Ok my grammer isnt the best but check this out

Ok im no whiz in the grammer department but I think somethings up here.

It can be properly worded,
"...if it hits and causes target foe..."

or,
"...if it hits, causing target foe..."

Also, it's grammar. Grammer is a company that makes seats for vehicles.

haha like I said not my best spot d=

Read some of the assassin and ritualist skills.

English sounds funny.

To get super technical it should be: "if it hits, and causes..." or "if it hits, causing..."

I believe it is worded right since in English there can't be a comma in front of "and" as far as I know, but it would also work if they made it "if it hits, causing..."

In English there can't be a comma in front of and?! You mean after "and" methinks.

or what about "if it hits, it will also cause..."?

Quote: Originally Posted by berko I believe it is worded right since in English there can't be a comma in front of "and" as far as I know, but it would also work if they made it "if it hits, causing..." Yes there can, example;

Person 1: Hey I got a new Mobile today!
Person 2: And, what's your point?

Wasn't it originally, or it should be: ?

Target foe is struck for X cold damage and moves 66% slower for X seconds.

Ok, yes there can be, but in this case it's not really necessary and to me it makes perfect sense.
or maybe I should put...........................not really necessary, and to me it makes perfect sense.(?)


Some research:
http://www.getitwriteonline.com/archive/020204.htm
http://dictionary.reference.com/help...e/c/comma.html
http://www.getitwriteonline.com/archive/021201.htm

Oh and Josh.....in your example, the comma is after "and" which is not what I meant.
Sorry for any misunderstanding guys, I really didn't mean to upset anyone, just trying to post my opinion.

Quote: Originally Posted by berko

Quick! Someone bring in Tyria's Union of English Teachers! LOL

Here's another one that slipped past the proofreaders:

lets be honest they just got it blatently wrong! I loved the last one btw thanks for that

onlyable, looks like george w. is also trying to take over the gaming industry with his commander and chief powers

Quote: Originally Posted by Lady Lozza Hate to disappoint you, but if you speak English (as opposed to Microsoft Speak) then a comma MUST BE USED IN LISTING. Not using a comma implies grouping. For example:

2) I received a letter, and a parcel and bill.
-> I received a letter, I received a parcel and bill
This construction (grouping) means that the bill was received with the pacel and is associated with it. Actually there's no MUST about it, it's purely conditional. The comma before the final 'and' in a list is only used to avoid confusion in certain structures. It's perfectly acceptable to omit it provided there's no ambiguity. The main thing that implies grouping in your sentence is the fact the first two items were preceeded with "I receieved a" and the third wasn't.

A better example would be: "I received a letter and a parcel and a bill". The ambiguity there would be that you could group any two of these or all three together. The sentence "I received a letter, and a parcel and a bill" would suggest the second two are grouped. You could also group the second two by omiting the 'a' from 'a bill', as in "I received a letter and a parcel and bill".

i dont see anything wrong...


(i failed english XD)

Holy dead threads, Batman!

Jesus I completely forgot about this...