Quote:
|
Originally Posted by freekedoutfish
Massively Mulitplayer Online Game. How is it not an MMO?
|
/signed for account-wide only
Make Wisdom and Treasure Hunter titles account based
Ash Ravenscar
/signed for account-wide only
Blazeman
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scorn
Sweet tooth= best title in teh wurld
|
ManiSan
Much titles should be account based. Every maxed title should be maxed for every char.
Yeah, all players dont want to stick to one char, including me, making the title system so unfait ive already gave up since the beginning. I like to understand game mechanics, truely understand how each class works, and, as a result, wont get any maxed title (maybe a LB or Sunspear...).
We are human players, using an account, why players that use only one char should get rewards, and not us, the vaste majority ?
Some said that it would be unfair for those that have a nice amount of chest opened yet. Not at all.
/signed
and /signed again for sharing KoabD achievements
Yeah, all players dont want to stick to one char, including me, making the title system so unfait ive already gave up since the beginning. I like to understand game mechanics, truely understand how each class works, and, as a result, wont get any maxed title (maybe a LB or Sunspear...).
We are human players, using an account, why players that use only one char should get rewards, and not us, the vaste majority ?
Some said that it would be unfair for those that have a nice amount of chest opened yet. Not at all.
/signed
and /signed again for sharing KoabD achievements
MithranArkanere
I'm not for the chest-opening, but I'm absolutely for the Wisdom title.
It doen't really matterwho identify the item.
Either they make it so the title increases when you PICK the item, or make it account wide.
It doen't really matterwho identify the item.
Either they make it so the title increases when you PICK the item, or make it account wide.
firefox74
Make the titles account based it would be the best thing ever !
I have 5000 chest open with my warrior but now im going for maxed out tiltes with my necro and it sucks that I have to start all over again just because I have all rdy spent many many hours on Treasure huunter and they are just gone now....
I have 5000 chest open with my warrior but now im going for maxed out tiltes with my necro and it sucks that I have to start all over again just because I have all rdy spent many many hours on Treasure huunter and they are just gone now....
Kattar
Look at the post dates before posting please...
The Meth
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Katsumi
Look at the post dates before posting please...
|
/signed
Kattar
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The Meth
Its still relevent.
|
Pleikki
/notsigned We need some titles hard to obtain..
MithranArkanere
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pleikki
/notsigned We need some titles hard to obtain..
|
Artorius.Maximus
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Pleikki
/notsigned We need some titles hard to obtain..
|
All titles, except possibly survivor or LDOA, should be account based. Maybe have some type of flag that doesn't give the benefit (if any) of rep based titles until completing the campaign or something but there is no reason to restrict these to character based. If I can do it on one character I can do it on any, that doesn't mean that I should need to go back out and grind again.
EDIT:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Phoenix Tears
how immensely ironic is it to see a thread from somebody, who is usually against every slightest thing, that makes the game anyhow slightly "easier" and more multi character friendly again, as GW was, before titles got implemented to the game.
yadda yadda yadda combine this then alos with soem little increases of requirements maybe to balance everything and all should be fine, but Guild Wars would become finally agaiun multi character friendly, like it was, before Factions ... and to this state must GW come back ASAP |
Yawgmoth
Both of the titles should be account-based. Absolutely No reason not to make them so!
Making them account-based doesn't make them any easier! Still exactly the same amount of work needs to be done! Exactly the same!
It's just about the convenience, the ability to play any character without the annoying feeling that when you find a chest and want to open it it won't count into the title you work on.
Same with finding and identifying golds, having to move them to the Wisdom char is also an annoyance, just much smaller.
Does any sane person out there go for maxing those titles on another character after doing it on one? That's far too extreme, designing a game mechanic around punishing players that don't play just one character is completely stupid.
Anet shows no love for players that don't stick to just one character, there are waay too many game features designed strictly for those playing just one. Making things like the HoM, KaoBD title track and those 2 titles account based would make it fair for all kinds of players no matter whether they prefer to play one or many chars. It wouldn't make anything easier.
/signed for making both titles account based.
Making them account-based doesn't make them any easier! Still exactly the same amount of work needs to be done! Exactly the same!
It's just about the convenience, the ability to play any character without the annoying feeling that when you find a chest and want to open it it won't count into the title you work on.
Same with finding and identifying golds, having to move them to the Wisdom char is also an annoyance, just much smaller.
Does any sane person out there go for maxing those titles on another character after doing it on one? That's far too extreme, designing a game mechanic around punishing players that don't play just one character is completely stupid.
Anet shows no love for players that don't stick to just one character, there are waay too many game features designed strictly for those playing just one. Making things like the HoM, KaoBD title track and those 2 titles account based would make it fair for all kinds of players no matter whether they prefer to play one or many chars. It wouldn't make anything easier.
/signed for making both titles account based.
cruzer
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sophitia Leafblade
/signed for making them account wide,
/unsigned for increasing the requirements. |
Phoenix Tears
how immensely ironic is it to see a thread from somebody, who is usually against every slightest thing, that makes the game anyhow slightly "easier" and more multi character friendly again, as GW was, before titles got implemented to the game.
ROFLMAO..but anyhow ..
signed naturally for those both titles to become finally account based, when not every ALL titles, with certain requirements to show them with all characters, like
- reach level 20
- play through the campaigns fitting to the titles like cartographer, guardian, vanguisher, skill hunter
* means, make alll those titles with your title hunter chara, then reach with a non main char level 20 and play through the campaign, for example now Tyria and the Non title hunter chara, will be able to show all the maxed titles of the title hunter character of tyria...
you hunted with the title hunter chara legendary vanguisher ...with your non title hutner character you#ve to play through firts all 3 campaigns to be able to show the title also with it.
combine this then alos with soem little increases of requirements maybe to balance everything and all should be fine, but Guild Wars would become finally agaiun multi character friendly, like it was, before Factions ... and to this state must GW come back ASAP
ROFLMAO..but anyhow ..
signed naturally for those both titles to become finally account based, when not every ALL titles, with certain requirements to show them with all characters, like
- reach level 20
- play through the campaigns fitting to the titles like cartographer, guardian, vanguisher, skill hunter
* means, make alll those titles with your title hunter chara, then reach with a non main char level 20 and play through the campaign, for example now Tyria and the Non title hunter chara, will be able to show all the maxed titles of the title hunter character of tyria...
you hunted with the title hunter chara legendary vanguisher ...with your non title hutner character you#ve to play through firts all 3 campaigns to be able to show the title also with it.
combine this then alos with soem little increases of requirements maybe to balance everything and all should be fine, but Guild Wars would become finally agaiun multi character friendly, like it was, before Factions ... and to this state must GW come back ASAP
Siadena
/signed, fo sho......
arbiter
/sign this idea
Pleikki
Well wisdom can be bought but treasure hunter atleast take some time.
and if it would became account based,
i hope it wouldnt give bonuses for all chars just for 1 char ppl can choose which one..
and if it would became account based,
i hope it wouldnt give bonuses for all chars just for 1 char ppl can choose which one..
Fear Me!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Evilsod
Do you have any idea how long it takes to get these titles as it is? Upping the max is completely out of the question.
They really should've been made account based in the first place... all you do is move all unids onto 1 character atm whenver you find them and you basically have to use 1 character whenever possible if there will be chests around. |
fotovince
/signed !! it's a very good idea.
Konig Des Todes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Artorius.Maximus
All titles, except possibly survivor or LDOA, should be account based. Maybe have some type of flag that doesn't give the benefit (if any) of rep based titles until completing the campaign or something but there is no reason to restrict these to character based. If I can do it on one character I can do it on any, that doesn't mean that I should need to go back out and grind again.
. |
/signed for making these 2 titles account based, don't care if the requirements are increased, as long as it is not too much. Also /signed for adding Drunkard, Sweet Tooth, and Party Animal to that and at least doubling the point requirements for those 3.
You can't see me
I herd yu liked thred nekromansee.
/Signed, I'm always in support of Grind based titles to be account based.
/Signed, I'm always in support of Grind based titles to be account based.
MithranArkanere
All grind titles (those increased point by point regardless of how or where they are acquired) not related to plot should be account based, like all PvP titles.
That includes drunkard, sweet thoos, lucky, unlucky, treasure hunter, wisdom seeker and the like.
The plot related should be easier the more characters max them.
So, of course, I agee with making Wisdom and Treasure Hunter account based.
If it doesn't matter who wins a point between a monk and an assassin in PvP, why should matter if a monk or an assassin opens a chest in PvE, where parties are usually bigger and henchmen may be doing the job for you?
That includes drunkard, sweet thoos, lucky, unlucky, treasure hunter, wisdom seeker and the like.
The plot related should be easier the more characters max them.
So, of course, I agee with making Wisdom and Treasure Hunter account based.
If it doesn't matter who wins a point between a monk and an assassin in PvP, why should matter if a monk or an assassin opens a chest in PvE, where parties are usually bigger and henchmen may be doing the job for you?
Molock
/unsigned
Its the characters itself that is a Treasure Hunter or Seeker of Wisdom, not all the characters of the account. Its the same as Cartographer, not all the characters get it. The requirement is already high enough, and lets say for example you only use one character in PvE, the increased requirement would then be excessive.
Its the characters itself that is a Treasure Hunter or Seeker of Wisdom, not all the characters of the account. Its the same as Cartographer, not all the characters get it. The requirement is already high enough, and lets say for example you only use one character in PvE, the increased requirement would then be excessive.
BlackSephir
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Molock
/unsigned
Its the characters itself that is a Treasure Hunter or Seeker of Wisdom, not all the characters of the account. Its the same as Cartographer, not all the characters get it. The requirement is already high enough, and lets say for example you only use one character in PvE, the increased requirement would then be excessive. |
inchoate
/Signed.
Although it's pointless. There are good ideas and then there are ANet good ideas.
Although it's pointless. There are good ideas and then there are ANet good ideas.
Konig Des Todes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BlackSephir
And is it the character itself that is a King's Hero, Terrifying Gladiator, Lucky and Friend of the Kurzicks?
|
Which is why these 2 titles *and more imo* should be account based.
MirkoTeran
/unsigned yet again...
Monk Gsb
/signed for the effect to be account based but not the title. (it just makes it "easier" for scubs (like the mctigger "family") to gain KoabD on every 1.)
Frost21
/Signed
I love this idea,this way we don't need to stick to one character to get titles.
I love this idea,this way we don't need to stick to one character to get titles.
OS T
/signed
really hope wisdom and treasure would be account wide.
really hope wisdom and treasure would be account wide.
Tenebrae
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Monk Gsb
/signed for the effect to be account based but not the title. (it just makes it "easier" for scubs (like the mctigger "family") to gain KoabD on every 1.)
|
Legendary Shiz
/signed
those are some pretty ridiculous numbers to get the highest rank for both, 10,000 each? That's insane.
those are some pretty ridiculous numbers to get the highest rank for both, 10,000 each? That's insane.
Shayne Hawke
/signed.
Any suggestions on consolidation of points between characters if this goes into effect?
Any suggestions on consolidation of points between characters if this goes into effect?
MagmaRed
I could easily live with the benefits being account based, but the titles being character based. After all, giving another 'easy' option for GWAMM isn't what I was after. It would also allow people to use those keys, and ID those golds on what ever character they are playing if they aren't after the title, just the benefits. Not sure how Anet would be able to code it so 5 characters opening chests works towards account Lockpick retention, but not towards individual title acquisition. The people who want to max the title would still need to swap items between characters though.
zling
/signed for account based
/not signed for higher requirements
/not signed for higher requirements
assassin shaun
/signed to making treasure titles, identfying wepons, drunk, sweet tooth and party titles account based
stretchs
/signed for the grindapalooza titles being account based, yes of course the QQ will commense from those who have obtained it on ind chars, but imo just raise the tiers for the title and combine all chars per accnt to give the title a bit more use.
Eldin
/signed
Honestly, those are the kinds of titles you DON'T want to ever attempt more than once.
Honestly, those are the kinds of titles you DON'T want to ever attempt more than once.
wanmoke
/signed
Even though I just generally sell everything as is, I would like to salvage runes off of armor on any character and not have to fiddle with storage.
Even though I just generally sell everything as is, I would like to salvage runes off of armor on any character and not have to fiddle with storage.
lorazcyk
/signed.
I like playing my Para, my Rit, my Ele, my Assassin and my monk equally. I don't have a primary character and I don't want to have to pick one. It's I who punches keys and clicks mouse buttons to work on titles, not my characters. Imagine being on HA on your rank 0 monk, and no one will take you in their party, when you have a r10 Ranger!
As someone said above "if I have done it once, I can do it again".
This week I realized that I'm going to have to pick only one character to work on titles. I do not look forward to that.
So, /signed.
I like playing my Para, my Rit, my Ele, my Assassin and my monk equally. I don't have a primary character and I don't want to have to pick one. It's I who punches keys and clicks mouse buttons to work on titles, not my characters. Imagine being on HA on your rank 0 monk, and no one will take you in their party, when you have a r10 Ranger!
As someone said above "if I have done it once, I can do it again".
This week I realized that I'm going to have to pick only one character to work on titles. I do not look forward to that.
So, /signed.