Windows Vista Delayed Until 2007
Old Dood
Bummer...Looks like Vista will not be out until the first quarter of 2007.
Mainly due to Microsoft making sure the security is set. Well we can thank all the hackers over the years for that...
EDIT: I should add this really doesn't bother me all that much...it means I have more time now before I buy a new computer. I would rahter wait until later 2007 anyways so they can get out a Service Pack for any bugs...hehehe. But I am looking forward to a new Operating System. From what I understand is you will need a whole new animal of video cards to get High-Def out of Vista. Other more Geeky people can explain that better then I.
Mainly due to Microsoft making sure the security is set. Well we can thank all the hackers over the years for that...
EDIT: I should add this really doesn't bother me all that much...it means I have more time now before I buy a new computer. I would rahter wait until later 2007 anyways so they can get out a Service Pack for any bugs...hehehe. But I am looking forward to a new Operating System. From what I understand is you will need a whole new animal of video cards to get High-Def out of Vista. Other more Geeky people can explain that better then I.
EternalTempest
I saw that
Nov for Corp Volume License (who are usually NOT the 1st to adapt to a new product) Jan for public.
Do agree. To get HD out of Vista you have to have a video card that supports HDCP (high def copy protection) then hook it up to a moniter that also supports HDCP. Cards just NOW are coming with this feature.
Ati made a blunder and stated several cards (as selling points) had HDCP enable but the reality was they were missing a crypto chip that had to be on the card (no firmware hacks) aka it didn't work. Example: You have a video card with a TV turner card but no ports on it and it was sold has having a TV Turner.
Nov for Corp Volume License (who are usually NOT the 1st to adapt to a new product) Jan for public.
Do agree. To get HD out of Vista you have to have a video card that supports HDCP (high def copy protection) then hook it up to a moniter that also supports HDCP. Cards just NOW are coming with this feature.
Ati made a blunder and stated several cards (as selling points) had HDCP enable but the reality was they were missing a crypto chip that had to be on the card (no firmware hacks) aka it didn't work. Example: You have a video card with a TV turner card but no ports on it and it was sold has having a TV Turner.
Old Dood
So my Nice cool UltraSharp Dell monitor(2001FP 20.1") is NOT able to do the HDCP? THAT will really irritate me greatly. I can understand the Video Card...I was expecting to purchase a new one with my next system anyways...but ANOTHER monitor....*sigh*
EternalTempest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Dood
So my Nice cool UltraSharp Dell monitor(2001FP 20.1") is NOT able to do the HDCP? THAT will really irritate me greatly. I can understand the Video Card...I was expecting to purchase a new one with my next system anyways...but ANOTHER monitor....*sigh*
|
How it works if you are playing HD content, both Blue-Ray, HD-DVD, future digital cable will check to so if you have HDCP working correctly.
If it detect's it doesn't the content owner can choose (when it's created)
A) Doesn't Play
B) Plays at lower quality
C) Plays normal
Oh DVI cables (big thick ones can't support HDCP), only HDMI cables (look similiar to USB can support it).
koneko
/waits for new MacBook Pro
More about HDCP:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDCP
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/..._hdcp_support/
I stopped caring about "high defintion" and all that newfangled stuff. I'm more than perfectly content with the computer (and video card and LCD - both of which will not be playing Blu-Ray/HD-DVD content).
More about HDCP:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDCP
http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/..._hdcp_support/
I stopped caring about "high defintion" and all that newfangled stuff. I'm more than perfectly content with the computer (and video card and LCD - both of which will not be playing Blu-Ray/HD-DVD content).
EternalTempest
Quote:
Originally Posted by koneko
/waits for new MacBook Pro
More about HDCP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDCP http://www.firingsquad.com/hardware/..._hdcp_support/ I stopped caring about "high defintion" and all that newfangled stuff. I'm more than perfectly content with the computer (and video card and LCD - both of which will not be playing Blu-Ray/HD-DVD content). |
Teklord
I'll be sticking with DVD simply because I doubt my 1 year old HDTV supports this HDCP crap. As for my computers, I don't watch Movies or TV on them anyway so that won't be an issue.
This HDCP stuff reminds me of the Trusted Computing thing with the Fritz Chip thing.
Oh well, no matter what they do there will always be someone somewhere that will find a way around it.
This HDCP stuff reminds me of the Trusted Computing thing with the Fritz Chip thing.
Oh well, no matter what they do there will always be someone somewhere that will find a way around it.
Loviatar
neither my monitor or video card support that junk so i will simply play whack a pengu to let off steam.
Dood hi
did you ever play the version with blood and landmines?
my best was 7 mines in a row
Dood hi
did you ever play the version with blood and landmines?
my best was 7 mines in a row
Loviatar
neither my monitor or video card support that junk so i will simply play whack a pengu to let off steam.
Dood hi
did you ever play the version with blood and landmines?
my best was 7 mines in a row
http://kontraband.com/show/show.asp?...AT=games&NSFW=
Dood hi
did you ever play the version with blood and landmines?
my best was 7 mines in a row
http://kontraband.com/show/show.asp?...AT=games&NSFW=
EternalTempest
Quote:
Originally Posted by Teklord
I'll be sticking with DVD simply because I doubt my 1 year old HDTV supports this HDCP crap. As for my computers, I don't watch Movies or TV on them anyway so that won't be an issue.
This HDCP stuff reminds me of the Trusted Computing thing with the Fritz Chip thing. Oh well, no matter what they do there will always be someone somewhere that will find a way around it. |
Content owner's on the verge of having the population revolt on them with all this DRM / Copy protection the way there adding this junk to everything. They already created a full pirate generation that expect everything to be free.
Once HDCP goes in to affect and if they stop the signal due to one device not HDCP complaint, there going to get a lot of hate mail.
Xenrath
My first PC was a 4mb RAM, 486 SX 25Mhz with a 1mb tseng labs SVGA card. I upgraded it to an epic 105 MB hard disk.
With that, I had Windows 3.11, Doom (plus 50Mb worth of mods), Word for Windows 2.0, Paintshop Pro, plus things like Turbo C++ for my uni courses, and still had room to spare.
Fast forward to the future, you get to install bloatware crap that takes up 100 GB, needs more and more... and more and more... and some more resources, and pay hundreds of $$$ to do.... EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS! (ok not including games/graphics cards, that's another topic altogether)
Yay for monopolies.... sigh.
With that, I had Windows 3.11, Doom (plus 50Mb worth of mods), Word for Windows 2.0, Paintshop Pro, plus things like Turbo C++ for my uni courses, and still had room to spare.
Fast forward to the future, you get to install bloatware crap that takes up 100 GB, needs more and more... and more and more... and some more resources, and pay hundreds of $$$ to do.... EXACTLY THE SAME THINGS! (ok not including games/graphics cards, that's another topic altogether)
Yay for monopolies.... sigh.
Sam Stormwind
I just looked at sum videos of hd video cards and they blew my mind really close to real life. WHen vista and hd video cards come out i guess ill jsut buy a whole set from dell or sumthin with omitor graphics and video card all hd.
mathewthegreat
Thing that concerns me greatly about this vista bullshit is temperatures its going to create...your graphics card is going to be constantly under load.
Loviatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathewthegreat
Thing that concerns me greatly about this vista bullshit is temperatures its going to create...your graphics card is going to be constantly under load.
|
dont sweat it
koneko
Quote:
Originally Posted by EternalTempest
I sticking with DVD until they may be a clear winner or the Anime (Adv, Bandai, Funmation, etc) companies choose a format.. (I don't see them splintering)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xenrath
My first PC was a 4mb RAM, 486 SX 25Mhz with a 1mb tseng labs SVGA card. I upgraded it to an epic 105 MB hard disk.
With that, I had Windows 3.11, Doom (plus 50Mb worth of mods), Word for Windows 2.0, Paintshop Pro, plus things like Turbo C++ for my uni courses, and still had room to spare. |
Wow, that brought back a lot of memories...
Viva la resistance
BellyFlop
Quote:
Bummer...Looks like Vista will not be out until the first quarter of 2007. |
EternalTempest
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathewthegreat
Thing that concerns me greatly about this vista bullshit is temperatures its going to create...your graphics card is going to be constantly under load.
|
j0j081
The graphics card isn't going to be under full load probably not even 1/3 load so I wouldn't worry about temps too much. The new interface is designed with high end cards in mind or at least high end by today's standards, not by 2007s. So if you card at that time can't keep up there will be a way to change the interface anyway.
EternalTempest
There cards and system know that will be running a bit hot that show the official "Windows Vista Ready Logo" on them, inculding some modern cards now.
Cottage Pie
Exactly how long do any of us spend looking at the windows GUI? when my PC is loaded up i'm either right into a game, Open Office or watching something off usenet...This windows Vista uber high rez sounds like bollocks, this really is the thin end of the consumer marketing wedge where we're not getting value for money anymore.
I want an OS that's 100% stable, efficient, secure and compatible, just 1% of those in trade for good looks is too much, imo...Vista sounds 1% efficient though...
I want an OS that's 100% stable, efficient, secure and compatible, just 1% of those in trade for good looks is too much, imo...Vista sounds 1% efficient though...
mathewthegreat
Id rather they just release it than put some new digital rights management in it
Omega X
Quote:
Originally Posted by mathewthegreat
Id rather they just release it than put some new digital rights management in it
|
But remember, you don't HAVE to use the DRM junk. Personally, I will never use DRM anything anytime soon.
Seef II
Damn, looks like I have to put off my Conroe upgrade till then.
oh well, prices will drop!
oh well, prices will drop!
Tachyon
Then there's these little points about Vista!
A CHAP who managed to sneak a peek at the Vole's internal beta version 2 of Windows 53xx informed us that, even while idling, Vista eats as much as 800Mb of system memory.
Yeah, we were shocked too, but you have to believe the screenshot below.
Memory manufacturers couldn't be happier about that, as it will make people to go out and buy more memory. Our source reported that Vista runs ok with 1024Mb of system memory but no-doubt 2048Mb would be much better.
Vista won't install on FAT32 partitions, it only likes NTFS partitions. We also know that the system performs quite well on an Athlon 4000+ and a Geforce 7800 GTX 512 works just fine in the mix. Aero glass looks good, we liked it when we first clapped eyes on Beta 1 version.
Vista occupies roughly three times more space than Windows XP. In fact, it'll require up to a whopping seven gigabytes of drive space.
Have a butcher's:
RECENTLY we managed to spend some time using a Vista machine. The machine had Athlon 4000+ and 2 GB of memory with Geforce 7800 GTX card. We installed a game and we didn’t have anything else than Far Cry at the moment. We wanted to check how much memory you actually will need to play games on Vista. We know it is a beta, but it will at least give you a feeling what could you expect from the final one. We moved the community with our story where we said you need up to 800 MB memory just to run Vista. You can read it here and we have to say that we do know the difference between page file and the actual physical memory, but trust me you need 1GB memory just to work in Word or Paint using vista. People were claiming that the machine used 400MB of physical memory but it will work like a beaten horse with 512MB. It works slow even with 2GB.
Here is another cool shot for you. You can clearly see that you need more than 1GB of memory to run the game. Far Cry is not that an intensive game, and we ended up with 1.23 GB page file and you can see that we are running a single instance of Explorer and a task manager.
I have a fear of FEAR the game as it will eat significantly more than Far Cry. We FEAR that you might need even more than 2GB as FEAR of already wants 2GB memory under Windows XP. It works with 1GB as well but it works better with 2GB, and so does the Battlefield 2. We are sure that you will soon be able to buy 4GB gaming kits, at least by the end of the year when Vista gets closer.
Links to the articles!
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30128
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30503
A CHAP who managed to sneak a peek at the Vole's internal beta version 2 of Windows 53xx informed us that, even while idling, Vista eats as much as 800Mb of system memory.
Yeah, we were shocked too, but you have to believe the screenshot below.
Memory manufacturers couldn't be happier about that, as it will make people to go out and buy more memory. Our source reported that Vista runs ok with 1024Mb of system memory but no-doubt 2048Mb would be much better.
Vista won't install on FAT32 partitions, it only likes NTFS partitions. We also know that the system performs quite well on an Athlon 4000+ and a Geforce 7800 GTX 512 works just fine in the mix. Aero glass looks good, we liked it when we first clapped eyes on Beta 1 version.
Vista occupies roughly three times more space than Windows XP. In fact, it'll require up to a whopping seven gigabytes of drive space.
Have a butcher's:
RECENTLY we managed to spend some time using a Vista machine. The machine had Athlon 4000+ and 2 GB of memory with Geforce 7800 GTX card. We installed a game and we didn’t have anything else than Far Cry at the moment. We wanted to check how much memory you actually will need to play games on Vista. We know it is a beta, but it will at least give you a feeling what could you expect from the final one. We moved the community with our story where we said you need up to 800 MB memory just to run Vista. You can read it here and we have to say that we do know the difference between page file and the actual physical memory, but trust me you need 1GB memory just to work in Word or Paint using vista. People were claiming that the machine used 400MB of physical memory but it will work like a beaten horse with 512MB. It works slow even with 2GB.
Here is another cool shot for you. You can clearly see that you need more than 1GB of memory to run the game. Far Cry is not that an intensive game, and we ended up with 1.23 GB page file and you can see that we are running a single instance of Explorer and a task manager.
I have a fear of FEAR the game as it will eat significantly more than Far Cry. We FEAR that you might need even more than 2GB as FEAR of already wants 2GB memory under Windows XP. It works with 1GB as well but it works better with 2GB, and so does the Battlefield 2. We are sure that you will soon be able to buy 4GB gaming kits, at least by the end of the year when Vista gets closer.
Links to the articles!
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30128
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30503