaths a day. It would take less than a week to get 135k deaths.
Xenomortis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by End
All proph skills with oldschool interface says hi
|
Regardless, I don't see why anything like this should be implemented.
Gennadios
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Marverick
Um you die like once every 4 seconds while afk pet leveling so that's 21600 deaths a day. It would take less than a week to get 135k deaths.
|
With 3 heroes spamming rez there's just nothing particularly impressive or purposeful with those numbers.
Captain Bulldozer
Another suggestion for a "death" title? Really? Why not suggest an "hours spent online" title, or a "number of failed PuGs" title or even a "number of divorces caused by Guild Wars" title? All of those would be far more original, and more likely to be implemented.
Besides, its been confirmed by anet that they expect no more title adjustments or additions now or in the future. A pitty really, since Kurz/Luxon could still use some tweaking...
Besides, its been confirmed by anet that they expect no more title adjustments or additions now or in the future. A pitty really, since Kurz/Luxon could still use some tweaking...
TomoSojiro
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gennadios
That many deaths would take roughly 3 years of AFK shrining. Good luck. |
As for back on topic: It'd be cool, but who needs more titles :P?
Deviant Angel
We kinda already have a title for this... it's called Legendary Defender of Ascalon.
All joking aside, I don't think a title based on death count makes any sense at all. You want to be rewarded... for failing? It is so easy to kill yourself.
All joking aside, I don't think a title based on death count makes any sense at all. You want to be rewarded... for failing? It is so easy to kill yourself.
X Dr Pepper X
Idk why people are hell bent on not letting new titles being added into the game when GW1's community is built around the ease, speed, efficiency of doing things.
People go out of their way to exploit the metagame with overpowered hero set ups, speed clears, title farms, and PvP gimmick team builds.
Generally, these naysayers are the same people who do such things with their guilds and alliances to exploit and perpetuate the metagame.
That being said, there's a tendency for GWGuru to just reject new titles entirely for the sake of GWAMM being too easy to achieve. In my 5 years of playing GW, I have no idea why a community of players who strive to be as efficient and quick as possible do not want something to be even more so. It seems hypocritical.
It's just a bad idea for a title as it rewards little to no effort put forth by the player. A title should exist because criteria need to be met through effort, strategy, and skill.
Even the titles which are super farmable and extremely easy to get require at least some effort, strategy, and skill.
People go out of their way to exploit the metagame with overpowered hero set ups, speed clears, title farms, and PvP gimmick team builds.
Generally, these naysayers are the same people who do such things with their guilds and alliances to exploit and perpetuate the metagame.
That being said, there's a tendency for GWGuru to just reject new titles entirely for the sake of GWAMM being too easy to achieve. In my 5 years of playing GW, I have no idea why a community of players who strive to be as efficient and quick as possible do not want something to be even more so. It seems hypocritical.
It's just a bad idea for a title as it rewards little to no effort put forth by the player. A title should exist because criteria need to be met through effort, strategy, and skill.
Even the titles which are super farmable and extremely easy to get require at least some effort, strategy, and skill.
Missing HB
Not really a good idea. I mean , sure it's fun , but like many titles , it would get farmed too easily. I will give you 2 examples :
- i remember in Hero Battles people using bots to suicide themselves in order to tank rating. This could be used very easily to get title( even by not using bot in fact , it's very easy...)
- the same way people do LdOa. They lure some mobs on rez shrine then go afk...
- i remember in Hero Battles people using bots to suicide themselves in order to tank rating. This could be used very easily to get title( even by not using bot in fact , it's very easy...)
- the same way people do LdOa. They lure some mobs on rez shrine then go afk...
Mia Clemons
First off, rewarding players for FAILING is just stupid.
Second, there are better ways for the Live team to be spending their time than making joke titles like this.
/notsigned
Second, there are better ways for the Live team to be spending their time than making joke titles like this.
/notsigned
jazilla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mia Clemons
First off, rewarding players for FAILING is just stupid.
Second, there are better ways for the Live team to be spending their time than making joke titles like this. /notsigned |
I Hate Chips
/notsigned
1. Easy to obtain
2. A title for playing bad? Seriously?:/
1. Easy to obtain
2. A title for playing bad? Seriously?:/
Terrible Surgeon
I like the idea. Could fix the problem of going afk on a res shrine by making players invulnerable on res shrines and also incapable of casting/attacking while on a res shrine in pve.
signed/
signed/
Gabriel of Ravn
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Terrible Surgeon
I like the idea. Could fix the problem of going afk on a res shrine by making players invulnerable on res shrines and also incapable of casting/attacking while on a res shrine in pve.
signed/ |
Xenomortis
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Terrible Surgeon
I like the idea. Could fix the problem of going afk on a res shrine by making players invulnerable on res shrines and also incapable of casting/attacking while on a res shrine in pve.
|
Great!
snodaard
/no why would we want a title for being bad? or going afk for ages?
Shayne Hawke
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by End
has been sugested before im sure and I still think its a stupid title that makes gwamm easier and involves going afk while getting killed at a res shrine
|
Closed.