Quote:
Originally Posted by lyra_song
The game doesnt take 3-4 years because the graphics engine, AI, animation, etc are already created.
All thats being made is new models/textures/quests/maps.
|
Is that not a weak sort of premise to make a retail game on then and then let it cost 50 US Dollars?
If it's not a sequel, but just an extension should it not just have been 20 Dollars or something?
I understand that making games is a business but this sort of raping-the-customers is worse than whatever SOE or EA has done to their fanbases?
Quote:
That would be singularly stupid, 90% of player will not have DX10 graphics cards or Vista by next year.
|
First of all, it was just an example. Secondly, I would very much like to borrow your time machine.
Quote:
Nonsense, most games do not develop their own engines anyway. The only other business model available would be a monthly subscription and in that case Anet will very likely lose a sizeable amount of players.
More and better trading of what? Uberitems? All that your suggestions will do is turn GW into a WoW clone
|
No I don't think so. I didn't enjoy WoW so that would be pretty silly. Why couldn't they just do what they are going to do at Flagship Studios with their hellgate?
They are going around and saying: "okay you can buy these little pieces. You want acces to Ritualist and all the skills? fine. Pay us 3-5 Dollars! You want the new lvl 20 campaign? fine pay 10 Dollars. You want Alliance Battles? fine pay us 5 Dollars". Or something like that... Oblivion is doing it that way.
And in many Korean games they have other alternative business models so I don't see were you are coming from.
Quote:
Anet never claimed it was an RPG, rewriting the story...you are joking, I hope?
|
http://www.guildwars.com/gameplay/synopsis/
There are pretty much hundreds of interviews were Anet has called GW an RPG.
And rewritting the story? No I was not joking. Obviously based on these and other fan forums most people have a serious problem with it and for some of us it ruins allot of the experience. Maybe they could just remove the story so we didn't had to deal with it?
Quote:
Basically, you want GW not to be GW but another game. A rather odd suggestion, if you ask me. I dont consider Factions very expensive compared to other games and what they call expansions nor do I consider it too small.
|
I was just boggled by it. I love Factions but im surprised how little time they took to actually make an effort out of it. There is barely an hour of music spanning across the campaign, and all dialouge and NPCs looks and feels exactly the same.
Just because a game runs on the same engine it does not mean it can not be improved. Grand Theft auto 3, Vice City and San Andreas all ran on the same renderware engine, and they all had massive improvements over each other.
So my entire point was.
GW = 5 Years in the making.
GWF = 1 year in the making.
Which does the community love? It's a pretty obvious answer, and it stands clear that while the games were priced exactly the same you didn't got as much as you paid for as the first time, even though you would expect a company to improve over it's intial flaws.
It reminds me of EA pushing out bad Harry Potter, James Bond and Lord of the Rings games every year and getting suckers to buy it, because they simply like the brand.
I like Factions but it has created so many new problems and many people seem more negative and hateful. It's like the entire game took a step backwards and the players are spread. People are dissapointed because they thought Factions would be much bigger.
Engine, and AI and all that might have already made but when you are paying full price for a game, any gamer would expect improvements in certain areas?
I guess my main grip is just the story. I really thought ArenaNet would listen to the players and say; "wow. They really don't care or enjoy being or learning about our world. we must do something to improve this!" But in reality it was like NPCs and all that was just rushed in like 5 minutes.
And now they already want Nightfall out. Why not trying to save some face and combine the teams and make an effort to satisfy some of the valid and constructive critisism?
If they want us to buy these 50 Dollars expansions for the next 10 years is it not fair that they try and make an effort to improve the core game in areas like grouping and trading and stuff?:8