I know it's typically best to go after that uber lynchpin Monk first, but sometimes, isn't it ok to just smash a weak youngling who strays too far from the herd?
I hate it when my group gets mad when I do that. I'll certainly switch targets if it isn't over quick, but am I wrong in not ALWAYS getting the monk or mesmer first? Frankly it pisses me off when people always assume that monk or mez is the first target no matter what, unless for some very specific strategic agreed-to purpose.
Opinions for both CA/TA and Tombs appreciated.
Is It Wrong to Prey on the Weak?
Ole Man Bourbon
Former Ruling
Most people will say - well if their "weaklings" already - They probably wont effect the game too much anyways - So it is still important to stay on the weaker "stronglings".
Unless you are in CA - then everyone there is for faction anyway - so a Kill is a Kill, you get faction whether its a monk or "weakling".
(Unless by "Weakling" you didnt mean a softie noobie character, but rather just an Ele or w/e that walked too far from monk - thats a different case, and jsut be accessed on the fly through TS/Vent).
Unless you are in CA - then everyone there is for faction anyway - so a Kill is a Kill, you get faction whether its a monk or "weakling".
(Unless by "Weakling" you didnt mean a softie noobie character, but rather just an Ele or w/e that walked too far from monk - thats a different case, and jsut be accessed on the fly through TS/Vent).
Savio
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...ad.php?t=86320
Yay, I found a thread asking the same thing! Closed.
Yay, I found a thread asking the same thing! Closed.