Shouldn't it be -25 health for major runes rather than -50?
Minor has +1 attribute and no health decrease
Major currently has +2 attribute and -50 health decrease
Superior has +4 attribute and -75 health decrease
If there was a +3 attribute, then that would be -50 health.
Major Runes the worst
MaglorD
arnansnow
Superior is +3 not 4. Although major runes are still the worst.
Stev0
Runes should'nt give that much of a boost without a penalty.
MaglorD
oic...now you know I've never used a superior.
ok if superior is only +3 then major isn't so bad I guess.
ok if superior is only +3 then major isn't so bad I guess.
Magus
Minors are good because they give you an attribute bonus with no penalty. Superiors are good because they give you much more specialization. Major is just the worst because they provide neither. 
Gs-Cyan Bloodbane
major is only good until you can get your hands on the superior
Jwh6913
I'd like to have majors be - 25, and sup be - 50
i think it's a lil more fair and brings back the majors into play
i think it's a lil more fair and brings back the majors into play
Tuna
True, there are few situations where you would use a major if you had a suprerior. However, until you get that superior the major is great.
Jade
I dunno, I'd rather take a -150 health decrease for a +2 on 3 attributes than the same decrease in health for a +3 on 2 attributes.
Arctic Strike
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jwh6913
I'd like to have majors be - 25, and sup be - 50
i think it's a lil more fair and brings back the majors into play |