I would say it was a fair review. They may have given it a little higher rating then I would have, but all it all fair.
http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3163056
l
|
Originally Posted by Wulfgast
With the scathing remarks in that review, I'm surprised it got over a 5.0 after scoring was considered. Seems strange. I personally think 1up really hit the nail on the head with the HoM portion, though.
Anet has made a reputation for themselves by listening to its player base, so they're well-aware that 70-80% of the community is unhappy with GW:EN. I'd expect a very major update in the near future, especially since they've been so quiet about things recently. |
|
Originally Posted by trielementz
the game isn't half bad. it's just that we have expected more of ANet after campaigns 1 thru 3.
|
|
Originally Posted by Kook~NBK~
It sounds to me like the reviewer just looked at all the complaints on fan-site forums and condensed them into his article.
|
|
Originally Posted by Vinraith
I like GWEN, but then I didn't read the prepress for it. It's a nice collection of additional endgame content. Is it the equal of a chapter? Of course not. Does it provide a lot of fun and interesting things to do? I think so. I'd say, in all, it was about $10 overpriced. I'm not at all sorry I bought it, though.
|
|
Originally Posted by cthulhu reborn
I really wonder why people are so upset that Anet wants to entice people to buy the next game.
Movies, books and TV series use cliffhangers and we don't think it's bad and then Anet does it and all of a sudden it's evil and wrong...I think that argument is complete nonesense. |