PC -2/-3 Eternal req9

mantxi

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Hell Lambs [HL]

Mo/Me

15 Dec 2005 at 10:24 - 1
Eternal shield
Armor 16 (req9 strength)
Damage -3 (8%)
Damage -2 (Stance)

thank you

CoCantz

CoCantz

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Aug 2005

Denmark, EU

N/

15 Dec 2005 at 10:32 - 2
Well... I got this Tall shield:

16 armor (req. 9 tactics)
-2 w.encahnted
-2 w.stance

and its PCéd is here:
http://guildwarsguru.com/forum/showthread.php?t=93835

...and eternal should be worth more than tall so...

mantxi

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Hell Lambs [HL]

Mo/Me

15 Dec 2005 at 10:38 - 3
but -2 enchanted and -3 (8%) are not the same... maybe if it were 10%...

well, but i really have no idea so i might be wrong (hpe so lol).

ty CoCantz

mantxi

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Hell Lambs [HL]

Mo/Me

16 Dec 2005 at 13:06 - 4
i need a second opinion plz

JMFD

JMFD

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Apr 2005

Looking...

E/

16 Dec 2005 at 13:37 - 5
I had a -3 (hexed) and -2 (stance) eternal go for 100k, but thats more ideal for runners

morphium

morphium

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Jul 2005

Random Arenas int dis 1

W/

16 Dec 2005 at 13:40 - 6
~100k

mantxi

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Hell Lambs [HL]

Mo/Me

16 Dec 2005 at 13:53 - 7
ok, thanks everybody ^^

voutlaw

voutlaw

Banned

Join Date: Oct 2005

Lions Dis 1

The Evil That Men Do [SiN]

W/Mo

16 Dec 2005 at 15:20 - 8
80k~~

CoCantz

CoCantz

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Aug 2005

Denmark, EU

N/

16 Dec 2005 at 15:38 - 9
well ok... I just left info and not a pc... I would say around the 80k aswell.

Taken into consideration -3 chance 8% vs. -2 w.enchanted. I would take -2 and then this is eternal... the 80k is the value imo