Quivers For Rangers
Lord Cooper
id like to see a warrior with all the hammers axes swords and shields strapped to his back. that way he cant move because of all the weight and he is a sitting duck for my elementalist
or maybe all the hammers in your belt pouch pull your trousers down randomly in the middle of a fight causing you to fall over.. possibly impaling yourself on your sword?
seriously give rangers a cosmetic quiver. if they are using a longbow make it a back quiver.. short bows horn bows etc etc get hip quivers
or maybe all the hammers in your belt pouch pull your trousers down randomly in the middle of a fight causing you to fall over.. possibly impaling yourself on your sword?
seriously give rangers a cosmetic quiver. if they are using a longbow make it a back quiver.. short bows horn bows etc etc get hip quivers
MysticoN
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord Cooper
id like to see a warrior with all the hammers axes swords and shields strapped to his back. that way he cant move because of all the weight and he is a sitting duck for my elementalist
or maybe all the hammers in your belt pouch pull your trousers down randomly in the middle of a fight causing you to fall over.. possibly impaling yourself on your sword? seriously give rangers a cosmetic quiver. if they are using a longbow make it a back quiver.. short bows horn bows etc etc get hip quivers |
quickmonty
It is a fantasy world with magic. Being able to stuff a couple of tons of crafting materials into a backpack (that doesn't even appear on your back) is not possible in real life. I tend to just think of it as some magical ability and just play and enjoy the game.
/not signed
/not signed
Arknow
agree with monty, its magic so let it look like magic, thoguh quivers would give a more solid :ranger: look,
how about this, just a plain ol quiver, nothing special but -maybe- a bit of atkspeed bonus,nothing crazy, cap at like 10%, after all, quivers are supposed to make it all easier right?
how about this, just a plain ol quiver, nothing special but -maybe- a bit of atkspeed bonus,nothing crazy, cap at like 10%, after all, quivers are supposed to make it all easier right?
Sister Spice
I dont see why Rangers couldnt have one handed bows. Short bows/ recurves could be one handed while long bows / flat bows could be two handed. Thus if you played with a one handed bow you could play with an offhand (ie quiver)
This is just the same as warriors having the option of swords (one handed) or hammers (two handed)
If that was done then perhaps the 'one handed' bows would only have one mod whereas the big bows would have two. The quiver could then add the equivalent of the missing mods (ie as someone suggested - sundering / poisonous etc arrows) while the bigger bows would have the option of having the mod added directly.
There are advantages and disadvantages about bows due to range - these could stay and so be part of the calculation people would need to make when deciding what to go for.
Spice
This is just the same as warriors having the option of swords (one handed) or hammers (two handed)
If that was done then perhaps the 'one handed' bows would only have one mod whereas the big bows would have two. The quiver could then add the equivalent of the missing mods (ie as someone suggested - sundering / poisonous etc arrows) while the bigger bows would have the option of having the mod added directly.
There are advantages and disadvantages about bows due to range - these could stay and so be part of the calculation people would need to make when deciding what to go for.
Spice
fiery
I wonder why people complain about an unlimited supply of arrows.
Agreed, quivers would give more appearance to the ranger but still, if you want a quiver go outside of the house, grab a stick, string, a rock, and ta-da a QUIVER!
Agreed, quivers would give more appearance to the ranger but still, if you want a quiver go outside of the house, grab a stick, string, a rock, and ta-da a QUIVER!
quickmonty
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sister Spice
I dont see why Rangers couldnt have one handed bows. Short bows/ recurves could be one handed while long bows / flat bows could be two handed. Thus if you played with a one handed bow you could play with an offhand (ie quiver)
This is just the same as warriors having the option of swords (one handed) or hammers (two handed) If that was done then perhaps the 'one handed' bows would only have one mod whereas the big bows would have two. The quiver could then add the equivalent of the missing mods (ie as someone suggested - sundering / poisonous etc arrows) while the bigger bows would have the option of having the mod added directly. There are advantages and disadvantages about bows due to range - these could stay and so be part of the calculation people would need to make when deciding what to go for. Spice |
Dougal Kronik
Quote:
Originally Posted by fiery
I wonder why people complain about an unlimited supply of arrows.
Agreed, quivers would give more appearance to the ranger but still, if you want a quiver go outside of the house, grab a stick, string, a rock, and ta-da a QUIVER! |
fiery
Well you need to make them yourself seeing your quiver is gunna be empty.
Dj Tano
Actually it would be a nice thing to see candycane weapons shoot special candycane arrows/energy-balls
Symeon
/signed
Quivers would be great. I don't think we should just assume that it is 'magical' and 'doesn't have to be realistic' like the backpack. It would be a nice visual, and could be toggled on and off. Bow string visuals could also be added and have a toggle.
Indexed.
Quivers would be great. I don't think we should just assume that it is 'magical' and 'doesn't have to be realistic' like the backpack. It would be a nice visual, and could be toggled on and off. Bow string visuals could also be added and have a toggle.
Indexed.
Hunter Sharparrow
Quote:
Ever try to fire a bow (other than a cross bow) with one hand? And no snide comments about using your teeth to draw the string. |
Arduin
Visual quiver /signed
Now off to get some ecto and shards, to get me a FoW-armor-quiver
Now off to get some ecto and shards, to get me a FoW-armor-quiver
R A C
/signed for quiver for cosmetic purposes.
But gimmie string first. Would a string be that hard? I mean, seriously. It's not like "OH NOES! The performance drop from bowstrings will kill the game!" or anything.
But gimmie string first. Would a string be that hard? I mean, seriously. It's not like "OH NOES! The performance drop from bowstrings will kill the game!" or anything.
Maria The Princess
/signed
Lepton CFd
/mostdefinitelysigned
When I first started playing GW during May Preview Event, whatever it was, I created a Ranger. One of the first things I noticed was that I didn't have a quiver! =( I wouldn't mind if ANet just added a standard quiver to every ranger, or if they actually made it a true part of the game (such as different types of quivers with different stats...I believe someone mentioned hip/back quivers and such). Either way, show us where the Rangers are getting their arrows from! It's annoying!!!
As for having to buy arrows, I wouldn't care if you had to or not. But a quiver is NECESSARY.
When I first started playing GW during May Preview Event, whatever it was, I created a Ranger. One of the first things I noticed was that I didn't have a quiver! =( I wouldn't mind if ANet just added a standard quiver to every ranger, or if they actually made it a true part of the game (such as different types of quivers with different stats...I believe someone mentioned hip/back quivers and such). Either way, show us where the Rangers are getting their arrows from! It's annoying!!!
As for having to buy arrows, I wouldn't care if you had to or not. But a quiver is NECESSARY.
Terra Xin
Quivers and bow strings.... that's all we need.
As much as id like to see a ranger run out of arrows in mid PvP, I don't plan on seeing that happening.
As much as id like to see a ranger run out of arrows in mid PvP, I don't plan on seeing that happening.
Hunter Sharparrow
In the end the best option would be just a cosmetic change. It has no impact on the game play as in it won't increase or decrease or even change the rangers class in any way. Seeing your previously used weapon slung on you back (as long as you still have it on you person) would be nice as well. It would work for those that have multiple weapon sets and for when you enter a town. What ever weapon you were holding when you or your party enters a town would either be strapped to your back or hooked at your side.
Reminds me of BoodRayne.
Reminds me of BoodRayne.
God's Will
For cosmetic purposes shure.
Perhaps you could buy different types of quivers for fashion and such (fow quiver?). For bowstrings i would love to be able to see a visual difference btw the different strings. For example, a fire string would have a think line of flame, poison would be green mist, bleeding would be red mist, and so on.
Perhaps you could buy different types of quivers for fashion and such (fow quiver?). For bowstrings i would love to be able to see a visual difference btw the different strings. For example, a fire string would have a think line of flame, poison would be green mist, bleeding would be red mist, and so on.
bringer di morte
/signed
They just shouldn't give any bonuses or armor, or they would be disrupting the balance. Otherwise they would have to replace a piece of already existing ranger armor.
They just shouldn't give any bonuses or armor, or they would be disrupting the balance. Otherwise they would have to replace a piece of already existing ranger armor.
Meneldil
what?? Factions has been released, but still NO QUIVERS!!
Vermilion
Maybe its been said, but I don't see why Rangers should have quivers and other classes nada. I wouldn't mind if all classes got something. (sheaths, etc)
Str0b0
Why? What possible purpose could it serve? Haven't you noticed? This is the magical land of Tyria and in Tyria the magical arrow faeries bring you arrows as you need them. Quivers will anger the arrow faeries and then rangers will become nerfed as they futiley try to beat enemies to death with their bows.
/not signed in order to avoid the faeries' wrath
/not signed in order to avoid the faeries' wrath
Trylo
ok this all goes back to the bow strings and fuzzy armor conversations, and theres simple reasons:
1) GW is meant for the community people, some who dont have highpowered comps and stuff like that so they take out the unnecasary little things, and make armor of other chars in outposts a little less defined than yours, bow strings would also be taxing on these people's computers *ddep breath*. This makes for less comp power
2) If GW added some of these, as said above, some people would just lag out all the time and GW would lose some of their costumers, and yes that would be bad .
1) GW is meant for the community people, some who dont have highpowered comps and stuff like that so they take out the unnecasary little things, and make armor of other chars in outposts a little less defined than yours, bow strings would also be taxing on these people's computers *ddep breath*. This makes for less comp power
2) If GW added some of these, as said above, some people would just lag out all the time and GW would lose some of their costumers, and yes that would be bad .
PureEvilYak
I can see why having bowstrings and stuff would be laggy, but a quiver is just a quiver! The arrows could just be stationary, and you wouldn't actually see one pulled out when you attack with a bow. It would just be an addition to the armor, like assassins have thousands of knives.
The only problem is when you get, say, a monk or an ele using a bow. But they can just conjure up an arrow fairy. I'm a ranger. I deserve somewhere else to store my arrows except... there...
/signed
The only problem is when you get, say, a monk or an ele using a bow. But they can just conjure up an arrow fairy. I'm a ranger. I deserve somewhere else to store my arrows except... there...
/signed
Dark Suoon
quivers would be pretty cool
o and i was thinking about that like a couple months ago... lol
/signed
o and i was thinking about that like a couple months ago... lol
/signed
unda dawg
not only quivers...i think u shood ahve to buy arrows like 100g for 1000 arrows so like cheap but u still have to buy them cuz even if u have a quiver they still wood pop out of no where. quivers shood also have stats like part of an armor set.
PureEvilYak
Quote:
Originally Posted by unda dawg
not only quivers...i think u shood ahve to buy arrows like 100g for 1000 arrows so like cheap but u still have to buy them cuz even if u have a quiver they still wood pop out of no where. quivers shood also have stats like part of an armor set.
|
Meneldil
still waiting for my quiver, arena net.....
BigTru
Make quivers for rnagers, A.net. gogogogoogogogogogooogogoogogogogogogogoogogogoogo ogoo
Opeth11
You sure have been waiting for a while.
Embodiment Of Gaia
/signed for quivers (for cosmetic purposes)
The Afflicted Rangers have quivers, so why not us Anet? Check their animation, it's just the way it should be for rangers imo.
/signed for bowstrings
The animation on the bows are very nice (the way they bend), but why no bowstrings? I can't imagine that it really will cause lag issues.
Hmm, and the animating glowing stuff on certain weapon skins and for example the piece of cloth that hangs from the broadsword (moves like a cape), will also cause lag?
I'm no expert on this but I don't think this will be a big issue.
The Afflicted Rangers have quivers, so why not us Anet? Check their animation, it's just the way it should be for rangers imo.
/signed for bowstrings
The animation on the bows are very nice (the way they bend), but why no bowstrings? I can't imagine that it really will cause lag issues.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trylo
2) If GW added some of these, as said above, some people would just lag out all the time and GW would lose some of their costumers, and yes that would be bad .
|
I'm no expert on this but I don't think this will be a big issue.
Shadow Dragon
While on that subject i'd like to see the sheath for that massive fellblade i'm wielding
/signed
/signed
BeowulfKamdas
it would be cool but I doubt ANet will go through all the trouble to adding the quiver graphic which would cost time and make them no money XD
Iago Di LeMoix
I noticed this thread as i was reading through stuff (my first post here, just signed up) and thought i'd add my own lil 2 cents. My very first character was a ranger, the day my small town actually got Guild Wars (about 2 weeks after it came out). Yes, i believe a quiver should be equipted with the bow in the second hand slot. there should be a cosmetic image for any character armed with a bow, however, there should also be items that are "magical" that can be placed in the secondhand slot. now, before i go confusing myself and others, allow me to explain jsut a little bit. If you're going to use a bow... you're going to have a quiver.. period. So all bows will give you the "basic" quiver grafic. quiver "items" should be items that will replace the "basic" quiver. These items could have very minor bonuses on them. Nothing like an energy focus mind you, a ranger with a +12 energy quiver would just be slightly painful.. I'd say the quiver should be upgraded with the different condition lengthening types of arrows "poison, bleeding, etc.." however, due to anet already doing it with the strings, it would be a giant pain for them to do that. so just make them give a minor bonus... default being half of a focus, ei +6 energy (req 9 marksmanship). blue, purple, gold, or green quivers could give bonuses such as (max suggestions here) +15 health, +6 armor (to all, phyiscal, or elemental), or possibly Attack Skill (and only BOW attacks) recharge time (not more than 1 or 2 seconds for any skill, and no skill can be lowered below 1 second recharge). Basically, put a quiver image, but also allow that image to be changed with the quiver item, and allow minor bonuses for the quiver.
Sir Velron Rosemoon
Quivers.... Gotta wanna needa bo.... I mean quiver....
/signed with john handcock
/signed with john handcock
X I
It should be just an appearance on leggings.
/signed
/signed
anonymous
/not signed
I'm not up for cosmetical changes until some gameplay things are fixed. I would much rather have an auction house or a rejoin feature then something as miniscule as a quiver. I mean come on, does it matter?
I'm not up for cosmetical changes until some gameplay things are fixed. I would much rather have an auction house or a rejoin feature then something as miniscule as a quiver. I mean come on, does it matter?
RTSFirebat
I if A.net created a extra slot to put Quivers on your back, then yes.
If it changed the limit of arrows then no.
At the end of the day it really doesn't matter. As long as there is balance.
If it changed the limit of arrows then no.
At the end of the day it really doesn't matter. As long as there is balance.
CmOo_WtFaCk
/signed
i like the idea of having quivers seems awkward without one
i like the idea of having quivers seems awkward without one