Me, I have one thing that totally makes me feel happy about this game:
Archers are like Legolas in the movies, they never run out of arrows

Anyone else?
SOT
FluidFox
Aaaaagh
SOT
Originally Posted by FluidFox
The monk dance is exactly how I told them it should be.
|
SOT
Originally Posted by Aaaaagh
Yeah, I could go on for a long time, but Im pretty lazy so I wont.
A few things though: This is an entirely enjoyable game, with VERY few flaws/bugs. Amazing release, I have never seen such a smooth release. Exceptional balance between pve and pvp. Fabulous content, brilliant story line. Superior graphics and wonderful game play. Really, I could go on...sound, A+...trying to stop...uniqueness unreal! Ahh! stop! Just imagine, this is only the begining... I think to all the other mmo type games, and when you look at where they were at release, and where they end up down the road--well its always amazing. This game has the most potential of any game I have EVER seen. |
liuzg
Ordas
Originally Posted by liuzg
Actually Anarchy Online is only free until January next year,it is more like a promotion.
|
SOT
Wesley Wyndam-Pryce
Originally Posted by Ordas
just a last attempt to populate a dying world. The graphics on that game are SOOO old. its painful to look @ after games like GW.
|
Xellos
DrSLUGFly
Ramus
Originally Posted by Wesley Wyndam-Pryce
AO has to be the worst coded engine ever.
In an instance in GW, my frames are fairly good for a real low end PC. In a full town, sure it's fps lagged to hell cause of the 100+ people but it still looks great. AO, a town with very few people gets me the same fps a full town in GW gives me, and thats with all of AO's settings turned on the lowest.... When I get better graphics and frame rates on a game many years newer... Plus the product placement in AO is just stupid. I really liked walking into a town area and seeing a sign for Verzion DSL service ![]() |
Vanquisher
Numa Pompilius
Storn
Originally Posted by Numa Pompilius
What drew me to this game was the graphics - it's the best graphics in any present game, on any platform; it beats HalfLife2, Far Cry and Doom3 IMO - but what's kept me is the gameplay. It's a good game.
I'm not really in to MMORPGs but there's few good single-player rpg's for PC nowadays, so I started looking at the MMORPG scene. Some I could scratch immediately because their content didn't interest me, but some seemed interesting. I briefly tried A Tale In The Desert, and was bored to tears. It's vaguely interesting to make bricks and farm crops for a while, but basically ATITD is an egypt-themed graphical chatroom. With hardly any people in it. I looked at World of Warcraft and decided I *hated* the low-spec cutesy console graphics. It may possibly be a good game but the ugly graphics kill it for me. It's like what Jules says in Pulp Fiction: rats may taste like pumpkin pie, but i'm not gonna eat the filthy motherf-----s. I sortof liked the graphics of Everquest 2, so I tried it, and found that it was, well, bland. It wasn't truly bad, it was just dull quests for no particular reason with a lot of people just standing around all over the place. I'm also not into socializing, and EQ2 forces grouping to do anything. Then I saw screenshots of GW and knew I had to have it. I consider it $50 well spent. The game is definitely a lot less buggy than Everquest2, the devs respond to problems quickly, the community is as far as I've encountered no worse than that in Everquest2 or your average FPS, and the quests and content if anything better than Everquest2. PS: the _warrior_ dance is exactly as it should be. |
Madjik
Zoelef
Korgy
Celes Tial
Sakura
DismalClown
SOT