Maybe u could personalize a shield to get +4 al bonus to it (20 is a prettier number) - would basicaly work the same as customization, only u can wield. i mean, i use a shield i know i'll never sell or trade cos its just what i have been looking for since i started GW back in may 05.
So why not? +4 al to customize shield?
Shield Customization. 16 is a funny number.
2 pages • Page 1
As if hammers weren't unpopular enough already! Buffing shields is just going to make them even less desirable!
If you buffed shields, then you'd have to go buff all the other off-hand items. And then you have to buff two-handed weapons to make up for the fact that they can't be used with off-hand items.
Plus you've got the fact that only warriors can use shields effectively, and don't they have enough armor already? <.<
If you buffed shields, then you'd have to go buff all the other off-hand items. And then you have to buff two-handed weapons to make up for the fact that they can't be used with off-hand items.
Plus you've got the fact that only warriors can use shields effectively, and don't they have enough armor already? <.<
There's no harm in +5 energy to customized off hands at all, same as all customizations. usefull-ness should be given if u are willing to negate all value, ie: customizing a req.9 fellblace 15^50 thatu know u will never trade..u will use it forever so it should be that same for other items..there will be no balance issues.
/signed for off hands aswell ^^
/signed for off hands aswell ^^
B
16 is a great number! It's 2^4, or 4^2, or (2^2)^2. Think base 2 and it looks great;
1000 for 16 instead of 1010 for 20
/notsigned
It being a non base 10 number makes no difference. The shield provides 16AL, which is 1-(2^-16/40), or a 24.1% damage reduction - it would be a 29.3% reduction with 20 AL, and that's a significant change.
1000 for 16 instead of 1010 for 20
/notsigned
It being a non base 10 number makes no difference. The shield provides 16AL, which is 1-(2^-16/40), or a 24.1% damage reduction - it would be a 29.3% reduction with 20 AL, and that's a significant change.
Tarun
Technician's Corner Moderator
http://www.lunarsoft.net/ http://forums.lunarsoft.net/
Joined Jan 2006
/not signed
Yeah, chain lighnening does 85 damage. That isn't a very "nice" number so lets make it do 90 or 100 damage. It's a "nice" number. As a college math major talking here, I find your entire arguement ridiculous. There is no logic to it. Pi isn't exactly a nice number, but it is useful as heck.
In fact, I think 16 is a nice number. It's a perfect square. It is also the first integer (besides 1) that can get an integer after taking the 4th root of it. 2^4=16
A.net didn't pull 16 as the max armor for a shield out of a hat. It was done with careful intent in order to balance the game.
Yeah, chain lighnening does 85 damage. That isn't a very "nice" number so lets make it do 90 or 100 damage. It's a "nice" number. As a college math major talking here, I find your entire arguement ridiculous. There is no logic to it. Pi isn't exactly a nice number, but it is useful as heck.
In fact, I think 16 is a nice number. It's a perfect square. It is also the first integer (besides 1) that can get an integer after taking the 4th root of it. 2^4=16
A.net didn't pull 16 as the max armor for a shield out of a hat. It was done with careful intent in order to balance the game.
some very good arguments have been presented..some sound a little "Flamey" so i suggest those guys go and have a nice warm bottle and a nap. For the others who offered Real opinions how about if the +4 al was conditional to your style of gamplay ie;
Magmas Shield 16al (requires 8 str)
+29hp
-2 dmg (while in stance)
Customized +4 al (vs slashing dmg)
or vs fire, ice,lightning,blunt,peircing?? how about that? would that help the balance issue in questions.?
just a thought
Magmas Shield 16al (requires 8 str)
+29hp
-2 dmg (while in stance)
Customized +4 al (vs slashing dmg)
or vs fire, ice,lightning,blunt,peircing?? how about that? would that help the balance issue in questions.?
just a thought
p
Z
Tarun
Technician's Corner Moderator
http://www.lunarsoft.net/ http://forums.lunarsoft.net/
Joined Jan 2006
Rather amusing to look back and see all those not signing don't have warriors listed in their character lists.
Still seems like a nice idea, since pretty much everything else can be customized in the game.
Look at a lot of movies, you see warriors with their own shields. Look at Dragonheart, he customized his shield with a tooth of each dragon he had killed.
Still seems like a nice idea, since pretty much everything else can be customized in the game.
Look at a lot of movies, you see warriors with their own shields. Look at Dragonheart, he customized his shield with a tooth of each dragon he had killed.
/signed. Revive thread too. It makes sense. Only shields should be allowed to be customizable to provide a small armor bonus. You can't customize foci to provide more energy, unless somehow you can imbue them with a monster essence much like the mursaat infusions. But shield customization just makes perfect sense, and no amount of 'what about other stuff' justifications can not make it perfectly sensible.


