150e? nty. not even if it is a q9 emblazoned. tac req and -2 stance is meh. it is a sexy OS shield tho so 80-100e seems fair.
Enchanted Krystal
Forge Runner
Join Date: Feb 2011
In a Kurzick retirement village, reminiscing about Magmas shields......
GW1 ???oo ???ugs ???lan [?????????] ~ GW2 Teh Academy [PhD]
D/Me
12 Nov 2011 at 09:47 - 4
I agree with Swingline, 80-100e is more likely.
And I personally think it's a horrid skin, sorry to say.
Vizi
Forge Runner
Join Date: Aug 2009
France
14 Nov 2011 at 17:25 - 5
Bump!
Thanks to all of you!
Jason Xll
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2005
Ice Tooth Cave
W/Mo
14 Nov 2011 at 18:59 - 6
Yea 150e is excessive, 80e sounds about right.
Chaos Theory Pvp
Forge Runner
Join Date: Oct 2005
Elite
R/Me
14 Nov 2011 at 21:15 - 7
I thought people liked this skin! gee I am normal after all 100e is still a nice amount
Swingline
Forge Runner
Join Date: Sep 2010
Somewhere far away from you
The Mirror of Reason[SNOW]
W/
15 Nov 2011 at 01:07 - 8
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaos Theory Pvp
I thought people liked this skin! gee I am normal after all 100e is still a nice amount
Of course people like it and its rare, but -2 stance with tactics just kills the value of it and most other shields from what they would be if it was instead str req or -2 ench. Its all about how useful a shield will be in most builds. Its unlikely a monk or ele will be carrying this shield through general pve with a stance constantly active.