Ranger Pet Stable?
Havanah Blast
I'm wondering if rangers would like a place to store all their pets? I've had this idea for awhile, and the Hall of Monuments makes me think it wouldn't be unreasonable to pull off. So, one day my guildy might feel like her black moa, the next she wants to use her new white moa, a little stable or petting zoo for her ranger pets would really make this possible!
legendel
Personally i'd love to be able to switch pets, so if it's votes you're arter,
/vote for it
/vote for it
Doucet
i can /vote agree on that one
Having the ability to have multiple pets would be great. Say if your going to have a parabuffer with you, Anthem of flame etc, bring your Black Bear pet because it activates it for an added bonus. Then switch to another pet when your done again. I like my new Eagle I got, but I would of liked to keep my lv 20 pet as well. And im sure rangers who put in the time/money for a Widow would want to stable it to go get a new GW:EN pet for sure.
Having the ability to have multiple pets would be great. Say if your going to have a parabuffer with you, Anthem of flame etc, bring your Black Bear pet because it activates it for an added bonus. Then switch to another pet when your done again. I like my new Eagle I got, but I would of liked to keep my lv 20 pet as well. And im sure rangers who put in the time/money for a Widow would want to stable it to go get a new GW:EN pet for sure.
Friar Khan
/vote from me
Lycan Nibbler
/vote for
I like my phoenix, but wouldnt mind being able to change without having to lose my original pet.
I like my phoenix, but wouldnt mind being able to change without having to lose my original pet.
Saraphim
/vote from me too.
As much as I'd like a hyena for my ranger, I don't want to lose her white tiger permanently. The ability to stable with the pet tamers (for a small fee) would be great.
As much as I'd like a hyena for my ranger, I don't want to lose her white tiger permanently. The ability to stable with the pet tamers (for a small fee) would be great.
=HT=Ingram
/vote yes...
This was the original Pet kennel concept since before prophecies went gold. just was never implemented... Was asked for again as a Guild hall service back when Factions came out... I do not think we will get it but I'll put a vote for it all the same
good luck...
This was the original Pet kennel concept since before prophecies went gold. just was never implemented... Was asked for again as a Guild hall service back when Factions came out... I do not think we will get it but I'll put a vote for it all the same
good luck...
Cebe
/vote_yes
There are too many nice animals to choose from...I want more...and I feel too much loyalty to my tiger, The Colonel, to replace him...
There are too many nice animals to choose from...I want more...and I feel too much loyalty to my tiger, The Colonel, to replace him...
The Little Viking
I have always agreed that we need a place to keep ranger pets. I dont want to give up my UW spider but would love to have a pheonix. I think we should be able to let them run wild at the guild hall. When we want to swap pets for a change of pace, talk to an NPC and get your wanted pet. Cho has enough of our pets. I want to keep mine, and have a couple extra. Put a limit as to how many we can have (limit 5 say, just as a number). Give us a guild manger please.
Everblight
/vote yes
This is a mechanic from "That Other Game" (WoW) that would be most welcome here, even, as some suggest, a guild hall or Hall of Monuments upgrade. A single stable slot that can be increased with additional gold would be great. I finally managed to train a dire pet, and do not want to get rid of him, even with all the great new pets (caribou ftw!).
This is a mechanic from "That Other Game" (WoW) that would be most welcome here, even, as some suggest, a guild hall or Hall of Monuments upgrade. A single stable slot that can be increased with additional gold would be great. I finally managed to train a dire pet, and do not want to get rid of him, even with all the great new pets (caribou ftw!).
Rhedd
Nobody that's ever played a beastmaster for ten seconds is going to say "no" to this idea.
Sadly, the fact that it has a 100% approval rating doesn't make it any more likely to come true.
But, /yes from me, too, just for the record.
Sadly, the fact that it has a 100% approval rating doesn't make it any more likely to come true.
But, /yes from me, too, just for the record.
MithranArkanere
Even eing able to trade pets with your heroes would be enough.
Mr. Undisclosed
The guild would make a pretty damn cool wild life sanctuary. Shame we couldn't save the pigmy hippos 
/yes
/yes
kielus
/vote yes
of course i love my lil phoenix, but i'd love to have other pets aswell... without charming them again and lvling up from 5 to get the dire one, just to find another lovely pet to get and so on. pretty time consuming, huh?
of course i love my lil phoenix, but i'd love to have other pets aswell... without charming them again and lvling up from 5 to get the dire one, just to find another lovely pet to get and so on. pretty time consuming, huh?
leeky baby
/signed, just incase i want to chnage
trobinson97
/not signed.
I like it the way it is. I've had my black widow Ungoliant on my ranger (main char) for about a year and a half and as much as I want a black wolf, I don't like the idea of having it both ways. I know it's just a game, but you expect pets to be loyal to a degree, the very least you could do is show some yourself. I like change sometimes but in this case I like things the way they are.
I know I know, it really sucks when someone comes in and /not signs something you really really would like.
I like it the way it is. I've had my black widow Ungoliant on my ranger (main char) for about a year and a half and as much as I want a black wolf, I don't like the idea of having it both ways. I know it's just a game, but you expect pets to be loyal to a degree, the very least you could do is show some yourself. I like change sometimes but in this case I like things the way they are.
I know I know, it really sucks when someone comes in and /not signs something you really really would like.
Prowlinger
/signed
We need it desperately!
We need it desperately!
Doucet
If they wanted loyalty etc they would of implemented some sort of display showing your bond with your animal companion, and they would of added more functions for feeding the pet, grooming it etc. Instead, they haven't, making the pet only good for its looks.
Being able to have more than one pet that you can swap freely from your guild hall or HoM would be ideal for anybody who has played beastmaster because of the fact of seeing the same old pet all the time makes playing builds with beastmastery less and less desirable. its always nice to change up your skill bar, why not your pet? but of course, changing your pet to spice up beastmastery means you either have to get a black widow, death level or actual go and level up your pet, which all 3 are a pain. Adding in something buyable(buy per stable slot) that would store pets for you would help make beastmastery rangers more enjoyable to play.
Im thinking if anything, 5 pets would be too much to ask for, but 2-3 extra slots to hold a maximum of 3 pets would certainly be nice
Being able to have more than one pet that you can swap freely from your guild hall or HoM would be ideal for anybody who has played beastmaster because of the fact of seeing the same old pet all the time makes playing builds with beastmastery less and less desirable. its always nice to change up your skill bar, why not your pet? but of course, changing your pet to spice up beastmastery means you either have to get a black widow, death level or actual go and level up your pet, which all 3 are a pain. Adding in something buyable(buy per stable slot) that would store pets for you would help make beastmastery rangers more enjoyable to play.
Im thinking if anything, 5 pets would be too much to ask for, but 2-3 extra slots to hold a maximum of 3 pets would certainly be nice
Phoenix Tears
signet, we need the possibility to have every pet, that we tamed ...
i don#t understand, why anet simple makes not out of the tame skill a stupid signet skill, like the signet of capturing.
Then its the Signet of Beast Mastery.
Ever when u tame then a different pet with such a signet, the signet changes to a Skill that includes the tamed pet and the signet disapears for it and the player has then to buy a new signet at the npc, like buying a new signet of capturing.
This way, every different pet becomes then a different "Skill" and with this pay it would be possible finally in an easy way to make out of beast masters real beast masters, which could run around with 3 different pets.
Example:
I want catch following 3 pets (spoiler includes new gw:en ones)
- Mountain Eagle
- Black Wolve
- White Wolve
So i buy me form the npc 3 Signets of Beast Mastery
My Build: 7x Skill X + Signet of Beast Mastery.
I find now my Mountain Eagle and catch it... the Signet changes now into the Skill "Moutain Eagle-Fellow"
Next i catch Black Wolve, signet changes into "Black Wolve-Fellow" and last but not least "White Wolve-Fellow"
Now i want to make my beast master build with 3 pets following at my side:
Build:
5x Skill X, Mountain Eagle-Fellow, Black Wolve-Fellow, White Wolve-Fellow.
SO every pet i want to have with me is then like the old tame skill, u must have the skill then with u to have the pet with u, but this improvement of the tame skill enables having every pet, having the possibility to exchange pets and having the possibility to have more then only 1 pet at ur side, because a beast master is NO beast master with ONLY 1 pet, thats imo only like a dompteuer, but no beast master, beast master control more then 1 pet at once.
thats by far the best possible solution for everything and when beast master becomes then to powerful then change max lvl of pets to 15 ...
come on, a MM necro can have 10 minions, the elitze minion can reach lvl 25!!! while the normal onces can reach up to lvl 16-18 or so ..
a very good MM can keep his minions very long alive even with the life degeneration what should be the only reason, why MM is inot imbalanced -.-
But when we say, ranger should get 3 pets, this is direct IMBA !!! ya sure, with this way of thinking, then would be ritu's ghost massively be underpowered, because they can reach only lvl 9 or so, but in avererage only lvl 7, they can't move, have no defense and mostly die all with 1 hit from a strong melee class PLUS that ritualists can have only EVER 1 of the same ghosts on field at the time.
So 2 ritualists with same ghosts = crap, wont work, but for MM necro its again totally regardless, there can exists hundres of the same minions on field, more then 1 flesh golem on field ect ...
to come to a point, ranger pets and ritu ghosts need to be buffed for balance compared to mm necs minions.
ranger should get more then 1 pet (maybe then with only max lvl 15)
ranger/ritualist ghosts need higher levels, so that they don't die all mostly with 1 hit of a melee chara, like a derwish or a hammer warrioer. say instad of lvl 7 in average, make the average lvl 12
ghosts should be invulnerable versus physical hits. Why ?
because u cant simple hit things, that have NO materia.
only mage classes should be able to attack rangers/ritualists ghosts or players with have on their weapons an elemental enchantment
i don#t understand, why anet simple makes not out of the tame skill a stupid signet skill, like the signet of capturing.
Then its the Signet of Beast Mastery.
Ever when u tame then a different pet with such a signet, the signet changes to a Skill that includes the tamed pet and the signet disapears for it and the player has then to buy a new signet at the npc, like buying a new signet of capturing.
This way, every different pet becomes then a different "Skill" and with this pay it would be possible finally in an easy way to make out of beast masters real beast masters, which could run around with 3 different pets.
Example:
I want catch following 3 pets (spoiler includes new gw:en ones)
- Mountain Eagle
- Black Wolve
- White Wolve
So i buy me form the npc 3 Signets of Beast Mastery
My Build: 7x Skill X + Signet of Beast Mastery.
I find now my Mountain Eagle and catch it... the Signet changes now into the Skill "Moutain Eagle-Fellow"
Next i catch Black Wolve, signet changes into "Black Wolve-Fellow" and last but not least "White Wolve-Fellow"
Now i want to make my beast master build with 3 pets following at my side:
Build:
5x Skill X, Mountain Eagle-Fellow, Black Wolve-Fellow, White Wolve-Fellow.
SO every pet i want to have with me is then like the old tame skill, u must have the skill then with u to have the pet with u, but this improvement of the tame skill enables having every pet, having the possibility to exchange pets and having the possibility to have more then only 1 pet at ur side, because a beast master is NO beast master with ONLY 1 pet, thats imo only like a dompteuer, but no beast master, beast master control more then 1 pet at once.
thats by far the best possible solution for everything and when beast master becomes then to powerful then change max lvl of pets to 15 ...
come on, a MM necro can have 10 minions, the elitze minion can reach lvl 25!!! while the normal onces can reach up to lvl 16-18 or so ..
a very good MM can keep his minions very long alive even with the life degeneration what should be the only reason, why MM is inot imbalanced -.-
But when we say, ranger should get 3 pets, this is direct IMBA !!! ya sure, with this way of thinking, then would be ritu's ghost massively be underpowered, because they can reach only lvl 9 or so, but in avererage only lvl 7, they can't move, have no defense and mostly die all with 1 hit from a strong melee class PLUS that ritualists can have only EVER 1 of the same ghosts on field at the time.
So 2 ritualists with same ghosts = crap, wont work, but for MM necro its again totally regardless, there can exists hundres of the same minions on field, more then 1 flesh golem on field ect ...
to come to a point, ranger pets and ritu ghosts need to be buffed for balance compared to mm necs minions.
ranger should get more then 1 pet (maybe then with only max lvl 15)
ranger/ritualist ghosts need higher levels, so that they don't die all mostly with 1 hit of a melee chara, like a derwish or a hammer warrioer. say instad of lvl 7 in average, make the average lvl 12
ghosts should be invulnerable versus physical hits. Why ?
because u cant simple hit things, that have NO materia.
only mage classes should be able to attack rangers/ritualists ghosts or players with have on their weapons an elemental enchantment
Alperuzi
/not signed
Your pet should be your pet, not any animal.
However:
/signed
IF they make it so that the different pets are tougher or weaker in different situations. For example the Polar bear could be stronger when used in cold regions, the dune lizard in deserts etc...
Your pet should be your pet, not any animal.
However:
/signed
IF they make it so that the different pets are tougher or weaker in different situations. For example the Polar bear could be stronger when used in cold regions, the dune lizard in deserts etc...
R!ghteous Ind!gnation
/signed (with a reasonable limit to the number of available pets)
tyche7
/signed -- I totally agree. This would rock
ReMus91
/signed
It would be a good idea.
+1
It would be a good idea.
Quote:
| (with a reasonable limit to the number of available pets) |
LobsterMobster
/signed, except it shouldn't be a stable. It should be a terrarium.
Unidimention
/vote yes
I also would like to have some pets with ranged attack if possible
or some pets with elemental attack.
I also would like to have some pets with ranged attack if possible
or some pets with elemental attack.
Woden
/signed.
It really makes sense at this point. I can switch weapons, armor, skills, all without losing access to my old ones. But if I want a new pet, I forever lose the one I've invested time in. Personally, I've had the same wolf since pre-searing, and I'm rather attached to it. Every time I go to charm a new pet, I rethink it because I don't want to have to lose the old one. With three campaigns and now an expansion, all with numerous pets, the time has come for this feature.
I think the best solution would be an NPC (probably in the guild hall) that acts like pet storage. I wouldn't mind paying some gold to store a pet if it meant I could enjoy one of the new ones without fear of losing my original.
Plus, I'd finally be able to do that darn Melandru's Stalker quest in Old Ascalon. Imagine my despair when I first made it to post-searing so long ago and found that my choice of pet meant I couldn't complete a quest for my chosen profession. That always seemed a little broken to me.
It really makes sense at this point. I can switch weapons, armor, skills, all without losing access to my old ones. But if I want a new pet, I forever lose the one I've invested time in. Personally, I've had the same wolf since pre-searing, and I'm rather attached to it. Every time I go to charm a new pet, I rethink it because I don't want to have to lose the old one. With three campaigns and now an expansion, all with numerous pets, the time has come for this feature.
I think the best solution would be an NPC (probably in the guild hall) that acts like pet storage. I wouldn't mind paying some gold to store a pet if it meant I could enjoy one of the new ones without fear of losing my original.
Plus, I'd finally be able to do that darn Melandru's Stalker quest in Old Ascalon. Imagine my despair when I first made it to post-searing so long ago and found that my choice of pet meant I couldn't complete a quest for my chosen profession. That always seemed a little broken to me.
Tender Wolf
Definately! I love animals! I'd like to have one of each pet in the game. ehhehehe WOW has a stable, but only for 3 animals. GW should totally add it.
Sparks Dawnbringer
/signed I almost always take ranger as a second just to have a pet sometimes.
Lord Feathers
Being a ranger player myself how could I possibly say no to this suggestion
I would love the ability to maybe even add pets to my party instead of heroes and roam around as a pack hunter with a hoard of wolves ( this would pose problems using pet skills but I can always dream ). The idea of binding an animal into a signet was pretty cool as well, but instead of the tamer taking our pet from us if we tame a new one he could simply keep that pet and we pay a fee to use that pet again.
I would love the ability to maybe even add pets to my party instead of heroes and roam around as a pack hunter with a hoard of wolves ( this would pose problems using pet skills but I can always dream ). The idea of binding an animal into a signet was pretty cool as well, but instead of the tamer taking our pet from us if we tame a new one he could simply keep that pet and we pay a fee to use that pet again.
Stolen Souls
Signed. Would be nice.
bwillcox
Absolutely YES. Having to discard the "old" pet to get a "new" one seems just so wrong.
Noel Hope
/signed!
I really like the idea of being able to own multiple pets. I love my spider, but it would be nice to be able to charm some of the cute, new GW:EN pets as well!
I really like the idea of being able to own multiple pets. I love my spider, but it would be nice to be able to charm some of the cute, new GW:EN pets as well!
Saraphim
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by trobinson97
/not signed.
I like it the way it is. I've had my black widow Ungoliant .. |
Great name. Remind me never to drop any shiny gems near her!
Quote:
| I know I know, it really sucks when someone comes in and /not signs something you really really would like. |
Marverick
/signed
For practical reasons one evolution isn't good everywhere so I'd like to be able to switch without having to raise a new pet...
Also 4 chapters of pets and we can only have one? I'd like to get a Phoenix or an Eagle but I don't want to dump my Dire Black Widow...
For practical reasons one evolution isn't good everywhere so I'd like to be able to switch without having to raise a new pet...
Also 4 chapters of pets and we can only have one? I'd like to get a Phoenix or an Eagle but I don't want to dump my Dire Black Widow...
Healers Wisper
I am cool with this, I think weshould have different pets and be allowed to use the one at a time. Especially since alot of pet are prestige item anyways.
/Vote yes
/Vote yes
Wulfgast
/signed, and I'm not even a beastmaster. I just think it's a great idea.
To anyone who thinks you should be loyal to one pet... how freaking awesome would it be to have one black wolf and one white wolf, that you alternate between? Maybe I'm just a nerd, but I love the concept. One holds the fort, one comes adventuring with you.
To anyone who thinks you should be loyal to one pet... how freaking awesome would it be to have one black wolf and one white wolf, that you alternate between? Maybe I'm just a nerd, but I love the concept. One holds the fort, one comes adventuring with you.
Mordakai
Allow the HoM to be a Stable...
pingu666
signed
theres kinda a way to work around the restriction, is to get your heros pets, which i do
theres kinda a way to work around the restriction, is to get your heros pets, which i do
flipfly2004
/signed
i want the moa familly reunited ^^
Moa
Black Moa
White Moa
XD
i want the moa familly reunited ^^
Moa
Black Moa
White Moa
XD
vergerefosh
/signed, would be very useful