Quote:
Originally Posted by Whatway
Gameplay (mechanics) and graphics are my gripes with GW2 at present. It's way too similar to existing mmorpgs and I'm disappointed that Anet chose that route instead of continue the path of GW1. Graphics are a complete disappointment for a game that took as long as this one has to develop and one set for a late 2012 release; several people in the beta commented likewise. Both of these were common issues cited on their forums during and immediately after the beta.
|
In terms of graphics, while the technology being used isn't bleeding edge the aesthetic look of the game is really good - and lets not forget the client is DX9 only at the moment, it will receive DX10/DX11 support.
Additionally I prefer to judge graphics on their own absolute merits instead of taking in consideration how long it took to get them, especially since the game has been in development for 5 years but not because of the graphics.
It will still be pretty much superior to any other MMORPG out there graphic wise, with the exception of TERA, which has a worse art style IMO. Towns are just awesome.
And the physics engine is quite good.
Game play wise I had a blast - being able to play it almost as TPS, the fluidity of the combat, using skills and move, the AI wasn't a walkover (especially as you go up in levels and fight AI with more skills that acutally dodge). Combat felt like action combat and very satisfying.
And dynamic events are clearly not something similar to other MMORPGs out there.
Finally the world felt alive and it clearly plays more as a multiplayer game than GW without having the hassle associated with forming a party.
PvP is also very good.
On the downside, I dislike the mobs respawns out of nowhere (I much prefer when they come out of that corner or a bush) and I much preferred the mobs patrol style of GW over the mobs just standing around.
I miss the mission map and I would prefer if the compass was able to show the enemies, plus some people rally enjoyed the ability to follow.
We will have to give it some time - some people say GW is awful and they actually didn't even left the pre-searing, so not everything is for everyone, although I got the impression some GW veterans are just dismissing it by just looking it at the surface and seeing some similarities to WoW and the fact it will be a bigger game population wise (curiously WoW players focus on what is different, from loading screens, to no raids, to no treadmill gear, to no holy trinity) without digging deeper.
----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mintha Syl
Especially counting how many free similar games there's out there and how many I'm playing already, gw included. Let's put it like this: if I was rich, both of money and time, and was really getting bored, then I could give it a try, yeah :P
|
Please do tell what games offer everything or even most of the things GW2 offer for free - I'm very interested in playing those games.
And by the way the GW box price was quite similar to the GW2 box price.