Im the best Class because I do the most damage
Ollj
= Youre stupid because damage is by far not everything!
comon situation:
Paladin: "Warriormonks are the best, because they deal the most damage"
Me:"How come you always see Paladins that tell others that palladins do most damage and you NEVER see Elementarists that tell others that they can cast the most spells?"
Palladin:"Nont know!"
Me: "Because Elementarists are far more intelligent than Warriors!"
BTW Warriors dont deal the most damage, Elementarists (splash damage), Mesmers (indirect damage), Necros (short time damage boost), Rangers (Damage buffing Satelites) and monks (Smithing adjanced) do!
Did I miss a class?
Just because you dont see numbers on the screen does not mean you dont do damage.
You also in comparison NEVER EVER read:
Mesmer: "I prevent the most Spells to be cast"
Ranger: "I shoot the most arrors to interrupt others actions"
Necro: "I can double our teams Power and ignore physical armor"
Monk: "I can heal (and protect)" (okay, you can hear that quite a lot because Palladins never get tired to ask a monk if it can heal, how stupid is that?)
in the end:
Guild wars is NOT Diabolo2, this game is not just about dealing damage and Warriors are the stupid class
comon situation:
Paladin: "Warriormonks are the best, because they deal the most damage"
Me:"How come you always see Paladins that tell others that palladins do most damage and you NEVER see Elementarists that tell others that they can cast the most spells?"
Palladin:"Nont know!"
Me: "Because Elementarists are far more intelligent than Warriors!"
BTW Warriors dont deal the most damage, Elementarists (splash damage), Mesmers (indirect damage), Necros (short time damage boost), Rangers (Damage buffing Satelites) and monks (Smithing adjanced) do!
Did I miss a class?
Just because you dont see numbers on the screen does not mean you dont do damage.
You also in comparison NEVER EVER read:
Mesmer: "I prevent the most Spells to be cast"
Ranger: "I shoot the most arrors to interrupt others actions"
Necro: "I can double our teams Power and ignore physical armor"
Monk: "I can heal (and protect)" (okay, you can hear that quite a lot because Palladins never get tired to ask a monk if it can heal, how stupid is that?)
in the end:
Guild wars is NOT Diabolo2, this game is not just about dealing damage and Warriors are the stupid class
Haung Yu
Warriors are not stupid. Warrior/Monks are.
LathalDraugr
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ollj
= Youre stupid because damage is by far not everything!
comon situation: Paladin: "Warriormonks are the best, because they deal the most damage" Me:"How come you always see Paladins that tell others that palladins do most damage and you NEVER see Elementarists that tell others that they can cast the most spells?" Palladin:"Nont know!" Me: "Because Elementarists are far more intelligent than Warriors!" BTW Warriors dont deal the most damage, Elementarists (splash damage), Mesmers (indirect damage), Necros (short time damage boost), Rangers (Damage buffing Satelites) and monks (Smithing adjanced) do! Did I miss a class? Just because you dont see numbers on the screen does not mean you dont do damage. You also in comparison NEVER EVER read: Mesmer: "I prevent the most Spells to be cast" Ranger: "I shoot the most arrors to interrupt others actions" Necro: "I can double our teams Power and ignore physical armor" Monk: "I can heal (and protect)" (okay, you can hear that quite a lot because Palladins never get tired to ask a monk if it can heal, how stupid is that?) in the end: Guild wars is NOT Diabolo2, this game is not just about dealing damage and Warriors are the stupid class |
As for "paladins" (not that there is such a thing) asking if monks can heal, it's not such a stupid question given there are plenty of smiting monks out there. And to finish off, classes are not stupid but people who say classes are stupid are.
Zilm
This will turn into a silly pointless thread
Makkert
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zilm
This will turn into a silly pointless thread
|
Burem
I've never seen warriors boasting about their damage anywhere but the boards?
Ninna
town chat can get pretty stupid
but its not limited to damage talk
but its not limited to damage talk
Spyle
Quote:
I've never seen warriors boasting about their damage anywhere but the boards? |
Yawn.
Wonder how he would have felt if I kept boasting how I kept his sorry ass from dying countless times, along with myself and the other 2 party members, while all he had to do was focus on attacking 1 guy at a time.
It just seems that there are more warriors than any other class who feel it necessary to tell their group how awesome they think they are. I think this is just because there are more warriors out their, because they are the only mele main and lots of people like to melee.
I hope they add another main melee class. 4 casters, 1 melee, 1 ranger. Whats up with that.
Rothgar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makkert
*dances the hokey-pokey*
|
Nokomis
Brilliant. All warriors are stupid? Your IQ is showing, pull your skirt down.
--Nokomis
--Nokomis
Haung Yu
Stupid:
1. Slow to learn or understand.
2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
3. Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless.
Now when I said Warrior/Monks are stupid, I don't exactly mean any of the definations mentioned above. But now they're just becoming a truism... and they are so boring. I tried it once, and I deleted it the next day. All you ever do is cut, chop, smash and heal. And it makes you feel like running up to a Jungle Troll and say "Hey brother!"
1. Slow to learn or understand.
2. Tending to make poor decisions or careless mistakes.
3. Marked by a lack of intelligence or care; foolish or careless.
Now when I said Warrior/Monks are stupid, I don't exactly mean any of the definations mentioned above. But now they're just becoming a truism... and they are so boring. I tried it once, and I deleted it the next day. All you ever do is cut, chop, smash and heal. And it makes you feel like running up to a Jungle Troll and say "Hey brother!"
Eagle923
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rothgar
*dances the hokey-pokey with Makkert*
|
the geckooo
Quote:
just wants to shake it all about!! |
Spyle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haung Yu
But now they're just becoming a truism... and they are so boring. I tried it once, and I deleted it the next day. All you ever do is cut, chop, smash and heal. And it makes you feel like running up to a Jungle Troll and say "Hey brother!"
|
Really it is hard though to do something like deep wound, weaken, cripple. Oh wait, that's pressing the keys 1, 2, and 3 in order shortly after you pressed spacebar to attack. Damn, wish I was quick enough to play a warrior.
Luggage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haung Yu
And it makes you feel like running up to a Jungle Troll and say "Hey brother!"
|
Next time I want some tanks for a group I'll ask:
"Group looking for Jungle Trolls!"
defstar
How can we single out "dumb warriors" without mentioning the arrogance of many monks?
Now, keep in mind that this is BY NO MEANS meant to apply to all monks- as I do appreciate what monks do for the team. But from my experience, when you finally can get a monk with a lfg request, once you get to the mission/quest, it is typically the monk's way or the highway. i.e. "you better stop now or else I wont heal/res you...etc...etc.."
Is this not a team oriented game? Remember, to succeed we are ALL needed! One is not better than the other!
*I am sure that this will bring many "tanks should wait more" comments, and I do agree, but I just wanted to bring a new facet of the equation to light.
Now, keep in mind that this is BY NO MEANS meant to apply to all monks- as I do appreciate what monks do for the team. But from my experience, when you finally can get a monk with a lfg request, once you get to the mission/quest, it is typically the monk's way or the highway. i.e. "you better stop now or else I wont heal/res you...etc...etc.."
Is this not a team oriented game? Remember, to succeed we are ALL needed! One is not better than the other!
*I am sure that this will bring many "tanks should wait more" comments, and I do agree, but I just wanted to bring a new facet of the equation to light.
MezMercenary
I think what people have to remember is that none of these classes are WINNERS all by themselves. Each class has it's Weakness & Strength... so if you send a ELE into battle with a sword, watch him die a horible death... but if the ele has a team of people to do the melee or heal for him/her while the cast those deadly spells it's a winning combo.
The talk of "this class is stupid" IS stupid.
You should be more upset with the person saying it than the class they're playing.
The talk of "this class is stupid" IS stupid.
You should be more upset with the person saying it than the class they're playing.
Tanik
I'd just like note, that i play warriors exclusively. I've played every other character and when it comes down to it... i can't sit outside of combat, i have to be in the thick of things. This game really needs another Melee class, the casters are cool and all... but ENOUGH already lol, 1 class for melee might be plenty to keep the balance.. but its not enough to have fun, although i am playing a R/W now and havin abit of fun with that
And a reply to the Warriors = Easy Mode, ever try a W/Me? End game, you're right they do kick alotta butt still, but early on.. you have no real way to heal yourself other than healing signet *shudder* and you become a dependant warrior..
And a reply to the Warriors = Easy Mode, ever try a W/Me? End game, you're right they do kick alotta butt still, but early on.. you have no real way to heal yourself other than healing signet *shudder* and you become a dependant warrior..
Aloren
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ollj
= Youre stupid because damage is by far not everything!
comon situation: Paladin: "Warriormonks are the best, because they deal the most damage" Me:"How come you always see Paladins that tell others that palladins do most damage and you NEVER see Elementarists that tell others that they can cast the most spells?" Palladin:"Nont know!" Me: "Because Elementarists are far more intelligent than Warriors!" BTW Warriors dont deal the most damage, Elementarists (splash damage), Mesmers (indirect damage), Necros (short time damage boost), Rangers (Damage buffing Satelites) and monks (Smithing adjanced) do! Did I miss a class? Just because you dont see numbers on the screen does not mean you dont do damage. You also in comparison NEVER EVER read: Mesmer: "I prevent the most Spells to be cast" Ranger: "I shoot the most arrors to interrupt others actions" Necro: "I can double our teams Power and ignore physical armor" Monk: "I can heal (and protect)" (okay, you can hear that quite a lot because Palladins never get tired to ask a monk if it can heal, how stupid is that?) in the end: Guild wars is NOT Diabolo2, this game is not just about dealing damage and Warriors are the stupid class |
I grow tired of your genralities. I'm sure, however, that a wall somewhere will listen to your pointless complaining.
Sure some warriors are idiots, but that can be said about any class. How about the elementalist that likes to tank?
Quit making generalities and just play the game.
Spyle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tanik
I'd just like note, that i play warriors exclusively. I've played every other character and when it comes down to it... i can't sit outside of combat, i have to be in the thick of things. This game really needs another Melee class, the casters are cool and all... but ENOUGH already lol, 1 class for melee might be plenty to keep the balance.. but its not enough to have fun, although i am playing a R/W now and havin abit of fun with that :P
|
C-Tzar
Inde
And locked.
Thank you for that profound statement.
Quote:
Warriors are the stupid class |