totally /signed
second in command/ co leader as alot of benifits as many people really hate absent leaders
Guild Co-Leaders
Stoneys Rock
.Inspire
/signed
maybe if you could make your own ranks like
Recruit
Soldier
Elite Soldier
Sergeant
Lieutenant
Commander
Co-leader
Leader etc.
but co-leader is fine for me
maybe if you could make your own ranks like
Recruit
Soldier
Elite Soldier
Sergeant
Lieutenant
Commander
Co-leader
Leader etc.
but co-leader is fine for me
Tact
/signed
Would be a nice benefit for the larger guilds, which generally have a high number of officers.
Would be a nice benefit for the larger guilds, which generally have a high number of officers.
Opeth
/whatever
Dean Harper
/signed
Zui
/why not
the entire guild system could be improved..
the entire guild system could be improved..
Ebony Shadowheart
/signed!
This would make things so much easier for ppl that start a guild together. My fiance and I share the role as 'guild leader' but its just a pain to switch back and forth as leader all the darn time.
This would make things so much easier for ppl that start a guild together. My fiance and I share the role as 'guild leader' but its just a pain to switch back and forth as leader all the darn time.
funnyman100
me and my friend both made our guild and the cape and chose the hall and he said there should be co-leaders i was gonna make a thread but i saw this one. So...
/SIGNED!!!
/SIGNED!!!
Perkunas
Co-Leader, good idea.
spawn of the light
/signed love the idea
Ismoke
SIGNED! ! z1
agk512
/signed
amazing idea. in my opinon the whole guild system is not enough. i dont like how you only have officers leader and members. i hate being a member and treated the same as someone who hasent been on for 2 or 3 weeks. there should be like 10 different ranks for the guild and you would have to work your way up the ranks to have power in the guild. i dont get a big kick out of being in a guild right now. i do become an officer a lot because i get the leader to like me, but there has been so many times i have quit a guild because i just didnt care about it. the council of leaders for the aliance is an amazing idea too. aliances just dont have enough to keep them together.
of course, if you dont want to have the new type of guild layout, you can just choose to go the traditional way. so in the end this would satisfy everybody
amazing idea. in my opinon the whole guild system is not enough. i dont like how you only have officers leader and members. i hate being a member and treated the same as someone who hasent been on for 2 or 3 weeks. there should be like 10 different ranks for the guild and you would have to work your way up the ranks to have power in the guild. i dont get a big kick out of being in a guild right now. i do become an officer a lot because i get the leader to like me, but there has been so many times i have quit a guild because i just didnt care about it. the council of leaders for the aliance is an amazing idea too. aliances just dont have enough to keep them together.
of course, if you dont want to have the new type of guild layout, you can just choose to go the traditional way. so in the end this would satisfy everybody
Bane of Worlds
/signed
there are a number of benefits so
there are a number of benefits so
Azekiael
/signed
Also what about allowing members to scrimage without an officer present...
Also what about allowing members to scrimage without an officer present...
darktemplar32489
/signed
Scroz
/signed
Bigger guilds definitely need more tiers in the guild roster
Bigger guilds definitely need more tiers in the guild roster
Mr Toraan
/signed
Carth`
/signed
legion_rat
/signed
~the rat officer~
~the rat officer~
countesscorpula
not to beat a dead horse or anything but...
/signed
/signed
Emik
Don't see any problem having this 'option' available.
As stated before me, you don't HAVE to use this if you don't want to
/signed
As stated before me, you don't HAVE to use this if you don't want to
/signed
Altair
/signed
King_of_Eles
/signed
Belleal
I agree with this. A very nice option to have available.
/signed
/signed
Aegeroth
/signed
this would relieve so many people.
this would relieve so many people.
Janonymous
/signed
I once created a guild with a friend but I haven't tried to make it big yet. He wants to, so I assigned him as Guild Leader, while we actually both should be leader.
I once created a guild with a friend but I haven't tried to make it big yet. He wants to, so I assigned him as Guild Leader, while we actually both should be leader.
duncan99
very nice, i made a guild with 2 friends of mine but im the leader while they deserve that spot too.
/signed
/signed
Ilithis Mithilander
/signed
I co-leader my guild with my girlfriend. Unfortunatly I got the short end of the stick as the officer...this would make things so much better.
I co-leader my guild with my girlfriend. Unfortunatly I got the short end of the stick as the officer...this would make things so much better.
Alex Morningstar
Our current setup is 3 co-leaders as officers and a mule account the 3 of us can access in the leader spot. Though it is great fun to play "guess which asshat is on the mule account" from time to time.
Rurik Jangeer
/signed
Alliance Roster too pl0x!
The ranked guilds in alliance idea earlier mentioned would also be a great improvement.
Customizeable ranks with customizeable powers pl0x pl0x.
So signed
Alliance Roster too pl0x!
The ranked guilds in alliance idea earlier mentioned would also be a great improvement.
Customizeable ranks with customizeable powers pl0x pl0x.
So signed
Drelias Melaku
/signed
My boyfriend and I are co-leaders, but I am merely seen as an "officer." It would be convenient if I didn't have to log into his account to change the cape when it's my turn.
My boyfriend and I are co-leaders, but I am merely seen as an "officer." It would be convenient if I didn't have to log into his account to change the cape when it's my turn.
Ama Seraphim
/signed
would love to see NEW ranks for members.. Some are great for officers, others like being members, but some have alot of knowledge and would be great to give a better RANK system for those types of players!! So..
/signed
/signed
and /signed
would love to see NEW ranks for members.. Some are great for officers, others like being members, but some have alot of knowledge and would be great to give a better RANK system for those types of players!! So..
/signed
/signed
and /signed
mikeejimbo
/signed
I think anything that would improve our options in guilds would be good, especially if your titles could reflect your organization. Our guild is extremely Lax, for example... it's not that everyone is in charge so much as no one is.
I think anything that would improve our options in guilds would be good, especially if your titles could reflect your organization. Our guild is extremely Lax, for example... it's not that everyone is in charge so much as no one is.
tyche7
/signed
very good idea. My guild is basically two people but both of us are pretty much leaders. (-:
very good idea. My guild is basically two people but both of us are pretty much leaders. (-:
evil joo
/signed ftw
Exterminate all
/Signed
Great idea, i would love this.
Great idea, i would love this.
Link Kokori
/signed
my best friend and i started the guild and i think he should share leadership with me
my best friend and i started the guild and i think he should share leadership with me
Throm
/signed ranks would be good
Darkpower Alchemist
The thought of co leaders, though admirable, is not logical. As leader of my guild, I realized that it's not always best to have multiple leaders due to the confusion that it can create.
I had some computer issues a few months back and had to make one of my officers to be the leader. While I was offline most of the time, the guild and alliance grew rather large under her watchful eyes. However, when I regained control, the alliance seemed abit unnerved by the change in leadership and the guild seemed more inclined to respond to her than I, who was the leader.
It caused abit of confusion for some time, but eventually sorted itself out. My point is that people generally rather have 1 leader and a cabinet of high level officers than have the confusion of co leaders. Having multiple leaders doesn't show the stability that a group needs from its core membership. If a leader needs to step down for some reason, the option of having co leaders would be helpful to retain his/her position, but isn't best for the overall guild populace.
In any and every governing body, 1 primary leader holds the position of leadership, even if their are governing bodies that offer checks and balances to that leadership. To make multiple leaders will only cause confusion and weaken the position.
I have seen guilds that rotate leadership duties between specific officers, and for some that works, but usually their guild is small and has a high turnover rate with recruits or their leaders have their own agendas to accomplish and have conflicts within. So, I feel that 1 leader is enough, but officers should always voice their opinions.
Also, in the case of alliance leadership, the thought of alliance co leaders is similar to guild co leaders. Leadership is not to be held by more than 1 person, yet a ruling council is a good idea due to each guild's needs and desires. Leaders should always communicate amongst one another, and regular meetings among leaders would be a good thing for discussing the status and growth or lack there of, that each leader is looking for from their guild and/or alliance. Rank differences may be interesting, but how would that work? Elder members over new members? More experienced over less experience? The word "member" keeps all who are not core members on an even level, and thus keeping down the thoughts of elitism within the structure.
However, that's just my opinion. We can't all be chiefs, because their has to be indians in order for a chief to exist.
I had some computer issues a few months back and had to make one of my officers to be the leader. While I was offline most of the time, the guild and alliance grew rather large under her watchful eyes. However, when I regained control, the alliance seemed abit unnerved by the change in leadership and the guild seemed more inclined to respond to her than I, who was the leader.
It caused abit of confusion for some time, but eventually sorted itself out. My point is that people generally rather have 1 leader and a cabinet of high level officers than have the confusion of co leaders. Having multiple leaders doesn't show the stability that a group needs from its core membership. If a leader needs to step down for some reason, the option of having co leaders would be helpful to retain his/her position, but isn't best for the overall guild populace.
In any and every governing body, 1 primary leader holds the position of leadership, even if their are governing bodies that offer checks and balances to that leadership. To make multiple leaders will only cause confusion and weaken the position.
I have seen guilds that rotate leadership duties between specific officers, and for some that works, but usually their guild is small and has a high turnover rate with recruits or their leaders have their own agendas to accomplish and have conflicts within. So, I feel that 1 leader is enough, but officers should always voice their opinions.
Also, in the case of alliance leadership, the thought of alliance co leaders is similar to guild co leaders. Leadership is not to be held by more than 1 person, yet a ruling council is a good idea due to each guild's needs and desires. Leaders should always communicate amongst one another, and regular meetings among leaders would be a good thing for discussing the status and growth or lack there of, that each leader is looking for from their guild and/or alliance. Rank differences may be interesting, but how would that work? Elder members over new members? More experienced over less experience? The word "member" keeps all who are not core members on an even level, and thus keeping down the thoughts of elitism within the structure.
However, that's just my opinion. We can't all be chiefs, because their has to be indians in order for a chief to exist.
Feldar
/signed
Same thing in my guild. This would be good.
Same thing in my guild. This would be good.