Click on thumbnails for the 1024x768 size versions if you want to see them bigger (dial-up users beware, full size pics run from 150kb-350kb - was trying not to compress them too much. At least I sized them down from 1600x1200, heh)
Just another 'personal album' thread
1 pages • Page 1
R
Sure are a lot of these guys in Reed/The Fall....
http://crazypuma.com/images/guildwars/gw-0085b.jpg
http://crazypuma.com/images/guildwars/gw-0086b.jpg
http://crazypuma.com/images/guildwars/gw-0083b.jpg
http://crazypuma.com/images/guildwars/gw-0084b.jpg
http://crazypuma.com/images/guildwars/gw-0085b.jpg
http://crazypuma.com/images/guildwars/gw-0086b.jpg
http://crazypuma.com/images/guildwars/gw-0083b.jpg
http://crazypuma.com/images/guildwars/gw-0084b.jpg
(was going to post this in the above post but 4 images + a url seems to count as 'too many images in a post...)
I made the above shots low-res for loading.
If for some reason you want them higer-res all my GW screenshots are now/will be put here, including the occasional one I may still post on the forum: (Edit: Link changed. Click here.
I made the above shots low-res for loading.
If for some reason you want them higer-res all my GW screenshots are now/will be put here, including the occasional one I may still post on the forum: (Edit: Link changed. Click here.A
Quote:
Last edited by Dreamsmith : Today at 09:48 AM. Reason: Changed IMG tags to URL tages. Don't directly include images wider than 600 pixels, please.
I find it a bit annoying that I seem to have been singled out for editing of posted images wider than 600, when this ENTIRE forum is populated with numerous pictures much wider than 600 pixels, that I have never seen edited out, from large to small threads.
I have nothing against a such a rule - if it is enforced with enough visible consistency (obviously it's hard to enforce such a rule ALL the time) to be shown that the rule is definitely 'serious' - but this feels unfair.
Cheers.
I have nothing against a such a rule - if it is enforced with enough visible consistency (obviously it's hard to enforce such a rule ALL the time) to be shown that the rule is definitely 'serious' - but this feels unfair.
Cheers.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatLady
That particularly, to me, feels like hypocrisy AND feels like I was singled out for some personal reason, and I just had to say so. If it gets me banned or something for disagreeing with a mod in public, so be it.
Unfortunately, the moderating team here at Guild Wars Guru is spread rather thin and many things slip by unnoticed. The best thing to do in this situation is to click on the "forum leaders" link on the front page and PM an appropriate moderator.
I have just been to that thread and fixed it as I was looking through. Rest assured, you have not been singled out.
I have just been to that thread and fixed it as I was looking through. Rest assured, you have not been singled out.
Quote:
The best thing to do in this situation is to click on the "forum leaders" link on the front page and PM an appropriate moderator.
Yes, I did that as well.
And thank you for the sticky about image size. One reason for my irritation is I saw no such indicated rule in this forum or in the 'Guild Auditorium' guidelines.
And thank you for the sticky about image size. One reason for my irritation is I saw no such indicated rule in this forum or in the 'Guild Auditorium' guidelines.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CatLady
And thank you for the sticky about image size. One reason for my irritation is I saw no such indicated rule in this forum or in the 'Guild Auditorium' guidelines.
Yeah, I thought I should put it up there. Should save the few moderators we have a lot of leg-work. 