We, the undersigned, would like to get Alliance battles to how Redly suggests further on down the page. I will be updating the list regularly.
Signed.
Tongloid Tarthwood
Mando
Thadeus Tael (in game)
Redly
Kerrick1
Broodijzer
Terra Xin
Tuoba Hturht Eht
Jummeth
Alliance Battles Petition
Tongloid Tarthwood
Kakumei
So am I honestly the only person who prefers them this way?
Mando
i hate having to wait in towns to get a party, i liked it when u could just log on and go str8 into a battle like pve....
/Signed
/Signed
Theus
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kakumei
So am I honestly the only person who prefers them this way?
|
Since then it would be the team that had a pair of Healparty/Order of Pain/Etc spammers that would win.
I think all partys should be linked in team chat though.
Red
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Theus
nope..I like it this way was well.
Since then it would be the team that had a pair of Healparty/Order of Pain/Etc spammers that would win. I think all partys should be linked in team chat though. |
I believe that the suggestion has been made (in the 29,384,029,384,209 threads in the Sanitarium and the PvP-Alliance forums) that all 12 should appear in the party list, BUT the other 8 players should appear as allies, just like pets and NPCs. That way, though Heal Party, Aegis, and other All-Spells would still only affect your party of 4, you could still coordinate and Monklove on your entire team of 12. ^^
Kerrick??
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Redly
...all 12 should appear in the party list, BUT the other 8 players should appear as allies, just like pets and NPCs. That way, though Heal Party, Aegis, and other All-Spells would still only affect your party of 4, you could still coordinate and Monklove on your entire team of 12.
|
broodijzer
What Redly said would be perfect.. PLEASE.. now it's a pain for monks, because your 4 man party shatters out anyway, and it's a pain trying to click on a running character between a few dozen minions/other players.
Terra Xin
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Redly
Such brave people, to admit the new system.
I believe that the suggestion has been made (in the 29,384,029,384,209 threads in the Sanitarium and the PvP-Alliance forums) that all 12 should appear in the party list, BUT the other 8 players should appear as allies, just like pets and NPCs. That way, though Heal Party, Aegis, and other All-Spells would still only affect your party of 4, you could still coordinate and Monklove on your entire team of 12. ^^ |
Too bad your font is crappy, had to change it, lol j/k (about the crappy font... I still changed it^^!)
/signed
(psst, you forgot the additional rants in riverside inn)
Tuoba Hturt Eht
/signed for the other 8 team mates listed as allies
/signed for team chat for all 12 team mates
/signed for team chat for all 12 team mates
jummeth
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Redly
Such brave people, to admit the new system.
I believe that the suggestion has been made (in the 29,384,029,384,209 threads in the Sanitarium and the PvP-Alliance forums) that all 12 should appear in the party list, BUT the other 8 players should appear as allies, just like pets and NPCs. That way, though Heal Party, Aegis, and other All-Spells would still only affect your party of 4, you could still coordinate and Monklove on your entire team of 12. ^^ |
also team chat should be to your whole team, not just your party. Since anything in Local chat is... un-secure =P
Tongloid Tarthwood
Ok, I edited the list a bit, as I agree with Redly more than what I suggested at first. I also put the names on, but I don't want to stop there. When we get 100 names we're sending this list to arenanet. Power to the people! Viva la revoloution!
Katari
I understand why people aren't in the same party. Heal party and other similar spells would be grossly overpowererd otherwise.
However, being unable to see your allies health bars, and being unable to comunicate with them outside of whispers and local chat is very bad system.
The old system is ripe for abuse of party-wide skills, but the ability to communicate made it more fun. If the other teams appeared under 'allies' in the party window, and were still able to use team chat, that would be just fine.
However, being unable to see your allies health bars, and being unable to comunicate with them outside of whispers and local chat is very bad system.
The old system is ripe for abuse of party-wide skills, but the ability to communicate made it more fun. If the other teams appeared under 'allies' in the party window, and were still able to use team chat, that would be just fine.
Kool Pajamas
/signed all the way!
Great idea. I dont really mind getting four people together but I really want to be able to communicate to the other 8 people.
Great idea. I dont really mind getting four people together but I really want to be able to communicate to the other 8 people.
Spazztic2003
/signed
Alliance Battles suck now because of the reduction in communication.
Alliance Battles suck now because of the reduction in communication.
Sientir
/signed
I have found that it isn't too hard to get groups of 4 together, however, the inability to communcate or see the health bars of the others makes any sort of team-wide tactical communcation impossible. Additionally, it would be nice if people could form parties of their own size (they would be seperated from party-wise spells perhaps), but I don't know if such would be popular. Either way, a very large strategical element is lost in the lack of information in the form of team-wide communcations and health bar/selection ability.
I have found that it isn't too hard to get groups of 4 together, however, the inability to communcate or see the health bars of the others makes any sort of team-wide tactical communcation impossible. Additionally, it would be nice if people could form parties of their own size (they would be seperated from party-wise spells perhaps), but I don't know if such would be popular. Either way, a very large strategical element is lost in the lack of information in the form of team-wide communcations and health bar/selection ability.
Rayne Nightfyre
It's an annoyance the way it is now.
/Signed.
/Signed.
Malice Black
they wont change it..but i guess its worth a shot
/signed
/signed
TheLordOfBlah
/signed
pappayaponta
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Redly
Such brave people, to admit the new system.
I believe that the suggestion has been made (in the 29,384,029,384,209 threads in the Sanitarium and the PvP-Alliance forums) that all 12 should appear in the party list, BUT the other 8 players should appear as allies, just like pets and NPCs. That way, though Heal Party, Aegis, and other All-Spells would still only affect your party of 4, you could still coordinate and Monklove on your entire team of 12. ^^ |
/signed
R A C
/signed
Sax Dakota
/signed
Should be much more like the alliance battle of old. If you are worried about the heal party spam, have the other 8 members appear as allies. Also, we should have the option to enter alone, as in the old alliance battles in the preview event. Its becoming a little more "leet" now, than just having fun anymore.
Should be much more like the alliance battle of old. If you are worried about the heal party spam, have the other 8 members appear as allies. Also, we should have the option to enter alone, as in the old alliance battles in the preview event. Its becoming a little more "leet" now, than just having fun anymore.
pkodyssey
/Signed over and over and over again!