15 Jul 2005 at 11:33 - 16
I tend to agree with the fact to take what people at gaming stores tell you with a grain of salt, until they prove themselves. For example, I have quite the repoire with a couple guys at my local GameStop. They've always told me factual information. Even when their computer gets updated with "release dates" they always tell me something like, "usually our computer dates are wrong until an official announcement is made from the publisher".
So, yeah, I doubt what he said has any basis in fact. >_>
But, truth be told, if they did start charging for Guild Wars, I'd pay to play it. I'm so used to it now. I wanted to play GW before I found out that it was going to be free to play. If you enjoy a game enough, you'll pay for it. Other companies like Square-Enix and Blizzard have absolutely no problem with a large player base and they charge for their games.
In fact, if ANet did charge for GW (not saying they will, mind you, just IF), you can bet there would be a lot of improvements and changes, a lot more than there are now, and they would possibly be inclined to include stuff in free updates that they would normaly put in an expansion and make you pay for. Not to knock GW or anything, 'cause I love the game, but you get what you pay for, and there are distinct, noticable differences in the quality of "free" games like GW compared to games like Final Fantasy XI which you pay monthly for.