Closed: PC Emblazoned Defender

Vizi

Vizi

Forge Runner

Join Date: Aug 2009

France

Hey.
Need some help with that shield:

Uninscrip Emblazoned Defender req9 Tacs
+30HP
-2 stance

Thx!

Edit: Thx for answers guys!

Chaos Theory Pvp

Forge Runner

Join Date: Oct 2005

Elite

R/Me

Eh wow nice one 150e+

Swingline

Swingline

Forge Runner

Join Date: Sep 2010

Somewhere far away from you

The Mirror of Reason[SNOW]

W/

150e? nty. not even if it is a q9 emblazoned. tac req and -2 stance is meh. it is a sexy OS shield tho so 80-100e seems fair.

Enchanted Krystal

Enchanted Krystal

Forge Runner

Join Date: Feb 2011

In a Kurzick retirement village, reminiscing about Magmas shields......

GW1 ???oo ???ugs ???lan [?????????] ~ GW2 Teh Academy [PhD]

D/Me

I agree with Swingline, 80-100e is more likely.

And I personally think it's a horrid skin, sorry to say.

Vizi

Vizi

Forge Runner

Join Date: Aug 2009

France

Bump!
Thanks to all of you!

Jason Xll

Jason Xll

Banned

Join Date: Sep 2005

Ice Tooth Cave

W/Mo

Yea 150e is excessive, 80e sounds about right.

Chaos Theory Pvp

Forge Runner

Join Date: Oct 2005

Elite

R/Me

I thought people liked this skin! gee I am normal after all 100e is still a nice amount

Swingline

Swingline

Forge Runner

Join Date: Sep 2010

Somewhere far away from you

The Mirror of Reason[SNOW]

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaos Theory Pvp View Post
I thought people liked this skin! gee I am normal after all 100e is still a nice amount
Of course people like it and its rare, but -2 stance with tactics just kills the value of it and most other shields from what they would be if it was instead str req or -2 ench. Its all about how useful a shield will be in most builds. Its unlikely a monk or ele will be carrying this shield through general pve with a stance constantly active.