Ectos price, and why is people acting this way?

oscarmk

oscarmk

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Nov 2005

Hello,

As many of you have noticed the price for ectos has been dropping really badly the last few days. What i dont understand, is why would someone be so dumb to try to sell more than 50 ectos?. I am sorry but this is just plain retarded, and its what is brining the price down. Im guessing nobody of those took economics at all. If you have many ectos, and you try to sell them, they will only drop in price even more, hence the logical thing to do is NOT SELL THEM like its the end of the world, so they become more valuable.

I personally only have 2 ectos atm, so i dont really care about the price, but seriouslly i just cant understand why would someone with many ectos try to sell them, and make the price go down. Someone help me understand, because this doesnt make any sense.

sno

sno

Look into the Eye.

Join Date: Oct 2005

Detroit, Mi

Oh No Not These Guys [uhoh]

Mo/

because the general consensus is that the prices will continue falling since people won't want them after ch2 comes out (thats the idea anyways.) People would rather get rid of theirs at 7k than wait 2 months and get 3k for them.

Banebow

Banebow

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Aug 2005

[KoA] Knights of the Alliance

Me/

Those people who have not taken a single course in economics, as you would claim, are the ones who, at the end of the day, will have the money. If we pretend for a moment that you have 50 ectos, what are you going to do? You see the price dropping every day, you see your "nest egg" as it were, going down in value every day. Shall you hold on to that nest egg, in the fools hope that prices will magically rise again, or will you sell?

As you say, the more people who sell ectos the lower the price goes. But when you don't know if joe from next door is going to hold his ectos or sell them when he can still make some money, you play it safe, and make some money. As Sno said, the general consensus is that ectos will continue to fall. A self-fulfilling prophecy if that is how you need to think about it, but we can be fairly sure that ectos will continue to fall.

saphir

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Jun 2005

doa

Mo/

i never did understand the people who hoarded ectos lol
there never seemed to be much purpose to have gold in this game, except to stare at and croon over or something..

like real life, the more you have the more you spend for some people.
i always bought up rubies and sapphires as i always thought they were undervalued. i mean, look at how often they drop compared to ectos. even their inherent "value" in gold is 2.5x that of ecto.

ah well, i don't really need gold, but i do like gemstones =)

oscarmk

oscarmk

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Nov 2005

Well people are rich mainly because they played this from day one or close to it, which is actually REALLY important at least in this game ive noticed(which is retarded), or they just play it too much, not because they are smart.

Also why wont ppl want them for ch 2 that makes no sense to me. In addition because the max gold you can hold is 100k, ectos are necessary, as there are way too many things that are priced over 100k, and the only way to buy them is to have 100 k and ectos. Now this one is key, now if it isnt ectos, something WILL have to raise, unless the maximum money you can hold is no longer 100k and is several millions, as ive seen stuff such as a req 8 str 30 life -2 stance shield go for 500 ectos.

Dmitri3

Dmitri3

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Jul 2005

Canada, almost got to see a polar bear... :P

"Gaile Gray: Hold your ectos: they are still useful!"
Either it's a message thrown out by Gaile to stop ectos from dropping in value or it means there's gonna be fix/update on them.

Ghost Recon

Ghost Recon

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jun 2005

Mo/

Well i donno but by gaile message it tells me that:Fissure armour will still be more "rarer" than the new armour (More desirable, the new armour will be more desirable at first but people will go back to fissure armour) The new armour in the expansion needs ecto :S (I don't see this happening at ALL!) Maybe a new armour in UW or something like that?
I would say hold on to them anyways prices will rise again.

Eternal Archaon

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Jan 2006

Mo/W

I say:

Concentrate on getting 1000k in your storage first then store your ectos and stones. I see no use in buying new weapons right now or buying anything for that matter and gold is the most reliable source of money (obviously).

Murder In China

Murder In China

Banned

Join Date: Sep 2005

/B/Chan

Looking for one

W/

Ectos have dropped, IMO, from the free zoning into "The Underworld" in the Old Tombs of the Primeval Kings area.

Those monsters there can drop ectos so you don't have to pay 1k in order to have a chance to get an ecto or any of those etheral items.

fiery

fiery

Banned

Join Date: Oct 2005

maryland

InYurFace Gaming [IYF]

R/

Quote:
and its what is brining the price down yup the new PVE Tombs drops them

Loviatar

Underworld Spelunker

Join Date: Feb 2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost Recon
Well i donno but by gaile message it tells me that: [*]Fissure armour will still be more "rarer" than the new armour (More desirable, the new armour will be more desirable at first but people will go back to fissure armour)
. unless you are employed by Anet and are breaking the NDA you have no idea of...

how much better the new armor will appeal to people

how rare it will be

or how much of a status symbol any of the new items will be.

in other words people saving for fissure armor may say forget fissure this is what i must have.

nobody knows (not me not you)

Banebow

Banebow

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Aug 2005

[KoA] Knights of the Alliance

Me/

Quote:
Originally Posted by oscarmk
Well people are rich mainly because they played this from day one or close to it
I have been playing since day two, and I am not even close to rich. It is the farmers who are rich, not those that got to play early on. Oh, they had it easier, but you can still get rich, even now.

Quote: Originally Posted by Eternal Archaon Concentrate on getting 1000k in your storage first then store your ectos and stones. I see no use in buying new weapons right now or buying anything for that matter and gold is the most reliable source of money (obviously). Personaly, I prefer to have the actual gold on hand, not the "stock" that is ectoplasm. After all, stocks can rise and fall, but my gold will always buy that salvage kit, or pay the entrance into fissure of woe, so I agree with you. If you are saving for fissure armor fine, but don't save with ectoplasms, save with gold.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghost Recon
Fissure armour will still be more "rarer" than the new armour (More desirable, the new armour will be more desirable at first but people will go back to fissure armour) Perhaps. Gems are rumored to be receiving a use at some point, so a new "rare" set of armor may be planned. Certainly players think so, rubies and sapphires were, last I checked, above ectos in price. Me, I still plan on a set of fissure armor. Why? Because it is the first "rare" armor in the game, and will be so no matter how many chapters ANet releases. And because everyone is going to rush to get the new armors for that unique look, but then everyone will have the new armor, and no one will have exactly what they wanted (a unique looking character). The same cannot be said for fissure armor though, so I see were you are coming from about it being rarer, though I would keep in mind that another "rare" set of armor may be in chapter two. Certainly the players who only buy chapter two are going to want a goal to work towards, are they not?

Skuld

Skuld

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Sep 2005

Thousend Tigers Apund Ur Head [Ttgr]

A/

From a selfish view I want it to drop, I'm hoping to get a fissure helmet for my warrior before chapter 2

oscarmk

oscarmk

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Nov 2005

Oh i didnt know gems were totally useless atm.

Markaedw

Markaedw

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Nov 2005

N/

Speaking of rare, I think that I will stick with my "plain old" desert collectors armor, I have never seen another ranger wearing it.