I've never flamed anyone in my life, although I have been flamed and I certainly don't intend to start now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatalis
I'm not saying what you're say I'm saying at all. It is the real world currency that holds an objective value, and Guild Wars gold with a value particular only to a given person. Which doesn't make it (the value) any less real.
|
Yes I understand that, that why I said it would be nice if the value wasn't real to them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatalis
Also, I would like to ask you how exactly do you think our experience is "marred" by these sellers?
|
Well, heh, to be honest you've actually caught me a little there. I have not had the game very long, so I have not experienced the days of glorious loot. So currently I am satisfied with what I have, not really knowing anything better. But, if Anet's solution to Bots is to nerf, then that too will go downhill. Currently, that seems to be the only solution to Bots that they have come up with, or decided to implement. To Nerf...I have read their statement regarding how they are trying to solve the problem which might have unfortunate consequences for players - it's somewhere on their website...So thing is, until they decide to do something different, they are going to keep nerfing because of the bots, and it looks like things might get worse before they get better. That's how I see bots affecting the game experience.
Here's the thing though - I'm not holding out for a fix all - I mean look at the advertisements that scroll across the top of this forum, all the popular online games have been affected by botting and ebay sellers. With that much trouble that none of these game companies seem capable of solving, it might be a long time (or never) before we see a solution that might not adversely affect players.
I don't see just dumping tons of gold in as a solution either. What happens when you drop tons of money into an economy? As I understand it (economists feel free to correct me) It becomes worthless and inflation hits the roof. The Japanese found this out in WWII when they overprinted money to create the famous - worthless, banana notes. You'd have to carry a plastic bag full just to buy a tiny bar of soap, and it would still be out of reach of the poor. The black market kicks in, and who can afford those items? The rich.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatalis
So why is it that getting gold and items has been made so hard?
|
Actually, it's not horrendously hard, I think it's worse if you're waiting for items to drop for you, but getting gold itself isn't too hard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatalis
The sellers are just satisfying a demand, not scamming others. Stop trying to enforce your gaming style on people who aren't as grindfest-loving as you, and spare us your zeal and intolerance. It's not even in A.Net's interests to ban them, because it would hurt the future sales.
|
No they are not scamming, but what they are doing is certainly illegal. Of course, the point of argument to that is that we shouldn't be "policing" what is or is not illegal. But the game companies have made it abundantly clear that it is, and they will try to put a stop to it. I have questioned whether or not they really do ban the accounts, and I think they do. Secondly, it's not possible to force these players into anything, as is clear from their proliferation. Most people are just expressing an opinion, they won't actually be able to stop them cold. It's like the hydra.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fatalis
Note that I have never used eBay or any other similar service except for Amazon.com in my life, and I don't intend to in the near future. So this is not an justification to buying gold from farmbotters or sweatshop workers, it's just a protest against the stupid groupthink in these forums.
|
Well, there's an interesting debate right there. Sweatshop workers are downtrodden, get no rights, are poorly paid and only serve to make the man on top as rich as possible. But they are there because they feel that being poor is better than being dirt poor. Even that $1.50 an hour is preferable to nothing. So what happens? We raid the sweatshop and send them on their way back to being "worse off" because it is "good for them" to not be toiling under abusive conditions. Yet it is also terrible if we don't, it's possible to try for alternate forms of aid, but you can't catch everyone who slips through the cracks. - Anyway, back to the quote...
"stupid groupthink" - and I will call myself a hypocrite right here because I know there are times when I believe that phrase too. But still, it's a double edged sword. Even minorities are groups that engage in groupthink. All people engage in groupthink it just depends on what side you're on for you not to understand the other. I think you're doing a great job of trying to understand the botters and ebay sellers, but unfair to simply label the other side of players "stupid groupthink" without doing the same justice you have given to them.