What are more fun or better in UW?

sid00

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Jan 2006

Caliber-Inc

W/Mo

I have been trying to decide on a build for UW. I can't decide weather to go with as a monk primary or necromance as the primary. Can you guys help ease my decision. The search engine doesn't work

RaabTheGuru

RaabTheGuru

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Feb 2006

Southern California

Wizards Anomyous [WoA]

N/Me

I've gone as both. To me, necromancer primary is much harder but more fun in my opinion. Monk primary can be fun also, but either way, both will become less appealing over time.

Kinroan

Kinroan

Academy Page

Join Date: Nov 2005

Newport, NC USA

ANT

N/Me

Well...let me tell you from my experience, I think a necro is many many times funner to play, but unless you're SS or MM, its almost impossible to find a group near the end...and as some1 who has fun with Blood, it gets a bit annoying. While on the other side, a monk, in my humble opinion, is boring, but there's always a market for monks in any mission.

koneko

Site Contributor

Join Date: Sep 2005

38??16′ N 140??52′ E

Mo/Me

Monk: easy to find a group; harder (constant attention to the party), less fun (OMG OMG OMG REZ REZ REZ REZ REZ HEZALZ0R NOW U NOOB)
Necromancer: hard(er) to find a group; commonly delegated as the "support" character in groups (Monk: My Energy is 0 of 52 My Energy is 0 of 52 My Energy is 0 of 52 BIP BIP BIP NOW); a little bit more fun (?)