probably the best shield out there for a W/Mo; Mo/W. What cause me to ask for a price check on this, is because i have never seen a shield with both these mods maxed out, let alone it's a req8. and as we all know 88% of all warriors secondary are monks; that's another reason why this shield should be in high value. i had a few guesstimates from friends... wouldn't hurt to get more though. so here it is..
PC Req8 Buckler.
coolyguy
to me, this is one of the best looking buckler, out of the 3.
probably the best shield out there for a W/Mo; Mo/W. What cause me to ask for a price check on this, is because i have never seen a shield with both these mods maxed out, let alone it's a req8. and as we all know 88% of all warriors secondary are monks; that's another reason why this shield should be in high value. i had a few guesstimates from friends... wouldn't hurt to get more though. so here it is..

probably the best shield out there for a W/Mo; Mo/W. What cause me to ask for a price check on this, is because i have never seen a shield with both these mods maxed out, let alone it's a req8. and as we all know 88% of all warriors secondary are monks; that's another reason why this shield should be in high value. i had a few guesstimates from friends... wouldn't hurt to get more though. so here it is..
derrtyboy69
Possibly 200-300k. Although if some rich W/Mos gettin fightin about, I Wouldnt be surprised to see a 400k price mark, as this shield is nearly one of a kind. Although that would be a very generous offer. And yes the best looking Buckler.
Jetdoc
Very interesting shield - I'd actually say that a Mo/W would be more interested in this shield than a W/Mo (because the damage reduction mod is much better than the small benefit you get from the +1 healing prayers).
For the right buyer because of uniqueness, I'd target around 250K, especially with the low requirement.
For the right buyer because of uniqueness, I'd target around 250K, especially with the low requirement.
capitalist
200k. The +1 to healing prayers is nice, but not neccessary in the least.