How about Cap any Player?
I want to make Galie my personal pet...
OMG! Cap ANY PVE creature as your pet! [petition]...
actionjack
makosi
I'm using Charm Animal on Bladed Aatxe!
/notsigned
/notsigned
lightblade
OMFG!!! I WANT A MUSSAAT AS MY PET!!!
Of course that's just some sarcasm
/notsigned..
Of course that's just some sarcasm
/notsigned..
Shonmi Woolyhead
ooo -- but a level 20 pet rabit would so pwn!
heh -- killer rabbit --
/signed
heh -- killer rabbit --
/signed
Terra Xin
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dougal Kronik
Yes, does anyone know what an MPC is?
NPC = Non-Player Character. Meaning AI (not the player) controls these characters. |
hello, Monsters are NPC's too (slaps his hand on the paper) look!
Quote:
|
OMFG!!! I WANT A MUSSAAT AS MY PET!!! Of course that's just some sarcasm |
Quote:
|
How about Cap any Player? I want to make Galie my personal pet... |
ooo, you know what? I would like a devourer...
Quote:
| To mend the problem perhaps? Is death the only solution? I would trust that Melandru treasure's all life. Even those that have turned from her. |
But you have to consider, if she treasures all that is natural, then it's right to say that everything that happens, happens for a reason. If rangers kill monsters, it was meant to happen
Remember that druid quest where ou have to meet a bunch of spirits at the base of the waterfall? that's what I mean.
Death Syndrome
I think alot of people has his suggestion wrong, what I see is that he wants to be able to have a pet say tiger for example, then he wants to be able to do something to a troll to make his tiger look like a troll, but yet still continues to be a tiger (damage and armor wise). Thats how I see it
/Undecided
/Undecided
malignant-heretic
/unsigned
perhaps add a few more creatures to cap in presearing ie: Scales, devourers but not any enemy that would be stupid, specially seeing as, like some1 mentioned a person rushing pre, getting to droks capping a troll and basically just wrecking the whole balance of the game.
perhaps add a few more creatures to cap in presearing ie: Scales, devourers but not any enemy that would be stupid, specially seeing as, like some1 mentioned a person rushing pre, getting to droks capping a troll and basically just wrecking the whole balance of the game.
Bethany
Would it ever be so fun for my ranger to run along with a Hydra. Yes, it would but like it has been said, the balance issue would clearly be chaotic. But then again, I've always wanted that cutesy little rabbit on top of the waterfal in Pre as a pet. Oh well.
/unsigned
/unsigned
malignant-heretic
yeah i wanted that rabbit too lol 
a small lil bunny like that running up and ravaging charr lol, that would be class
a small lil bunny like that running up and ravaging charr lol, that would be class
Bethany
The cutesy rabbit running up to a Charr? Ah, I can almost smell the Mad Humping On the Leg skill coming up!
malignant-heretic
lol imagine if it grew like normal pets did, and youve got a cougar sided rabbit following u lol
Siren
Death Syndrome, THANK YOU. I've only seen four people in this entire thread actually read the OP's post carefully.
QFT
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Death Syndrome
I think alot of people has his suggestion wrong, what I see is that he wants to be able to have a pet say tiger for example, then he wants to be able to do something to a troll to make his tiger look like a troll, but yet still continues to be a tiger (damage and armor wise).
|
Bethany
Ok, I get it. Then I'd like the cutesy rabbit taking the form of a hydra and go on a mad humping spree. There. Oh, and I'd have the only hydra that nimbles on carrots.
Ecklipze
...
/notsigned
/notsigned
xiaotsu
We just got new pets, don't be greedy 
Although some monsters being tamable would be a nice addition and another plus to be at least part ranger, I'm not too worried about it, there are other things that need implemented/fixed before we get new pets...my greens for instance 
/notsigned - yet
Although some monsters being tamable would be a nice addition and another plus to be at least part ranger, I'm not too worried about it, there are other things that need implemented/fixed before we get new pets...my greens for instance /notsigned - yet
furiousfunk
I'd like to cap a Rat, the Bunny, The bull and the Fungal Wallow but taking bigger creatures would be unfair in the arena. Get a run to droks, charm a Jade Armor and go to the ascalon arena as a level 7 ranger and just dance as the jade owns the whole other team. When are they adding more pets, a bee swarm would be awesome or a swarm of bats.
Thom
How stupid is it to have a creature totally nerfed as soon as it is captured? Say you capture a level 22 scrab. As soon as it is captured it loses 2 levels and all of its skills. This makes as much sense to me as 9 skill slots. While I wouldn't mind some current skins being used for pets, it really wouldn't make sense to have every creature become exactly equivalent to a wolf as soon as it is captured.
As I currently understand the system, different creatures have different advantages. The ability to capture any NPC would totally destroy existing balance as well as sanity.
Keep up the "/not signed" guys.
As I currently understand the system, different creatures have different advantages. The ability to capture any NPC would totally destroy existing balance as well as sanity.
Keep up the "/not signed" guys.
Doofledust
/notsigned
I understand aout it only being the skin of the monster, none of the skills being available, but...
Say you charm a scarab and then join a PUG and fight a mob of scarabs, how much time will be wasted with people trying to target/kill your pet?
I understand aout it only being the skin of the monster, none of the skills being available, but...
Say you charm a scarab and then join a PUG and fight a mob of scarabs, how much time will be wasted with people trying to target/kill your pet?
Francis Demeules
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Doofledust
Say you charm a scarab and then join a PUG and fight a mob of scarabs, how much time will be wasted with people trying to target/kill your pet?
|
Well, fighting against "Animals" type (if they change for that Idea bc Animal type are only they can be charmed), think about Otyugh Cry.
/not signed
Vahn Roi
Now that I think about it, I wouldn't mind have a whiptail devourer like Old Mac.
Tongloid Tarthwood
Um...giant worms in South Shiverpeaks? As pets? I just saw a vision.
It was a vision of IWAY. With Giant Worms. My gosh.
What have you created?!
It was a vision of IWAY. With Giant Worms. My gosh.
What have you created?!
.neuronster.
You know, I was thinking that. However, not capping anyone. Just the creatures you're supposed to kill. That would be awesome.
/signed
/signed
shinrinningu
Gotta catch 'em all!
POKE-- oh wait... this is GW.
/not signed
POKE-- oh wait... this is GW.
/not signed
Jas D
Even if everyone liked it, I highly doubt any action would be taken into it.
Align
This'd be awesome, but it requires waaaaay too many exceptions.
Ranged creatures, white mantle, worms as was mentioned...
I'd rather have a Peaceful Devourer animal introduced.
Ranged creatures, white mantle, worms as was mentioned...
I'd rather have a Peaceful Devourer animal introduced.
Charqus
Itd be fun but unbalanced.........
OMG GLINT IS MY PWNZORS PET
/not sign
OMG GLINT IS MY PWNZORS PET
/not sign
Undivine
Well, it just doesn't seem right that a ranger, the guy who deals with animals, can charm non-animals. I'm going to have to say "no" to this one. Now if you'll allow him to charm scarabs, turtles, etc.... that makes sense.
/notsigned
P.S. I'm going to edit the OP's post to emphasize that he's talking about the LOOK of the enemy, and NOT the kills and level and power and everything.
/notsigned
P.S. I'm going to edit the OP's post to emphasize that he's talking about the LOOK of the enemy, and NOT the kills and level and power and everything.
sassoonssamson
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by HawkofStorms
/notsigned
I can see the griefing now. A ranger with not pet goes into Hell's Precipice with a group to do the mission. They get to the lich and the ranger casts charm animal on lich and then maps out. Mission failed (because you couldn't technicially kill the lich). It would be kinda cool (I can just see IWAY with all White Mantle Zealots as pets *shutter*), but pretty ridiculous. Plus it would create a whole bunch of stuff like that. Worried about the mursatt monk THK boss? Just bring a ranger with no pet and charm animal to take it out. Also, it would change the way EoE worked. EoE clumps all pets as being the same type of creature. That would get pretty confusing/wierd if your pet wasn't affected for killing a PvE creature with the exact same skin by EoE. |
lol i did that by capping black Moa on one of the quests
Shadow Dragon
/unsigned.
even though i'd love to get my hands on a armored cave spider from the fissure. i don't see this happening.
even though i'd love to get my hands on a armored cave spider from the fissure. i don't see this happening.
bulletsmile
maybe i'm the only one but..............
/signed
it would be a great idea to get more pets that we can catch, ofcourse we can't take those exstreme size enemies or bosses, only those who aren't wurm large can be captured, bosses can't be captured and all the enemies will be resized to more suitable sizes and they will act 100% as any other pets, also you can't cap in mission. also the new pet would get down to lv.5 and max is 20 + it wouldn't be any better than any other pets.
and i wonder why people are talking about unbalanced....
/signed
it would be a great idea to get more pets that we can catch, ofcourse we can't take those exstreme size enemies or bosses, only those who aren't wurm large can be captured, bosses can't be captured and all the enemies will be resized to more suitable sizes and they will act 100% as any other pets, also you can't cap in mission. also the new pet would get down to lv.5 and max is 20 + it wouldn't be any better than any other pets.
and i wonder why people are talking about unbalanced....
Jo0Lz
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Nanii
Trolls small as mini turtles,
Tundra GIANTS small as stalkers. Wurms small like black widow. That would look wierdo. Tiny tiny minotour, so cute so small You make me want to get a grawl Idea so bad This makes me sad.. no no no no no Not signed.. (Think before you post these ideas. Think of all the work) |
omny
I could see a variation of this work:
For birthdays, instead of getting a random minipet, you get a one use capture skill that can be used on (almost) any creature in the game. You receive the captured creature as a minipet.
Don't tell me it wouldn't be cool.
It will never happen though, unless someone pays A.Net a couple of mill to make it.
Still...
For birthdays, instead of getting a random minipet, you get a one use capture skill that can be used on (almost) any creature in the game. You receive the captured creature as a minipet.
Don't tell me it wouldn't be cool.
It will never happen though, unless someone pays A.Net a couple of mill to make it.
Still...
joobelix moo
Lol that woulg be stupid...
/unsign
/unsign
Sjeng
a pet bone dragon!! cooooolio!
And add a pet stable, so you can choose which captured pet to take at the tamer instead of permanently losing it. *drools* Although Í don't like pokemon, I do have that "gotta have em all" attitude...
And add a pet stable, so you can choose which captured pet to take at the tamer instead of permanently losing it. *drools* Although Í don't like pokemon, I do have that "gotta have em all" attitude...