Currently when you try to join an alliance battle you get "no opposing party" with no indication of if its because there aren't enough Luxon teams and/or there aren't enough Kurzick teams.
What I would like to see is that when you try to join an AB but can't you get the message:
"Not enough players. There are x Kurzick teams and y Luxon teams waiting to join an Alliance Battle"
The numbers will be the number of teams on each side that have clicked the enter mission button.
Now, although I dont do Fort Aspenwood or Jade Quarry, it seems that a simmilar message could work there.
show us how many teams are waiting for ABs
![]()
bilateralrope
![]()
bilateralrope
10 days with no reply at all. This seems a reasonable length of time before bumping it.
With this suggestion, if you were kurzick and got told that there were only 2 kurzick teams but 4 luxon ones, you would know to go tell the other kurzicks to form a team and join. But if you saw 8 Kurzick teams waiting, 2 Luxon you would know you would be in for a long wait.
With this suggestion, if you were kurzick and got told that there were only 2 kurzick teams but 4 luxon ones, you would know to go tell the other kurzicks to form a team and join. But if you saw 8 Kurzick teams waiting, 2 Luxon you would know you would be in for a long wait.
![]()
Tarun
/signed - There has been rumors that they only have limited servers for these things though. So who knows.
![]()
bilateralrope
I'm guessing the rumor isn't true, but came about when someone was waiting for a match and a friend was waiting for a match for the other side. It could of quite easily of been at 5 teams out of the 6 waiting.
But there is a limited number of servers for it, then they could say that the servers are full and you are at position x in the queue.
But untill I see proof of limited server numbers, I'm going to assume that ANET hasn't added such a limit, as I can see no reason why such a limit is useful for anyone.
But there is a limited number of servers for it, then they could say that the servers are full and you are at position x in the queue.
But untill I see proof of limited server numbers, I'm going to assume that ANET hasn't added such a limit, as I can see no reason why such a limit is useful for anyone.
![]()
Sientir
Such a limit is useful for ANet in terms of keep operating costs down. I do agree with the idea, however, so.../signed.
