Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mosch
One last statement from someone who actually does sword fighting - Kendo.
I can not imagine why you would, in a real fight, let's say on a tournament, fight holding the sword upside down. Let's make a list of positive aspects you lose:
1)Range. There is no sword between you and your enemy so he will be able to just get in and whack away.
2)Strength. You usually attack in a whip-like motion originating from the hip. Of course that's impossible now.
3)Parry. How will you ever parry anything holding the sword the wrong way? If you're very lucky you might be able to block an attack to your torso (badly, I might add), but how are you going to defend yourself against an attack to the head?
4)Speed. You will first need to bring your sword towards your enemy by doing some kind of ballerina spin and then do a predictable strike.
5)Agility. Have you ever actually tried using your sword that way? I did. You may be the most nimble person in the land, you will really suffer a loss of agility because you shift your "attack zone" to your side.
6)Thrusts. As you have already said.
Holding your sword backwards introduces an interesting problem too. Imagine holding a double edges dword backwards. Did it? Are you in your ninja pose and everything? Now imagine someone whacking at the edge. Where does the other edge move and where does the sudden and intense pain come from?
There is one and only one positive aspect about fighting like this and that aspect is style. And as style is the only aspect that matters in a game, I welcome such a change into a game but I reserve the right to laugh at anybody who "proves" that fighting backhand in real life is a great idea.
|
The only real benefit aside from "looking interesting" would be the force of the initial strike delivered. Concealment would also be a possibility, but in using a full lenght sword, concealment seems largely out of the question. It would be similar to measuring the difference in force generated between a punch and an elbow. Easier to keep the force generated from the legs/hips with an elbow and not lose in in the elbow joint or wrist through a grazing hit or bending.
Like you said, range is shot to garbage (essentailly grappling distance) and guarding is difficult. Thrusting is possible, but slower/more predictable. I cant really think of a good "neutral" position for it as it seems more like something that is more ideal for a strike that originated from a sheath, but even then it could be easily done with a normal grip.
Still, someone in a more neutral position could just strike the arm along the wrist or the forearm before the blade came around with a reverse grip. I am not sure if there was a style that used the reverse grip primarially, but i highly doubt that it was a full length blade being imployed when doing so. Ive known references to the blade/weapon positioning as gyaku-mochi in a couple different places, but it always seems to be more of a transitional thing opposed to something done all the time.
Nakamura Ryu has some interesting reading within it, but it does reference towards brush strokes likening to sword technique.
http://www.webdiva4hire.com/kenshinkan/hapogir.html