Armor and elemental damage

Laizness

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Jun 2005

Me/N

If all spells defaulty target body, whats the point of lets say a monk having elemental resist armor on anywhere besides the body?

Aaaaagh

Aaaaagh

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: May 2005

For one, because not all weapond default to target body.

Laizness

Ascalonian Squire

Join Date: Jun 2005

Me/N

So if theres no ranger and no warrior, then elemental defense in anywhere but the body is completely useless?

Myodato

Myodato

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: May 2005

WOR

Mo/

Not all spells default to chest, Magic missiles such as flare act similarly to arrows. Staves and wands also do of course, which can do significant damage with the aid of Conjure X. I remember a thread here recently where somebody was getting hit for huge damage by stoning, then realised it was because they weren't wearing a helmet.

Of course, elemental is still more useful on the chest than anywhere else. As a primary monk, I use +ele armour on the chest, and tatoos for extra energy everywhere else.