Originally Posted by Redfeather1975
He's really brutal with his reviews, and so far I agree with them.
And despite the fact we both agree on all the things about the game that weren't fun, in the end we both liked the game. Yes, it's hard to tell. But he actually dug Assassin's Creed. |
Guild Wars Gets a Bad Review
Lord Sojar
Quote:
RPGmaniac
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curse You
I will be the first person to make an FPS that has no guns! Instead, everyone will carry fruit, which they must throw at one another. However, the ultimate weapon shall be the pointed stick!
|
JeniM
To be fair the guy has a point about the graphics
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/8787/gw366sf4.jpg
Oh wait whats this "Graphics" pannel do in options?
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7448/gw367rj8.jpg
Had everything on lowest and a 800x600 resolution in pic one and it still looks pretty good
@Curse You
Got to love the python referance
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/8787/gw366sf4.jpg
Oh wait whats this "Graphics" pannel do in options?
http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7448/gw367rj8.jpg
Had everything on lowest and a 800x600 resolution in pic one and it still looks pretty good
@Curse You
Got to love the python referance
Smurf Minions
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxage
Yes, Warcraft has bad graphics... lol
http://www.wowhead.com/?screenshot=view&3.32248#24911 http://www.wowhead.com/?item=32837 http://www.wowhead.com/?item=32336 http://www.wowhead.com/?screenshot=view&3.32253#24916 http://www.wowhead.com/?screenshot=view&3.32332#27714 Look at the detail on those weapons. |
Lord Sojar
Oh, just another graphical example. These are identical screenshots.
The first is taken with Guild Wars max graphics and 4xAA, post process effects on and best filtering enabled. (Warning: Very high rez, 1920x1200 in link)
http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gw343yz0.jpg
This second one, is lowest settings, Best Filtering and post effects are off. No AA. (Warning, again high rez 1920x1200 link)
http://img338.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gw344jy8.jpg
Hmmm, SLIGHT difference wouldn't you say?
The first is taken with Guild Wars max graphics and 4xAA, post process effects on and best filtering enabled. (Warning: Very high rez, 1920x1200 in link)
http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gw343yz0.jpg
This second one, is lowest settings, Best Filtering and post effects are off. No AA. (Warning, again high rez 1920x1200 link)
http://img338.imageshack.us/my.php?image=gw344jy8.jpg
Hmmm, SLIGHT difference wouldn't you say?
garethporlest18
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahja the Thief
That is why I love him. He tells crap as it is. He isn't afraid to speak his mind about the studios, dev teams, anyone. Unlike IGN and Gamestop, he isn't milking corporate dollars from their coffers.
|
As to this reviewer...*smack* that's all I have to say.
and Curse You..watch out for those banana wielders!
Roo Ella
LOL I'm still laughing at the review
All I can say is he didn't play GW it was some other game he tried
OR
He was a gold seller or duper and got caught out and decided to get his revenge by writing a "Review" ?
All I can say is he didn't play GW it was some other game he tried
OR
He was a gold seller or duper and got caught out and decided to get his revenge by writing a "Review" ?
Fluffiliscious
It sounds like he didn't even bother to read anything about the game, played it for an hour then wrote a review. I probably wouldn't enjoy the game very much if I were left to my own devices to figure out every little nuance. Plus, if he's ever played an MMO before, he should have been able to figure out the "red and blue bars" you have to "manage".
ensoriki
Minimum settings in GW are still nice.
If this guy is reproducing I want quarantine.
If this guy is reproducing I want quarantine.
cebalrai
Just a random blog by a random person who appears to have little knowledge of how the game works.
Rocky Raccoon
Just remember that any idiot can place a review on the internet, but that doesn't mean what they say has any basis in reality. I have always had a short attention span when it comes to pc games and I have been playing GW for over 2 years and still am having fun. If that reviewer played more than a few hours I would be surprised. In my opinion that review is just a bunch of verbal vomit.
Ashe.
Everyone knows the game slows down for a bit around Fort Ranik to Gates of Kryta. It's where all my friends quit and where most fail.
Besides, who cares what people think.
Besides, who cares what people think.
onerabbit
I think he played Presearing with grfx on lowest setting..
[DE]
Quote:
Originally Posted by JeniM
To be fair the guy has a point about the graphics
http://img443.imageshack.us/img443/8787/gw366sf4.jpg Oh wait whats this "Graphics" pannel do in options? http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/7448/gw367rj8.jpg Had everything on lowest and a 800x600 resolution in pic one and it still looks pretty good @Curse You Got to love the python referance |
Shakti
...was he playing the same game?
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, review.
Complaints about exp bars being green? Oh noes, "managing" red and blue bars? Has he never played games or is he smoking some wacky tobaccy?
EDIT to add:
Saying how helpful the GW community is leads me to believe he was not playing GW. I don't think I've seen much helpful other than rare exceptions since the month after release. Or else he never left presear and was unbelievably lucky in who he encountered.
Those who can, do.
Those who can't, review.
Complaints about exp bars being green? Oh noes, "managing" red and blue bars? Has he never played games or is he smoking some wacky tobaccy?
EDIT to add:
Saying how helpful the GW community is leads me to believe he was not playing GW. I don't think I've seen much helpful other than rare exceptions since the month after release. Or else he never left presear and was unbelievably lucky in who he encountered.
Tyla
wow bad review, he cant manage health/energy bars?
also i thought gws was a COrpg not an MMOrpg
also i thought gws was a COrpg not an MMOrpg
Maximumraver
Quote:
Originally Posted by Curse You
Now let's see where this guy goes wrong.
Did this guy play with his graphics on minimum or something? That, sir, is why you failed. That just made me loose any respect I had for this guy. Seriously, has this guy never heard of the idea of managing your health and energy? NO WAI!! Humans adapt? This is preposterous! [/sarcasm] My review of the review: EPIC FAIL. |
Nothing To Add.
Etta
lol that Vekk guy made me laugh. (I think he's Rahja in disguise)
~ Dan ~
Quote:
The game boasted beautiful landscapes and great graphics. But when I played it, I was disappointed. |
street peddler
the internet, even your opinion can be taken seriously..
Balan Makki
This isn't a review, it's only pretending to be.
It's a blog about a boy who wants to grow up to design the Perfect MMO.
It's a blog about a boy who wants to grow up to design the Perfect MMO.
Pyrea
Obviously this guy has no clue, although everyone is entitles to an opinion.
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smurf Minions
look at the worlds around those weapons, mass production+mmo = fail
|
The areas in the newest expansion area simply gorgeous, with some very awesome looking skyboxes throughout. Not to mention that the weapons and armor have some really fancy shading effects to them.
Nonetheless, the graphics are a good reason of it's accessibility. It's something Blizzard's been known for: Trying to avoid the high-end area of graphics so more people can enjoy their products.
DDL
Remember though: he did buy all three campaigns (!), so it doesn't matter what he thinks or how misguided he is, the money is already in Anet's hands.
So who cares?
I do wonder though: what kind of idiot would shell out 70 quid for three linked games upfront..and then discover they don't like them?
Surely buying Prophecies and actually PLAYING it would've been more useful and economical.
So who cares?
I do wonder though: what kind of idiot would shell out 70 quid for three linked games upfront..and then discover they don't like them?
Surely buying Prophecies and actually PLAYING it would've been more useful and economical.
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by DDL
I do wonder though: what kind of idiot would shell out 70 quid for three linked games upfront..and then discover they don't like them?
|
Nonetheless I've been seeing them go pretty cheap at everywhere else.
Eviance
Now now guys, he is likely used to playing Final Fantasy games where the graphics are just uber and instead of little red and blue bars a little guy in a pointy hat comes out, waves his wand in the air, and casts Cure and the numbers go UP! Who needs silly bars! Gah the nerve of game designers!
/sarcasm
As far as the community boards go, he must have been on a guild board of sorts where people post pics of themselves and talk about the muzik they like.
>_>
If the poor soul thinks GW is chunky then he obviously hasn't seen EQ *sighs* It makes my eyes hurt watching my brother get all excited about his uber blocky weapons -_-
/sarcasm
As far as the community boards go, he must have been on a guild board of sorts where people post pics of themselves and talk about the muzik they like.
>_>
If the poor soul thinks GW is chunky then he obviously hasn't seen EQ *sighs* It makes my eyes hurt watching my brother get all excited about his uber blocky weapons -_-
tmr819
The reviewer evidently missed the irony of stating:
Gee, lots of people enjoying a game. Um, uh, what exactly is a game for, if not that? In short, a rather clueless review by a rather clueless reviewer.
Quote:
Unfortunately, this saddened me to see such a huge and thriving community so involved in such a mediocre, standard game. |
Shadow Spirit
Quote:
Originally Posted by Balan Makki
This isn't a review, it's only pretending to be.
It's a blog about a boy who wants to grow up to design the Perfect MMO. |
The mere fact that he identifies himself as an aspiring game designer discredits this review. Real Game designers don't play games and then write blogs about how they suck. They make games that are better instead.
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by tmr819
Gee, lots of people enjoying a game. Um, uh, what exactly is a game for, if not that? In short, a rather clueless review by a rather clueless reviewer.
|
Also:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reviewer
I am a huge mmo(massively-multiplayer online) fan and had heard nothing but good things about Guild Wars
|
Jennie
Quote:
The game boasted beautiful landscapes and great graphics. But when I played it, I was disappointed. Yes, it was significantly better aesthetically than the free mmo’s out there, but this was a major title game. |
Back then I prolly wouldn't have given Guild Wars a raving review because I didn't have as much knowledge about the game. I don't think its this guys fault he didn't like it. Until you delve deeper and get a better over all picture the game can seem pretty boring. I had many "oooooooohhhh!!! Now I get it." points during my first few months of playing. However, it is his fault for publishing the review without an entire understanding for the game :-p lol.
I think the whole article itself speaks to the fact he never played the game enough to make an informed review. As much as I love guild wars I can see how someone could make a review about things that need to be changed or altered in the game but the things this guy brought up were just so crazy. No need to make anymore quotes as its been quoted to pieces lol.
Dev121
These forums are biased. You like the game and that is all that matters, your not gunna say a game you like is crap but someone else will. Yes that wasnt a big enough review for a MMO thats why you should'nt take any notice, doing so is just wasting your time, go play guild wars.
Crom The Pale
WoW...I've spent 4500+ hours playing a game that got a bad review, guess I wasted all that time having fun.
Given that I am no where near the high end of hours spent playing GW I would sugest that the review was done by a person that spent less than 4hours playing or just has no clue what makes a great game to begin with.
Given that I am no where near the high end of hours spent playing GW I would sugest that the review was done by a person that spent less than 4hours playing or just has no clue what makes a great game to begin with.
Croco Clouds
It's just one person's review, who cares...
tepp
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rahja the Thief
Umm, you want good video game reviews?
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/arti...sassin-s-Creed Have fun. He is going to do GW:EN soon. Oh, I can't wait. |
Targren
Curse you > I will be the first person to make an FPS that has no guns!
Hexen.
Hexen.
Darksun
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxage
Look at the detail on those weapons.
|
Bryant Again
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darksun
you're actually saying those are better graphics than GW? You just like flashy glowy weapons. The graphics are still blocky & dated.
|
The bows also have strings on them, I forgot to mention.
Squishy ftw
Quote:
You even had to manage the red bar and blue bar (some sort of health and magic point displays). |
I was speechless for a while after reading just that sentence.
Martin Firestorm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxage
Yes, Warcraft has bad graphics... lol
|
IlikeGW
I don't think any MMO or MMO-alike deserves that great a rating at the end of the day, because they are what they are... dumbed down gameplay with a 'casino drop' aspect to try to keep people hooked. Guild Wars is not above that at all. In the future though inevitably some cool devs will start making gameplay centric MMO's more deserving of kudos and great review scores.