Zaishen 3 mission cap

So with the community dwindling why is there still a Cap on the Zaishen Quests
a) it limits what people can choose to do in a day if they decide that they want to do the Zstuff daily and b) it means that quests that sit in Logs can be revisited. Yes I am aware that they repeat, but for example.. Urgoz bounties Foris Iron toes + a few others have come up lately all of which I have wanted to do and not had the time to do. Surely having maybe a 5 quest cap limit may allow jjust a little bit longer to clear the quests from logs.
It would also mean more chance of people having that quest in the log if someone is asking for help. People are more likely to want to do a quest if they get more than just a point on a title... Idk if its been raised before couldnt find anything on it but 3 quests seems a bit too low IMO... anyone elses thoughts? :/

id sign for this. i like to keep a bounty for when its useful on a weeked (i.e-double xp when skill capping or in eotn/kuz/lux) or keep more then one ZV so i can do chain vanqs or again for the weekend.

I agree 5 would be handy, my work schedule doesn't allow me to log in everyday and do them, sometimes i have to drop 1 to grab a better one.

I don't think holding 5 would hurt.

Yes, this has been brought up before. Increasing the number you can keep in your quest log has been suggested in the Sardilac Sanitarium section of the forums. Unfortunately, upping the limit will not help with finding PUGs to do past Z-stuff because virtually any of the Z-stuff available only has a crowd for it on the day it's given. Today, Tarnished Haven has a pretty good crowd because Alcazia Tangle is the Z-Vanquish. Tomorrow, it'll be a ghost town again. (Same with Imperial Sanctum)

no. with the small community, having fewer options funnels the remaining players.

/not signed

Very good point, there would be less players per bounty, mission, vanquish.

^this.

twelvechars

While the 3 quest limit may not be perfect (players can still do old quests), I'm going with Ximvotn's good point.

It seems you're suggesting here that the limit be raised from three to five, and if you had looked in our suggestion subforum, you should have seen this thread, which is this exact idea.