What would be more fun!?
Scizor
Which would be more fun to play? A warrior or a Ranger. I like the idea of chaming pets and dealing some nice damage with a bow. Yet I also like the idea of having a dazzling sword showing people whats for. I have pretty much giving up on my necromancer idea. Heh. However I have come at another crossroad.
Ren Falconhand
I have always favored the Bow. Even in my old D&D days way back in the day. 
But I could not make up my mind so I made two chars. some people see shooting somebody from a far as the cheap way but I see it as skill. 
Ren
But I could not make up my mind so I made two chars. some people see shooting somebody from a far as the cheap way but I see it as skill. Ren
Sin
Not to state the obvious to be mean or anything but you could try a warrior/ranger or ranger/warrior and get the best of both worlds? Just a thought man
Smodo
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scizor
Which would be more fun to play? A warrior or a Ranger. I like the idea of chaming pets and dealing some nice damage with a bow. Yet I also like the idea of having a dazzling sword showing people whats for. I have pretty much giving up on my necromancer idea. Heh. However I have come at another crossroad.
|
But you could always do R/W or W/R.
Scizor
Yeah see tI forgot to mention that Id do W/N or R/E so for warrir i could do that vampric touch and what not. And for ranger i could have some nifty spells for those just-in-case moments. 
Curlyfry
Hey, yes, preferably i would go warrior for fun. Swords look really threatening and cool, and it takes alot of skill to be good!!!
Dreamsmith
*psst* You can have up to four characters. Why not do both?
HotSnack
I prefer bows followed by... the axe and hammer.
Never could understand sword fans in GW, but hey experiment with both. Doesn't take long to bring a char to decent level afterall.
Never could understand sword fans in GW, but hey experiment with both. Doesn't take long to bring a char to decent level afterall.
Rushing Wind
Try them as primary/secondary (either way) or use one for two seperate characters. Lots of learning either way. IMO I love tanking and being the front line but I have a ranger character too and she's hella fun... probably cuz her secondary is a Mesmer and loves sucking the life outta the incompetents she comes across! Not that that has been too many since she's still in Pre-Seared Ascalon sitting at lvl 3 right now.
fawgre
If you really can't decide, ask your guildmates if there are any positions that need filling.
Weezer_Blue
Ranger is more fun.
RANGER > warrior
*is completely biased*
RANGER > warrior
*is completely biased*
Xellos
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Weezer_Blue
Ranger is more fun.
RANGER > warrior *is completely biased* |
Plus, which other character has trenchcoats?
fawgre
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Xellos
Plus, which other character has trenchcoats?
|
Also, male rangers are way more attractive than male warriors.
William of Orange
Rangers look more..."suave" than Warriors do in my opinion. But I'm partial to sniping people myself, so Ranger was just a natural choice.
At some point in time, I'll have run through every profession, so I'll get a feel for which one I like better according to how they actually play rather than how they look.
At some point in time, I'll have run through every profession, so I'll get a feel for which one I like better according to how they actually play rather than how they look.
Xellos
Hey, no matter what mask you take for ranger, it still looks decently cool. To be a power gamer, you have to look stupid. A porridge bowl for a helmet, some funky armour with stripes, and a whole bunch of other stuff. A ranger on the other hand, just needs druid set. Wow, decisions decisions.
Perishiko ReLLiK
This beta weekend is my ranger testing time!! cause they're the most fun!
pft... can we say... bird of death... exactly... case closed.
pft... can we say... bird of death... exactly... case closed.