As most of you know, Sundering STILL less deals damage than the Vampiric mod.
Sundering has more weaknesses than the Vampiric mod, therefor I believe it should deal significantly more damage than Vampiric (or atleast equal to).
Sundering triggers on a "chance", theoreticaly, 1 out of every 5 hits. If you miss the attack it triggers on, you're screwed, whereas if you miss an attack with Vampiric, it doesn't really mean much.
I believe the Sundering mod should atleast be 20 Sundering/40 chance.
Buff Sundering Again
3 pages • Page 1
n
Then it would be better than Vampiric. The degen is countered only if you are constantly attacking (normally, attack rate is 1 hit per 1.33 sec, so you can do 3 swings every 4 seconds. So that is 9 hp stolen, but you degened 8hp). So assuming your target doesn't kite (only time this is true is in PvE), you basically come even. If sundering does the same damage, then you don't have to worry about fleeing enemies (because you would degen during this time) and you don't even have to think about switching weapons.
Sundering would be OK if it comes out to about 2 more damage per attack. I'm not sure exactly how much more damage it does right now.
Sundering would be OK if it comes out to about 2 more damage per attack. I'm not sure exactly how much more damage it does right now.
Except for the fact that even if you're being kited, the degan from Vamp doesn't even = -1, the "disadvantage" is hardly even worth mentioning, considering the fact that Sundering will always be dependant on chance and the enemies armor, wheras Vamp is an unconditional damage boost that provides +1 health regan in the right situations.
And being lazy (not switching weapons) shouldn't be brought into an argument of effectiveness because it is not a true disadvantage.
And being lazy (not switching weapons) shouldn't be brought into an argument of effectiveness because it is not a true disadvantage.
Z
hm.......
i think that the whole fuzz about the sundering is because nobody realy knows how much more damage you are dealing per hit.
i mean how much extra damage 20% of armor penetration does? i used a skill calculator and was deeply disapointed. my bow being at 10% was doin only +1.6 or something like that. now at 20% its peobaBLY doin the double. also dont forget the key word "% chance"
i think that vampiric should always be stronger, becuase as Zui said"
i think that the whole fuzz about the sundering is because nobody realy knows how much more damage you are dealing per hit.
i mean how much extra damage 20% of armor penetration does? i used a skill calculator and was deeply disapointed. my bow being at 10% was doin only +1.6 or something like that. now at 20% its peobaBLY doin the double. also dont forget the key word "% chance"
i think that vampiric should always be stronger, becuase as Zui said"
Quote:
| Sundering should NEVER surpass vampiric. The fact of the matter is Vampiric actualy has a drawback. Sundering does not. |
Tarun
Technician's Corner Moderator
http://www.lunarsoft.net/ http://forums.lunarsoft.net/
Joined Jan 2006
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tarun
Either buff sundering, or remove the stupid degen from vampiric.
/signed |
seriously...that's a ridiculous change
They should just make sundering a 10% or possibly 20% permanent bonus considering Strength is only useful for sprint
Vampiric and Zealous are fine, if anything should get a buff it's Furious
T

