Quote:
Originally Posted by sama
isn't there a bit of a double standard here? i mean, would it be ok for people in top guilds to post here if they accomplished the same feat without voice comm, without a full team of eight, and held it for 5 matches? would people say, oh well you're from so and so guild so that doesn't count as a pug and if you did any less then you're not living up to expectations?
these aren't rhetorical questions, i'm really curious what ppl think.
|
Well, you have an interesting point there, but the ratio of my thread was just to show that PvP in GW is really balanced and non-elitist. I wouldn't bother to post if the party were composed by 2 Idiot Savants, 3 Negative Zero and 3 Treacherous Empire. That is still a PUG and not a guild, but actually it's more like a dream team than a party with different people.
Here's what I'm pretty convinced of: if you have a good group of friends who want to play seriously, you can test your party build, improve it match after match, and face some top guilds with a fair chance to win. No one here says that Uber rare items and superior runes are useless, they are of course an advantage, but when you're in the middle of the match your ability as a player AND the skills you chose count as 90% of the whole. Forgetting to body-block someone, rezzing your ally a second later or using a spell at the wrong time (which actually are common mistakes everyone could make) can get your group killed, eventually, and won't be compensated by any Uber equipment whatsoever.
A Guild is a Guild and has an advantage over PUGs from the start, but that doesn't mean you can't compete if you play cleverly, and, sometimes, win.