can we get the +5 energy swords back please?
maxpower
please give 'em back
i'm trying to get one for my monk but people ask for 100k or more =/
i'm trying to get one for my monk but people ask for 100k or more =/
Jetdoc
I think you answered your own question - the swords were designed for warriors, but it seems that spellcasters (especially monks) use them the most. That's why they got nerfed. I think they're gone for good...
Blue Steel
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetdoc
I think you answered your own question - the swords were designed for warriors, but it seems that spellcasters (especially monks) use them the most. That's why they got nerfed. I think they're gone for good...
|
All that being said, I might have one kicking around, but I think they are or will be worth far more than 100K soon enough.
DreamCatcher
These swords are definately not gone for good. they are still there and available to the rich exclusively. I think it's clear why these swords are overpowered and thus will give the richer PvP'ers a totaly unfair advantage over anyone who hasn't got that sword.
Either all examples of that sword should be whiped, Limited in some other way or brought back or PvP will belong to the rich instead of the skilled
Either all examples of that sword should be whiped, Limited in some other way or brought back or PvP will belong to the rich instead of the skilled
d4nowar
I still have one, and I'm keeping that thing until I see it go for 400k.
brute blake
but cant monks have a wand with +12 energy and a off hand with +12 energy??
Kakumei
Quote:
Originally Posted by brute blake
but cant monks have a wand with +12 energy and a off hand with +12 energy??
|
cagan
You can fairly cheaply get a +5 energy >50 wand in trade, which really isn't a whole lot worse.
One and Two
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kakumei
wands don't have energy bonuses
|
aron searle
I think that they should either bring them back or delete them permanantly, its not fair that only the rich can have them.
Personally i would like to see them come back, then my warrior may actually use swords for once.
Personally i would like to see them come back, then my warrior may actually use swords for once.
Naprius
a nice example of why the "it isnt all about money you know" - argument is bullshit
Okae
If you're intent on getting a one handed weapon with +5 always energy and don't care about modding it or the dmg it does... then there's a collector outside of Nolani's Academy that gives a fire wand for 3 charr carvings with +5 energy all the time.
It says it requires 5 fire, but I use it on my N/Me and I still get the +5 energy bonus.
It says it requires 5 fire, but I use it on my N/Me and I still get the +5 energy bonus.
Kakumei
Quote:
Originally Posted by One and Two
Wands can have up to +15, but you also get the penalty of -1 regen.
|
i stand corrected
unienaule
However, the wand is clearly inferior. You cannot put a +20 enchant on the wand.
Makkert
Interesting discussion.
Different approach: should this sword be nerfed?
If it is considered overpowered, why spare it from nerfing? Why stop at skills with gamebalancing?
Different approach: should this sword be nerfed?
If it is considered overpowered, why spare it from nerfing? Why stop at skills with gamebalancing?