It just seems so...pointless...
Demonstar
I wouldn't use it.
:/
:/
Hooray Nuke
might be good for some obssesed marks ranger, dunno.
Hockster
Starting to see a lot more drops with 13 requirements. Merchant fodder for the most part.
Sol_Vie
I'm making a marks ranger, but I need half moons..
nightrunner
Fooey... and such a shiny inherent mod too
But you'd never hit a critical with that.
But you'd never hit a critical with that.
Demonstar
Quote:
Originally Posted by nightrunner
Fooey... and such a shiny inherent mod too
But you'd never hit a critical with that. Unless you have 16 marks, and even then the chances are slim. *Cuddles his req8 bow*
:3
But you'd never hit a critical with that. Unless you have 16 marks, and even then the chances are slim. *Cuddles his req8 bow*
:3
LifeInfusion
Lol. 13 req marks...Use sup marks and 10 marks attribute points...
:/
:/
nightrunner
Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeInfusion
Lol. 13 req marks...Use sup marks and 10 marks attribute points...
:/ Obviously. But the point is, your chance of hitting a crit is very low.
:/ Obviously. But the point is, your chance of hitting a crit is very low.
heist23
i'm a marks ranger, i don't give a damn about the reqs. as long as it's max dmg and has nice enough mods.
Hooray Nuke
you have to give a damn about req, if you dont then how do you care about the max dmg part?
Vermilion Okeanos
it is pretty bad...
the mod is for health below, and the best health below one can get is 20%
the mod is for health below, and the best health below one can get is 20%
killson
i got at least 10 items with reg 13 today alone ..... useless if you ask me
Cymmina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demonstar
Unless you have 16 marks, and even then the chances are slim.
Um, what does the req have to do with criticals? I've seen this same bs statement made before with absolutely no evidence to back it up. The requirement only does one thing: determines if you do base damage or the damage listed on the bow. I refuse to believe otherwise, unless someone would like to post some *real* proof.