Moe Syszlak: tv ugly and ugly ugly
DrSLUGFly
one thing that has always bothered me about fantasy is superheroes / save the world. Now I know that for an epic feel, save the world is pretty much necessary, but what about the heroes? I tried to make an ugly warrior, but all the faces available and body shapes available are too perfect. The closest I got was TV ugly, which is kind of... well... boring. I'd like to be able to truly uglify a character if I so choose. Why do warriors have to be buff? Why not a fat warrior, or a skinny warrior? Why do all mages have to be skinny? why not fat or buff? And why is every female character either cute or sexy accompanied by a stunning body? I want more variety, and I want options to be something other than a supermodel...
Jwh6913
i think the warrior isn't buff, it's more like fat/muscle making him look like a fat short tree... narrow the hips and, it'd look better :P
the women looks luscious though :P
the women looks luscious though :P
Shadowdaemon
warriors in platemail sure dont look buff, they just look fat.
dansamy
He looks fat in gladiator armor too, with his belly hanging out. It looks like he's been out drinking the ale with Stefan and Little Thom.
Ancalagon06
Being fat and being big aren't the same thing. The warriors run heavily towards big.
The monks are buff. Rangers look normal, while mesmers and eles look like stick-men to me.
And the females...well...what can I say? Only the female monk has boobs that are normal sized.
The monks are buff. Rangers look normal, while mesmers and eles look like stick-men to me.
And the females...well...what can I say? Only the female monk has boobs that are normal sized.
Eclair
Hey, in their world of magic, I'm sure they already used their arcane arts to do a body-makeover =P
DarrenJasper
Yes, we're super-buff and sexy but also unwaveringly celibate. Sorry.
Ancalagon06
I wonder just how far the tatoos go....
DrSLUGFly
my point being, I want a variety of body sizes. I have a monk, but what if I don't want him to look like the Governator? In my experience, both with fiction and in real life, monks and men of the cloth are very very seldom muscular... in fact, they are most often quite the opposite. Anybody remember Friar Tuck of Robin Hood fame? He was a tub! I want a fat monk! I want an ugly (like children screaming ugly) female warrior, I want an old, wizened elementalist... or a crone female monk...
spiritofcat
actually, you can have a wizened old looking elementalist, at least in the face...
DrSLUGFly
that's the one I chose... he doesn't look old and wizened... he looks... I don't know... battle worn maybe. He looks like a skinny warrior might. I took the oldest face I could find, which couldn't possibly be topping 40 if he were in real life. I want an elementalist to look like an alcoholic does at 60 or 70.
Ancalagon06
a 60 year old alcoholic? Dude, I'm all for realisim in life, but I don't want to have the urge to puke every time I see my character's face.
DrSLUGFly
nah, I'm just talking bedraggled, gray and wrinkly, stooped... this is what i think of when I think of an elementalist... what I have now is a stern looking, sparsely wrinkled, Russian gymnast.
Aaaaagh
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DrSLUGFly
one thing that has always bothered me about fantasy is superheroes / save the world. Now I know that for an epic feel, save the world is pretty much necessary, but what about the heroes? I tried to make an ugly warrior, but all the faces available and body shapes available are too perfect. The closest I got was TV ugly, which is kind of... well... boring. I'd like to be able to truly uglify a character if I so choose. Why do warriors have to be buff? Why not a fat warrior, or a skinny warrior? Why do all mages have to be skinny? why not fat or buff? And why is every female character either cute or sexy accompanied by a stunning body? I want more variety, and I want options to be something other than a supermodel...
|
spiritofcat
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DrSLUGFly
nah, I'm just talking bedraggled, gray and wrinkly, stooped... this is what i think of when I think of an elementalist... what I have now is a stern looking, sparsely wrinkled, Russian gymnast.
|
RTSFirebat
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aaaaagh
Welcome to America.
|
Epinephrine
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ancalagon06
And the females...well...what can I say? Only the female monk has boobs that are normal sized.
|
There is no "normal".
Besides, the female ranger is quite slim and has very typical, umm...., attributes for a slim build.
I too wouldn't mind a veriety of choices. One of my favorite role-playing characters ever was Donwulf the pubmaster, a character I made who was a retired mercenary who -gasp- ran a pub. 46 yrs old, balding, a little overweight - the retired football player build. Why not have the option - real people can be heroes too. When Ascalon is invaded, guys like Donwulf dig their old armour out of the closet, sharpen their swords and march out there - but the only ones we meet are Stefan and Thom
dansamy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DrSLUGFly
nah, I'm just talking bedraggled, gray and wrinkly, stooped... this is what i think of when I think of an elementalist... what I have now is a stern looking, sparsely wrinkled, Russian gymnast.
|
johnnylange
So does that mean you wouldn't having Martha Stewart weld a electric mixer and some outdoor furniture from Kmart? 
dansamy
Little Thom definitely aint "little", is he?
dansamy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by johnnylange
So does that mean you wouldn't having Martha Stewart weld a electric mixer and some outdoor furniture from Kmart?
|
DrSLUGFly
guild mate of mine thinks that Little Thom is actually Ron Jeremy in disguise . I have my suspicions too. To Dansamy, I agree. Men typically are power lustful and so lean towards the darker side, not just the dark arts since all arts embody a good and an evil. Perhaps as a good elementalist (particularly earth and water) I can easily imagine a druidic woman. But as an evil elementalist I envision somebody who has been alive far too long (likely man), whose body has been tortured and twisted by the magic they've weilded and the arts they've studied...
. I have my suspicions too. To Dansamy, I agree. Men typically are power lustful and so lean towards the darker side, not just the dark arts since all arts embody a good and an evil. Perhaps as a good elementalist (particularly earth and water) I can easily imagine a druidic woman. But as an evil elementalist I envision somebody who has been alive far too long (likely man), whose body has been tortured and twisted by the magic they've weilded and the arts they've studied...
Dan Mega
Each character will have a body type that fits what they need to do. Warriors have heavy armor and heavy weapons...thus they are going to be big. Big doesn't mean buff though. Some of the warrior and guards don't look buff but they sure do look strong.
As for the women aspect of it, I do have to agree. I understand this is a "fantasy" game, but hell I wouldn't mind seeing a warrior woman that resembles the ball of dough known as Star Jones once in a while (did I just type that?).
As for the women aspect of it, I do have to agree. I understand this is a "fantasy" game, but hell I wouldn't mind seeing a warrior woman that resembles the ball of dough known as Star Jones once in a while (did I just type that?).
DarrenJasper
The fact is, if they implemented ugly character models, you and a handful of others would be the only ones who'd pick them. Everyone else would opt for flawless, stunning beauty, for the same reason that every girl you talk to in an AOL chatroom looks "like Britney Spears".
There ya go.
Male monks do get a Chow Yun-Fat face, though. I almost picked it.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Aaaaagh
Welcome to America.
|
Male monks do get a Chow Yun-Fat face, though. I almost picked it.
Luna Thirteen
Hey...I see lots of ugly characters...I mean not as ugly as some real life people, but still ugly enough to make me not want to look at them.
Sovetskeey
My Elementalist looked like Mel Gibson :-/
DrSLUGFly
the problem is, TV ugly is still attractive but in a very borin way. If I could have a woman character who looked like the Bandit Bloodsworns in pre-searing, at least it would be more interesting...
Epinephrine
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DrSLUGFly
guild mate of mine thinks that Little Thom is actually Ron Jeremy in disguise
. I have my suspicions too. To Dansamy, I agree. Men typically are power lustful and so lean towards the darker side, not just the dark arts since all arts embody a good and an evil. Perhaps as a good elementalist (particularly earth and water) I can easily imagine a druidic woman. But as an evil elementalist I envision somebody who has been alive far too long (likely man), whose body has been tortured and twisted by the magic they've weilded and the arts they've studied... |
I'll say this - your sexism may be acceptable to the community, but not to me. I'm a man and in touch with nature - I can tell you why you can use a bit of wood sorrel in a salad and why you shouldn't eat too much of it, what the various ground cover herbs are and what their uses are or identify wood by its grain. I know why ironwood is hard to cut, what parts of a cattail can be eaten and what plants are toxic, even in your garden. Lean toward the darker side my ass - can't wait till people take sexism in this direction seriously.
Talesin Darkbriar
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DrSLUGFly
one thing that has always bothered me about fantasy is superheroes / save the world. Now I know that for an epic feel, save the world is pretty much necessary, but what about the heroes? I tried to make an ugly warrior, but all the faces available and body shapes available are too perfect. The closest I got was TV ugly, which is kind of... well... boring. I'd like to be able to truly uglify a character if I so choose. Why do warriors have to be buff? Why not a fat warrior, or a skinny warrior? Why do all mages have to be skinny? why not fat or buff? And why is every female character either cute or sexy accompanied by a stunning body? I want more variety, and I want options to be something other than a supermodel...
|
Get thee to EQ2 where EVERY character option is a choice between "Hideous" and "wretchedly ugly" (With possible exceptions for the dark & wood elves)
Believe me, better a world of supermodels than one of mongoloidism.
Otherwise, I like your suggestion of body structure types - give us a slider to go from emaciated to obese!
Talesin
ManadartheHealer
I would like different, even "ugly" body types.
For my ranger, I wanted the face of a hardened old huntsman with a nice scar going across his face, and a looming, stout body that would put him at like 7 feet tall...I wanted eyes that would seem to pierce right through you. In general, I would have liked a character that scared the shit out of anyone who saw him.
Instead, I got some random grey-haired guy with a headband and gentle eyes. Not very tall, but skinny and feminine features.
Now when wandering through the Maguuma, the trolls and spiders laugh rather than cringe in fear 
For my ranger, I wanted the face of a hardened old huntsman with a nice scar going across his face, and a looming, stout body that would put him at like 7 feet tall...I wanted eyes that would seem to pierce right through you. In general, I would have liked a character that scared the shit out of anyone who saw him.
Instead, I got some random grey-haired guy with a headband and gentle eyes. Not very tall, but skinny and feminine features.
Now when wandering through the Maguuma, the trolls and spiders laugh rather than cringe in fear
DrSLUGFly
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Epinephrine
Yeah, way to be sexist. Amazing how it's ok to be sexist as long as you are bashing men.
I'll say this - your sexism may be acceptable to the community, but not to me. I'm a man and in touch with nature - I can tell you why you can use a bit of wood sorrel in a salad and why you shouldn't eat too much of it, what the various ground cover herbs are and what their uses are or identify wood by its grain. I know why ironwood is hard to cut, what parts of a cattail can be eaten and what plants are toxic, even in your garden. Lean toward the darker side my ass - can't wait till people take sexism in this direction seriously. |
getting back to the point... I don't want Brad Pitt or the Governator forced upon my charactrs face... perhaps I'd also like Dustin Hoffman (not to say that he's ugly, but he's got a beautiful honker) or just some sort of variation on the all-too-common need to be better than we are.
ManadartheHealer
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DrSLUGFly
I'm also very in touch with my feminine side, as an artist and a writer. .
|
Just curious, but what kind of art and writing activites do you engage in? [/offtopic]
DrSLUGFly
I used to paint, expression and surreal, portraits and sometimes (though not so often, still lifes and landscapes. But I found painting took up too much time so I've put aside the brushes and just sketch now, leaving me more time for writing. If you like you can check out some of my stuff here. As for writing, I used to write a lot of poetry, now I focus mostly on short essays and a novel with the occasional excursions into poetry.
dansamy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Epinephrine
Yeah, way to be sexist. Amazing how it's ok to be sexist as long as you are bashing men.
I'll say this - your sexism may be acceptable to the community, but not to me. I'm a man and in touch with nature - I can tell you why you can use a bit of wood sorrel in a salad and why you shouldn't eat too much of it, what the various ground cover herbs are and what their uses are or identify wood by its grain. I know why ironwood is hard to cut, what parts of a cattail can be eaten and what plants are toxic, even in your garden. Lean toward the darker side my ass - can't wait till people take sexism in this direction seriously. |
DrSLUGFly
The gender role lines can not be erased. You're not just talking about culture here, you're talking about instinct. The strongest animals always lead the pack. With elephants it's age but this one and possibly a few other rare exceptions aside, the hierarchy is based on power. Even with monogamous wolves, after the alphas have eaten it's the strongest or the most intimidating who eats next. You know why the males of most birds and many other animals are so brightly colored? It's because they stand out to predators and therefor show strength... power... there's no way we could know for sure what the real "gender-roles" are with humans since that would involve an experiment which no person in their right mind would condone, but we can look at animals that are similar to us and in almost all of them (I only say almost because always is a bad word ) the hierarchy is based on power and a male sits at the top. By belittling and condemning traditional gender roles, we've solved problems of abuse and oppression but we've also caused problems with confusion and uncertainty. We don't need to erase the gender lines, we need to define them in a way that people will understand and most importantly in such a way that neither side will look down on or think less of the other. Male and female are important, male and female are valuable and needed... but they are not the same, they could never be the same.
) the hierarchy is based on power and a male sits at the top. By belittling and condemning traditional gender roles, we've solved problems of abuse and oppression but we've also caused problems with confusion and uncertainty. We don't need to erase the gender lines, we need to define them in a way that people will understand and most importantly in such a way that neither side will look down on or think less of the other. Male and female are important, male and female are valuable and needed... but they are not the same, they could never be the same.
dansamy
I, for one, don't actually want an erasure of gender-role lines. Quite frankly, I like being female and you couldn't pay me enough to be male. But, there are a good number of people who are insistently marching ahead with their theme of gender equality.
Epinephrine
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dansamy
It has been ingrained from the earliest versions of fairy tales read to me that men are power-hungry and tend to practice dark arts while women usually are more wholly attuned to Gaea. Whether or not its sexist, it's what we read to our little girls as bedtime stories every night. We teach our children this sexism every time we give a little girl a babydoll and a little boy a toy sword or gun. Ever wonder why Mother Earth and Aphrodite and Ceres are feminine...or why Hades and Zeus and Thor and Mars (he's a good example - god of war is masculine) are masculine? These images have been deeply ingrained in us. They're not going to disappear simply because you don't like them. It will take years, and considering the progress we've made with racism, maybe sometime a couple hundred years from now there will be equality between the sexes and the gender-role lines will truly have been erased.
|
Males can also be the ones who are "good" and in touch with nature - in the norse myths the male gods are very much those in touch with the land, in babylonian legend the land is nourished and brought to life by the semen of Enki; so men are even portrayed as the givers of life.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dr. Slugfly
You know why the males of most birds and many other animals are so brightly colored? It's because they stand out to predators and therefor show strength... power... there's no way we could know for sure what the real "gender-roles" are with humans since that would involve an experiment which no person in their right mind would condone, but we can look at animals that are similar to us and in almost all of them (I only say almost because always is a bad word ) the hierarchy is based on power and a male sits at the top. By belittling and condemning traditional gender roles, we've solved problems of abuse and oppression but we've also caused problems with confusion and uncertainty. We don't need to erase the gender lines, we need to define them in a way that people will understand and most importantly in such a way that neither side will look down on or think less of the other. Male and female are important, male and female are valuable and needed... but they are not the same, they could never be the same.
|
Yes, men and women are different. We have different motivations and differ psychologically and physically. I won't be labelled as evil however, and propagating sexist stereotypes doesn't help anyone. I could just as easily claim that women are power-hungry and calculating, and manipulative. They choose their mates based on power and influence, and men choose more based on looks, which is a sign of both genetic health as well as physical health. In that way, men are motivated by something very natural, while women seek advantage. Either way, ascribing "evil" to a sex and then generalising it is sexism,and it isn't acceptable.
Sorry to drag the conversation to seriousness - I am all for a variety of body types and faces in GW.
Big Fat Duck
why do female elementalists have really really long necks.. especially the taller ones
ranger and mesmer are the only classes with normal looking people
ranger and mesmer are the only classes with normal looking people
dansamy
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Epinephrine
There are as many cases of women being evil in mythology as there are of men, and while Gaea is female in some mythologies those in touch with the land are often the men. Think of the Furies, Pandora, Hecate, Hel, Kali, Nephthys, Tiamat etc... Oh, and way to use Ares and conveiniently omit Athena - the two were gods of war, and fought each other.
Males can also be the ones who are "good" and in touch with nature - in the norse myths the male gods are very much those in touch with the land, in babylonian legend the land is nourished and brought to life by the semen of Enki; so men are even portrayed as the givers of life. Oh, I studied evolutionary psychology and biology in university - I know all about that stuff. I know about the correlation between monogamous-polygynous behaviour in primates to sexual dimorphism in species, I know about the game theoretic analyses of animal behavious, from sexual signalling, bluffing and combat and the investment of energy in acts like "stotting", in which the animal demonstrates it's fitness to a predator. Yes, men and women are different. We have different motivations and differ psychologically and physically. I won't be labelled as evil however, and propagating sexist stereotypes doesn't help anyone. I could just as easily claim that women are power-hungry and calculating, and manipulative. They choose their mates based on power and influence, and men choose more based on looks, which is a sign of both genetic health as well as physical health. In that way, men are motivated by something very natural, while women seek advantage. Either way, ascribing "evil" to a sex and then generalising it is sexism,and it isn't acceptable. Sorry to drag the conversation to seriousness - I am all for a variety of body types and faces in GW. |
You were the one who generalized our views as sexism. None of us brought up that terminology until you did.
Advocate Of Hell
This game, to me revolves arround beauty, keep the charicters beautiful.