Monk and elementalist. I know there is a thread like this on the second page (well after I post this it will be), but alot of it is "W/Mo or W/E" and I was wondering if you put those aside what secondary do you like?
.:reasons for not wanting monk or elementalist: Monk is played so often and I have a main character which is an elementalist:.
Good warrior secondary besides....
The Warbringer
newfangle
You can do a lot of neat things with a ranger as a secondary class. Hell, you could even take marksmanship and become a bow-tank. Just look down the skills list and pick things that you like. There is no "best combo" in GW, which is why it is uber.
Yukito Kunisaki
If neither W/Mo or W/E is to your liking, why not W/N?
Lots of their touch spells are perfect for a warrior due to range.
W/Me is good for just stealing energy and using it to hammer your enemies down with unblockable hits or just plain pain...
Lots of their touch spells are perfect for a warrior due to range.
W/Me is good for just stealing energy and using it to hammer your enemies down with unblockable hits or just plain pain...