Now i know many people have been complaining about leeching, and ive begun to think on a plan.
Negative Points System
The system works, by giving users negative points that count against that user. It is an account wide effect and cannot be removed, unless that person quests alot and shows improvment since the incident.
After X (im thinking of 7 ) Number of points the user gains, He or she will be BANNED from PVP Arenas.
After X (im thinking of 10 here) Number of points, the user is banned from ALL live teams, including instances, missions, pvp arenas, and anywhere else he can team with a real human.
The user will have to lose ALL his negative points or he will be stuck with henchies for eternity. On a sidenot, IF the user losse's ALL his negative points, but then is found afking again, He will be perma-banned from live times.
How to gain Negative points: Now this is the hard part, and obviously the most hard to implement. I have thought of this.
At the end of the Mission/PVP mission/etc, The users total number of Steps and the total time of that mission are averaged out. If the users steps per every 30 seconds is Extremely low (im thinking 30 seconds, with maybe an average of 2 or below steps) Then that user is Awarded a shiny Negative point.
Ive been thinking about flaws, But i seriously cannot find a reason why a person wouldnt move at all during a pvp/pve mission.
PVP= kiting
PVe= Gotta finish the story and kite?
I know it might be a small burden on casters, But their average should be higher then the 2 for every 30 seconds. If its found to problamatic though, maybe the time should be increased to 45 seconds?
For BRB users, Ive also come up with a solution. When a person is in AWAY mode his total time is shortened by 5 minutes. For any normal person that is enough and should suffice to increase their average per 30/45 seconds.
This solution is for missions and pvp areas only. Instances should NOT be covered by this. and lastly, i can forsee runs might have problems. Though some people like to aFK during runs, this would make them stay and maybe eliminate (?) those 2 people that dont pay?\
- This idea is open for discussion, any suggestions are greatly appreciated
s

, And i did mention a user would have to stay on a run. Guess its not an accepted system