Fortitude or defense mod?

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

I have a customized barbed shinobi blade with +5 energy and +20%. Which would be better a defense mod, or fortitude mod? I already own sentinals armor, so i was wondering if the extra AL would do nothing much....

SparhawkJC

SparhawkJC

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Mar 2006

The Amazon Basin

R/Me

Eh...shouldn't have customized it, +5 energy mods are for runners and casters not for warriors. As far as defense or fortitude. Defense will prevent more damage in the long run than fortitude, however fortitude gives you a health buffer against degen and armor ignoring damage so choose whichever you're more afraid of.

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

i only got the sword because

1. it was only 5k

2. i am scared of customizing my sundering crellenated blade of fortitude because its good

3. i needed more energy so i could use apply poison and beserker's stance

Also, im just aking how much more extra damage will it save me if I already have 100 AL with sentinals armor and +16 AL with my sheild.

Skuld

Skuld

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Sep 2005

Thousend Tigers Apund Ur Head [Ttgr]

A/

If you're using a +5e mod you're sacrificing a load of damage. If you need energy use gladiator's armour if you need an initial cast above 25 (huh?) or zealous mod for the long run. Sundering sucks!

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

Sundering is really nice, i hate vampiric because i hate the health degeneration, and i always die from health degenerations. Although i have been thinking of buying a victo's blade and switching on and off. Zealous is that same deal. I use that sword generally to poison and lengthen bleeding, although ive beeen thinkiong of switching from a barbed mod to a poison mod. Most likely ill be getting the four types of swords: +5 energy (own now), 15%/-5 energy (own now, favorite PvP weapon), a 15^50 probably will own form victo's blade, and a 15/-10 armor since i own sentinal's armor and armor has diminishing effects.

I actually don't see the difference in damage, i have +20%/+5 energy, and I used to have a +15%/-5 energy without customizing. This all changed because I added aply poison. See "Need help with build" thread to see why.

warriorsmiley

warriorsmiley

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Vandal Hearts [VH]

W/

No warrior should ever have a +5 energy weapon period. If your running a high energy build like you are (which really isnt even a good build to begin with) use a zealous sword with a damage mod and get glads armor so you can have up to 27 armor. A zealous mod with the stance will net you more energy then you will naturally regen. Also do as the other person said and dump the sundering mod on your sword and get a more useful one like vamp 3/1 which will out damage your sundering mod hands down.

Reason i said using your apply poison is a bad build is because that is wasting a slot in which you can take a more useful skill maybe another attack skill or a defensive skill. Like the other person said if your trying to cast something that is gonna waste 25 energy you really have to rethink your build.

Thorin Monk

Thorin Monk

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Jan 2006

UMBC

Mo/N

1. Sundering Sucks
2. If you are getting hit by physical and elemental damage mostly, go with defense, it will reduce the amount you take, fortitude may look nice, but it doesn't help with damage negation, it's other practical use is for countering degen and armor ignoring i.e. holy, shadow, and a couple other things. Personally I use defense 99.9% of the time.

kazjun

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Aug 2006

HoVa

W/N

You could just use it for a running setup. Use the fort and the +5 energy and you can just run through. Shouldn't really take much serious damage (unless you get slowed, KDed or caught on something) so the defense isn't much help.

I wouldn't use the weap for damage though, unless your main damage is something like aftershock or something high energy. In which case go with the zealous as people have suggested, or even use warriors endurance. +4 energy per hit.

If you like poison, I'd suggest go W/N and use virulance, cheap cast and a ton of other conditions and degen on top. Won't even need too much investment in it, just recast on them when their monks fix them.

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

Look...sundering and fortitude cost me losts of $$$$$ which took me over two months to make since i don't play for over 2 hours, and most likely now 4 hours tops a week.

You guys can't just flame me because i choose sundering!!! if i replace it that means BOOM 60k lost...

I will kick out apply poison, but just remember all i did was put more leniance to other enemies that don't have flesh those are usaully the undead that use hexes and stuff they always group up on me and cream me!!!! Thats why i use a fortitude mod....most warriors just strap on a glads armor and get the +8 energy boost while i choose to strap on a sentinals and have high AL... ...that way i kick out the defense mod. plus i have my sheild. so 116 AL level is a lot already...and i know that when you have so much AL you tend to have diminishing effects.

I am currently trying to buy a victo's blade...for the information you have given me, this blade will only be a cheap 5k..so its pretty nice....i just hate the other effect of only when its above 50 health and esp. hurt with the health degeneration. but usually when i die its because i get mobbed anyways.

Gigashadow

Gigashadow

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Aug 2005

Bellevue, WA

W/

Sundering is terrible. Get vampiric or zealous instead (I use zealous on my W/R to keep tiger's fury up).

Either defense or fortitude work, I have one of each. If you are going for tons of armor for PvE (using sentinels etc.), you can make it even better with a Defense mod on your weapon. +5ar is about an 8% damage reduction (although it doesn't work vs attack skill bonus damage). Also grab a shield that helps with further armor reduction. If you're playing a W/R with Tiger's Fury, you will almost always be in a stance, so you can use "-2 physical damage received while in a stance". Alternatively, grab a shield with a mod of "+10 vs [either slashing or blunt]".

When you are reducing your damage by such a large percentage, it makes the warrior rune of superior absorption more useful, as that is subtracted from what is left after armor is taken into account. It becomes increasingly better the less damage you were already taking.

Tingi

Tingi

Wilds Pathfinder

Join Date: Dec 2005

Mo/

yep, In PvE, I'm ALWAYS w/r with tigers furry and a zealous weapon. Sundering is a bad mod end of.

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

ARRRGGGGGG!!!!!! the next person to tell me to junk sundering ,why don't YOU give me 60k...then ill change it.

I think in addition to +5 energy sword, +15%/-5 with sundering and fortitude, +15%^50 victo's blade, i probably get another +15%/-5 energy and put on a defense mod and a furious mod

Gigashadow

Gigashadow

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Aug 2005

Bellevue, WA

W/

Furious is not good either.

You really want:

- Vampiric
- Zealous
- Elemental (preferably Ebon or Cold if you are going to PvP at all) for fighting physically resistant targets

Skuld

Skuld

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Sep 2005

Thousend Tigers Apund Ur Head [Ttgr]

A/

Just because you bought it for 60k doesn't mean it's good and you have to endorse it :|

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

Im not endorsing, i am saying that i don't want you to keep flaming me for using a sundering mod.... i just don't see how vampiric is so great.... all mods are equal in power ( in some way) and serve their purpose or else why would anyone make it anymore. sundering i believe is the best all purpose mod, while vampiric is the best for damage. i prefer a mod that i can use for everything.

I am an adrenaline user mainly, i don't see a purpose of elemental damages, other than that there will no longer be a physical dmage, which kills the ppl with 80 AL + 20 against physical attacks

I actually don't see the fuss about tiger's fury, i typed it in on guildwiki and it just increases attack speed by 33% for 10 seconds and disables other skills for 5 seconds, i can get that with beserker's stance and it has an effect of increasing adrenaline. I use my W/R for cool skills like pets and troll ungent.

Gigashadow

Gigashadow

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Aug 2005

Bellevue, WA

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante the Warlord
all mods are equal in power ( in some way) and serve their purpose or else why would anyone make it anymore.
No they aren't. Do you think all skills are equal in power too? (or else why would they have so many?)

Quote: Originally Posted by Dante the Warlord I am an adrenaline user mainly, i don't see a purpose of elemental damages, other than that there will no longer be a physical dmage, which kills the ppl with 80 AL + 20 against physical attacks Elemental damage has nothing to do with adrenaline. You still gain adrenaline from damage dealt with an elemental weapon.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante the Warlord
I actually don't see the fuss about tiger's fury, i typed it in on guildwiki and it just increases attack speed by 33% for 10 seconds and disables other skills for 5 seconds, i can get that with beserker's stance and it has an effect of increasing adrenaline. I use my W/R for cool skills like pets and troll ungent. Berserker stance has a 30s reset and ends if you use a skill. Tiger's Fury has a 10s reset, doesn't end if you use a skill, and can easily be kept up 9 seconds out of every 10 if you use a zealous weapon.

Troll unguent and pets are absolutely terrible choices on a PvE warrior.

Franco

Franco

Banned

Join Date: Jul 2006

England

VoB

Me/

Quote:
I use my W/R for cool skills like pets and troll ungent. ^^ Enough said there.

Close thread, no point argueing lol.

This guy wont understand that a Zealous mod can keep his energy up ALL the time even if he spammed apply poison, troll ungent and "comfort animal" (lmao), Vampiric mod is a better then sundering and the -1 degen that kills you.... You're meant to switch weapon so you dont have -1 all the time.

What they said about Ebon and Cold, its not because its elemental , the guy mentioned this kind of damage for PvP warriors which have no armor against elemental, so it would be better then sundering.

Now don't need to get exalted, no one is flaming you for using sundering, we just saying that Zealous or Vampiric is better, Oh and its not our fault you spended 60k on a sundering mod .

Wouldnt a 20/19 do ?

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

Geez dude i already pointed out i knew all that about elemental damage as in my previous stated comment., i might have got u guys confused because i was in a rush and it seemed like a whole other comment.

As for tigers stance...not bad, but id still take beserker's stance, its much better with its better energy req. and additional adrenaline... in 10 seconds i already have all my adrenaline needed. at least most of them.and even if it gets stoped, i use whatever skils i have anyway, i.e. quivering blade and sever artery, which are definately my main killers.

i use troll ungent to regain health. and i change around with bonetti's defense and defensive stance to help me a little more.

I use sundering because its easy to use. vapiric makes me just un easy....but ill still get it... why do you guys keep saying 'sundering sucks" when i clearly am buying a victo's blade....geez...some of you guys are so ignorant.

FYI...saying SUNDERING SUCKS is considered flaming.

and yes all skills are created equal...otherwise everyone would have only one bar of skills...and we wouldn't have builds to use those skills to their full potential...there are no bad skills, just people stupi enough not to see that they have potential using the right skills.

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

Geez dude i already pointed out i knew all that about elemental damage as in my previous stated comment., i might have got u guys confused because i was in a rush and it seemed like a whole other comment.

As for tigers stance...not bad, but id still take beserker's stance, its much better with its better energy req. and additional adrenaline... in 10 seconds i already have all my adrenaline needed. at least most of them.and even if it gets stoped, i use whatever skils i have anyway, i.e. quivering blade and sever artery, which are definately my main killers.

i use troll ungent to regain health. and i change around with bonetti's defense and defensive stance to help me a little more.

I use sundering because its easy to use...why should i concentrate on the game so much and keep looking at three places at once ( health, enemy bar, incoming people)...I just like laying back and kicking everyone around with my cool weapon sets.

FYI...saying SUNDERING SUCKS is considered flaming.

and yes all skills are created equal...otherwise everyone would have only one bar of skills...and we wouldn't have builds to use those skills to their full potential...there are no bad skills, just people stupi enough not to see that they have potential using the right skills.

Silver_Fang

Lion's Arch Merchant

Join Date: Aug 2006

Manchester UK

Rt/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante the Warlord
Geez dude i already pointed out i knew all that about elemental damage as in my previous stated comment., i might have got u guys confused because i was in a rush and it seemed like a whole other comment.

As for tigers stance...not bad, but id still take beserker's stance, its much better with its better energy req. and additional adrenaline... in 10 seconds i already have all my adrenaline needed. at least most of them.and even if it gets stoped, i use whatever skils i have anyway, i.e. quivering blade and sever artery, which are definately my main killers.

i use troll ungent to regain health. and i change around with bonetti's defense and defensive stance to help me a little more.

I use sundering because its easy to use...why should i concentrate on the game so much and keep looking at three places at once ( health, enemy bar, incoming people)...I just like laying back and kicking everyone around with my cool weapon sets.

FYI...saying SUNDERING SUCKS is considered flaming.

and yes all skills are created equal...otherwise everyone would have only one bar of skills...and we wouldn't have builds to use those skills to their full potential...there are no bad skills, just people stupi enough not to see that they have potential using the right skills. No, saying Sundering suck isnt flaming, saying you suck is flaming, we are just pointing out the fact that sundering is useless, nothing more, nothing less.

not all skill are equal. Are you saying Preservation is as good as ritual lord?

winkgood

winkgood

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Feb 2006

GoL

R/

First off, I have very few weapons in my collection which use sundering. However, its not the utterly useless mod that you people make it out to be. All I see in this thread are a bunch of flamers who know very little about the game but they heard from others that "sundering sucks" so they decided to jump on the bandwagon.

Jeez people, give the guy a break. Not everyone can afford a different weapon and mod setup for every situation. In general, sundering is the safest way to go as there are no drawbacks to it and it is always useful. Vampiric requires the wielder to switch weapons to another for effectiveness. Furious requires you to use adreneline skills to be useful. Elemental assumes you aren't fighting against a ranger or npc with resistance to that element. Zealous is nice but if you aren't hitting constantly, then you are suffering from a considerable energy disadvantage.

For everyone's info, sundering actually will outdamage vampiric when using an adreneline based axe warrior. I would find the link to the thread on this but gwonline is having issues, atm. A sword warrior's damage is slighly lower with sundering than vampiric but is definitely not the huge different that you would think based on everyone's cries that "sundering sucks."

In summary, if all you want to do is stand on your soapbox and tell everyone how much sundering sucks, then please do the rest of us a favor and shut your yapper.

Evilsod

Evilsod

Banned

Join Date: Mar 2006

England

Lievs Death Squad [LDS]

Quote:
First off, I have very few weapons in my collection which use sundering. However, its not the utterly useless mod that you people make it out to be. All I see in this thread are a bunch of flamers who know very little about the game but they heard from others that "sundering sucks" so they decided to jump on the bandwagon.
Its quite likely 3/4 of the people who have said 'Sundering sucks' (of which i will be one soon) have seen the numbers crunchers proof that it sucks. So yeah, sundering S*U*C*K*S

Quote:
Jeez people, give the guy a break. Not everyone can afford a different weapon and mod setup for every situation. In general, sundering is the safest way to go as there are no drawbacks to it and it is always useful. Vampiric requires the wielder to switch weapons to another for effectiveness. Furious requires you to use adreneline skills to be useful. Elemental assumes you aren't fighting against a ranger or npc with resistance to that element. Zealous is nice but if you aren't hitting constantly, then you are suffering from a considerable energy disadvantage. If he can't afford a different mod for every situation... why is he using a Crenallated Sword? A rare (max damage) skin. Myself i have a 15^50 req8 10/10 +30 Chaos Axe, why? I thought sundering was the bomb when i modded it. However its uncustomised and i have 'never' used it. Zealous is a hindrence if you arent hitting, so is vampiric... so why not switch weapons when you aren't hitting? Things don't kite in PvE and if your playing with the right team in PvP, they can't in some cases there either. Furious however is utter crap imo. There is a drawback to sundering, there are 2 infact. 1 They cost a fortune for little effect. There effect is a CHANCE.

If i could be bothered to mod my own weapons isntead of using greens i'd have the majority with defensive mods. Armour matters from the first time you get hit. Health matters when the little red bar gets closer to 0. Even if the damage is armour ignoring/degen it makes no difference to you till you get to 1.

Shadowfox1125

Shadowfox1125

Forge Runner

Join Date: Mar 2005

PST

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dante the Warlord
i use troll ungent to regain health. and i change around with bonetti's defense and defensive stance to help me a little more. I'll help you with what you said above and stay out of the Sword mod argument (I'm against Sundering. Deal with it.)

Ditch the Troll Ungent.. and all your points in Wilderness - ask yourself, how much does the Troll Ungent actually heal you? And then ask yourself how much Healing Signet would do if you put the points you took out of Wilderness and added them to Tactics? Plus, it'll make your Bonetti and Defensive Stance more effective.

Jeez.. so how many different attributes do you invest in?
I'll take a guess:
Sword, Strength, Tactics, Wilderness, and Beast Mastery?
That's five different attributes.. you're most likely spread so thin that you don't do much damage nor heal yourself efficiently.

There are some good warrior guides here in this forum and a great warrior guide at guildwiki (they might be the same, I'm not sure). Look at those for help.

Good luck.

Gigashadow

Gigashadow

Jungle Guide

Join Date: Aug 2005

Bellevue, WA

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkgood
For everyone's info, sundering actually will outdamage vampiric when using an adreneline based axe warrior. I would find the link to the thread on this but gwonline is having issues, atm. A sword warrior's damage is slighly lower with sundering than vampiric but is definitely not the huge different that you would think based on everyone's cries that "sundering sucks."
Wrong, it is a large difference, and whether the warrior is adrenaline based or not has no relevance whatsoever. Vampiric is almost twice as good. For the numbers see here here

And "it's too expensive/hard to have two weapons" is a terrible/lazy excuse. Just get a generic collector weapon and buy one of the bazillion cheap vampiric mods being sold in Lion's Arch (they're cheap because dumb people bid up those 20/20 sundering mods instead). ...unless you care more about looks than making yourself useful.

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkgood
In summary, if all you want to do is stand on your soapbox and tell everyone how much sundering sucks, then please do the rest of us a favor and shut your yapper. How about, if all you want to do is post things that are known to be clearly WRONG, you do everyone here a favor and shut yours?

warriorsmiley

warriorsmiley

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Vandal Hearts [VH]

W/

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkgood
Jeez people, give the guy a break. Not everyone can afford a different weapon and mod setup for every situation. In general, sundering is the safest way to go as there are no drawbacks to it and it is always useful. Vampiric requires the wielder to switch weapons to another for effectiveness. Furious requires you to use adreneline skills to be useful. Elemental assumes you aren't fighting against a ranger or npc with resistance to that element. Zealous is nice but if you aren't hitting constantly, then you are suffering from a considerable energy disadvantage. Ya sundering sucks end of story there are many threads that already proved it. However it isnt totally useless as i use it as a switch off weapon when im not doing anything so i dont suffer health or energy degen.

You say give the guy a break that he cant afford the other mods. 20/20 sundering mod goes for about 45-55k. I got my vamp, zealous, elemental, and 20/19 mods for 20k all together. Thats half the price you would pay for a perfect sundering mod and as you can see i got more out of it then you did and i also picked up a 20/19 mod which is just as good. Like i said before if your going energy heavy zealous mod is the best no if ands or buts about it, and its about 5-8k(alot cheaper then sundering). If your not smart enough to realize to change weapons when you arent attacking so you have no negative affects then you need some sort help.

Franco

Franco

Banned

Join Date: Jul 2006

England

VoB

Me/

Quote:
And "it's too expensive/hard to have two weapons" is a terrible/lazy excuse. Just get a generic collector weapon and buy one of the bazillion cheap vampiric mods being sold in Lion's Arch (they're cheap because dumb people bid up those 20/20 sundering mods instead). ...unless you care more about looks than making yourself useful. Well said, That was my point, why you defending him saying he cant afford a vampiric mod ?

Oh so he can afford a perfect sundering mod and a Crenellated sword but he cant afford a vamp mod which is like 8k ?

Jeremy Untouchable

Jeremy Untouchable

Wow Stole my freetime

Join Date: Mar 2006

Arkansas

None

W/E

sundering is fine for a all purpose sword, maybe in a riptoes (pun intended) build. And furious wasnt ment for warriors, its for us 55's to charge up Bonettis sundering is kinda, for me anyway,the mod i leave on untill i find something else, Allso, i allmost allways use a +5 energy weapon on my warrior, Whos smarter? me 32 energy customized totem axe, or the guy with a sword or axe with a 15>50 damage mod hes scared to customize? I gain 5 energy, AND 5% damage....................totem axe also has 20/20 sundering........ZOMG...........out

Skuld

Skuld

Furnace Stoker

Join Date: Sep 2005

Thousend Tigers Apund Ur Head [Ttgr]

A/

How can you compare a 20% customised +5e to an uncustomised 15%..

Totem is a caster axe, don't embarass yourself.

warriorsmiley

warriorsmiley

Krytan Explorer

Join Date: Oct 2005

Vandal Hearts [VH]

W/

Monk/Warriors arent real warriors.

winkgood

winkgood

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Feb 2006

GoL

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Evilsod
Its quite likely 3/4 of the people who have said 'Sundering sucks' (of which i will be one soon) have seen the numbers crunchers proof that it sucks. So yeah, sundering S*U*C*K*S
Quote: Originally Posted by Gigashadow Wrong, it is a large difference, and whether the warrior is adrenaline based or not has no relevance whatsoever. Vampiric is almost twice as good. http://forums.gwonline.net/showthrea...ight=sundering

In most cases, vampiric will have SLIGHTLY higher DPS than sundering. Check out the adreneline axe tests, though. Does lower DPS mean that sundering "sucks"? Not by any means. What happens when you have blind or blurred vision on? Or your target is using distortion or another evasion stance. Then your vampiric becomes a liability. Before coming out with absolute statements, do a little research first.

Quote: Originally Posted by Evilsod
If he can't afford a different mod for every situation... why is he using a Crenallated Sword? A rare (max damage) skin. Myself i have a 15^50 req8 10/10 +30 Chaos Axe, why? I thought sundering was the bomb when i modded it. However its uncustomised and i have 'never' used it. Zealous is a hindrence if you arent hitting, so is vampiric... so why not switch weapons when you aren't hitting? Things don't kite in PvE and if your playing with the right team in PvP, they can't in some cases there either. Furious however is utter crap imo. There is a drawback to sundering, there are 2 infact. 1 They cost a fortune for little effect. There effect is a CHANCE. So effects being "a chance" makes them utter crap? I guess the pre-nerf rockmolder sucked too, eh? Or 20/20's on staffs and offhands? Better rethink your philosophy because I'd wager most would disagree with it. Apparently you don't have a whole lot of pvp experience where adreneline spikes are the makers and breakers of kills in most gvg builds. Furious can accelerate the frequency of adreneline spikes like you wouldn't believe.

Sundering costs a fotune if you are going for a perfect 20/20 one. 20/19 is far cheaper. The same goes for any expensive mod. Just get something slightly less than perfect.

Quote:
If i could be bothered to mod my own weapons isntead of using greens i'd have the majority with defensive mods. Armour matters from the first time you get hit. Health matters when the little red bar gets closer to 0. Even if the damage is armour ignoring/degen it makes no difference to you till you get to 1. In PVP Fortitude > Defense in almost all situations. There is way too much armor ignoring damage and degen to make defense a viable mod. Every time you are healed to full health, you are seeing the benefits of fortitude as you are that much further from a spike. If GvG strategy consisted of damage over time with only physical and elemental damage, then I could agree with you. Unfortunately, this is not the case.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gigashadow
And "it's too expensive/hard to have two weapons" is a terrible/lazy excuse. Just get a generic collector weapon and buy one of the bazillion cheap vampiric mods being sold in Lion's Arch (they're cheap because dumb people bid up those 20/20 sundering mods instead). ...unless you care more about looks than making yourself useful. Um, no. Two things determine price. Supply and demand. True, the price of 20/20 sundering mods is inflated because everyone seems to think if they sell perfect req8 15^50 weapons with sundering on them, that they will somehow profit more. An even bigger factor though is the rarity of 20/20 sundering mods. Compare the number of perfect vampiric mods you've found in the game with the number of 20/20 sundering mods. Personally, I've found tons of vamp mods and maybe a couple perfect sundering mods (I think both were unsuccessful salvages).

Franco

Franco

Banned

Join Date: Jul 2006

England

VoB

Me/

The Point here is. If he wants energy for his build, Zealous ftw.

But this is totally off topic.

Fortitude mod is better if you are suffering hexes and armor ignoring damage.

Defense mod is better if you are just tanking meele and other mob like that.

So in my opinion, if you are going to a place of hexes, conditions etc, like PvP areas > Forittude

PvE which is probably where you are working , go Defense.

Jetdoc

Jetdoc

Hell's Protector

Join Date: Jul 2005

The Eyes of Texas [BEVO]

D/A

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkgood
Does lower DPS mean that sundering "sucks"? Not by any means. What happens when you have blind or blurred vision on? Or your target is using distortion or another evasion stance. Then your vampiric becomes a liability. So you're basing whether one modifier is better than another assuming that you can't attack?

That's one of the worst arguments for justifying a weapon modifier that I've seen. You can make an argument that sundering is better for the potential of "spike" damage (i.e. getting lucky and hitting that 20% chance 2-3 times in a chain), but arguing that "lower DPS" doesn't mean it's a worse modifier is an oxymoron.

The purpose of weapons is to DAMAGE. And if one modifier is proven to give you a higher Damage Per Second than another modifier, it is simply better.

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

Yea i totaly agree with winkgood and jeremy (and shadowfox, thanx for the advice...but can i ask wht use full wilderness are there?). Anyways, i am NOT rich, crellenated may be an expensive skin, but i got a lot of money from gifts and loans i got from my brother and i am still paying the loans back. i spend some time trying to make some good $$$.

If you disagree, then just don't post it like winkgood says and stop hating, maybe i do less damage, but then again, a few points damage won't matter and plus i can definately see winkgood's point on no drawbacks...

i can definately see how vampiric has good benifits, but all that number crunching always says "overall damage" few of you actually look into the vitallity... again, i think vampiric is ok...but i like the safetyness and easiness of sundering makes me feel that sundering is the better choice for me.

And for all you flamers saying "SUNDERING SUCKS". whats the point, what you want everyone to think like you do, act like you do? Have no opinions??? Then vampiric will be like 60k and then all of you will be like "VAMPIRIC SUCKS" and then have evryone flame you??? Come on, you guys are acting like whiny little kids who complain about every little thing... don't you guys believe in HAVING FUN anymore????? Its all about being on edge, paying so close attention to everything in a cool game and always think that your better then people who disagree?

Dante the Warlord

Desert Nomad

Join Date: Jul 2006

W/R

Quote:
Originally Posted by Franco
The Point here is. If he wants energy for his build, Zealous ftw.

But this is totally off topic.

Fortitude mod is better if you are suffering hexes and armor ignoring damage.

Defense mod is better if you are just tanking meele and other mob like that.

So in my opinion, if you are going to a place of hexes, conditions etc, like PvP areas > Forittude

PvE which is probably where you are working , go Defense. thanx i got so angry that people think they are better than me that i forgot what i was originally asking anyways.. thanx i like defense

winkgood

winkgood

Frost Gate Guardian

Join Date: Feb 2006

GoL

R/

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gigashadow
Those calculations are flawed, as they use Wild Blow, which is guaranteed to crit. This makes sundering appear better than it actually is on those tests. It inflates axes' sundering numbers even further, as axes have a higher damage range, and a crit is ~141% of the maximum damage of a weapon. Think of how many spikes in pvp are done as the target is fleeing. All hits to a fleeing target will result in a critical hit. So in testing, a high number of critical hits should be included. Also, the reason the op used wild blow was to get a consistent amount of damage. Other tests are by far more flawed as the damage done varies with each hit.

Jetdoc

Jetdoc

Hell's Protector

Join Date: Jul 2005

The Eyes of Texas [BEVO]

D/A

Dante, these posts are absolutely not about flaming. It's to simply state that people use sundering because it sounds flashy - "I get to do 20% armor penetration - that's SWEET!!!!"

"Vampiric sounds kind of okay, but man, I hate having ANY negatives to my weapon."

That's the type of attitude that we are trying to dispel here - Vampiric's health degeneration is well worth the benefit you get from utilizing it. Number crunching aside, it's simply been proven to be much more effective than vampiric. winkgood, unfortunately, is spreading downright inaccurate information. That's not flaming - it's the simple truth, and there is very little debate about it.

Regarding why Sundering is so much more expensive than Vampiric, it was summarized very well by another poster - there are only three variations of vampiric on swords/axes - 3/1, 2/1 and 1/1, and most of the time the 3/1 drops. As such, almost every vampiric mod available out there is "perfect" - which is why it is so cheap to get a vampiric (normally available for 3-5K).

Sundering drops anywhere from a 10% chance to a 20% chance, so it is much more rare to get a 20% chance modifier. Because it is so rare and people have misconceptions about its usefulness, that is why it is so expensive.

Again, these posts are not to put you on the defensive (pun intended). They are simply to explain why sundering is an inferior choice to vampiric in almost every way. That being said, you can definitely have fun with your weapon and, as long as you enjoy it, that's what really counts.

Jetdoc

Jetdoc

Hell's Protector

Join Date: Jul 2005

The Eyes of Texas [BEVO]

D/A

Quote:
Originally Posted by winkgood
All hits to a fleeing target will result in a critical hit. Also, the reason the op used wild blow was to get a consistent amount of damage. Unless you are an A/W, basing your choice of a weapon modifier on the highly conditional chance that you'll score a critical hit is a poor criteria, unless you use sundering as a switch-off weapon when chasing down a PvP opponent.

I don't believe the OP was planning on using his sword solely for chasing down PvP opponents, so I'm not sure how your argument helps his consideration.

Franco

Franco

Banned

Join Date: Jul 2006

England

VoB

Me/

hehe No problem dude.

I personaly use Zealous and defense mod ,because zealous keeps my energy up ALL the time ^_^.

But if you bought a 20/20 mod for sword just keep it like tht if u like it, its good to show off hehe lol

Yanman.be

Yanman.be

Banned

Join Date: Dec 2005

Belgium

[ROSE]

A/

I love this thread.

Health = PvP, Defense = PvE


So go with defense, because I don't think you'll ever be good at PvP if you keep that attitude.