Top 100 gets... Greased Lightning minis! (again)
Chestnut
I for one am glad its greased lightnings again... the mini was far too rare.. even more rare then vizu....
Now I can get one for 500e instead of 1500e +
lol
Still kinda wanted a lisa though.
Now I can get one for 500e instead of 1500e +
lol
Still kinda wanted a lisa though.
Malice Black
o rly?
<filler>
<filler>
Jetdoc
Mordakai
And before this starts another QQ thread...
"Accounts with multiple Top 100 times did not receive multiple miniatures."
"Accounts with multiple Top 100 times did not receive multiple miniatures."
Heikofant
yeah it should be renamed to "Top 58 List".
I made my own list where I wrote who's in the top several Times.
42 Players are "doubled" in the Top 100.
I made my own list where I wrote who's in the top several Times.
42 Players are "doubled" in the Top 100.
Mordakai
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heikofant
yeah it should be renamed to "Top 58 List".
I made my own list where I wrote who's in the top several Times. 42 Players are "doubled" in the Top 100. |
Right?
??Ripskin
I got 157k, was I in the top 100?
...er...crap I don't think so.
...er...crap I don't think so.
Polgara Val
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mordakai
Right, but they still give out 100 awards, so it's not like those who repeat on the list hurt anyone.
|
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do?
Pol
Mordakai
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polgara Val
Actually thats not been shown yet, a friend of mine just got out of the top 100 so he is probably about 105?
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do? Pol |
ShadowsRequiem
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polgara Val
Actually thats not been shown yet, a friend of mine just got out of the top 100 so he is probably about 105?
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do? Pol |
>_>
Heikofant
Yeah I hope anet can fixe that list.
Imo it should be easy, they just check the Top 24h of the last 3 days and remove the doubled.
Don't know, whats there problem.
Imo it should be easy, they just check the Top 24h of the last 3 days and remove the doubled.
Don't know, whats there problem.
Sword
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polgara Val
Actually thats not been shown yet, a friend of mine just got out of the top 100 so he is probably about 105?
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do? Pol |
but gogo ekelon , #100
i talked to records guy at 2:58-9 and he was #99, at 3:01 he was #100
Polgara Val
I am sure Gaile or some programmer workng for ANET will tell you thats not the way it works or something, i find ANET to be very communicative most of the time but when it comes to doing something about a small issue even if it is a small part of the game they dont bother because its just a small part.
I think i am in one of those people outside the top 100 to probably 140 or something but I got nothing either.
Pol
I think i am in one of those people outside the top 100 to probably 140 or something but I got nothing either.
Pol
Scheda
Quote:
Originally Posted by Polgara Val
Actually thats not been shown yet, a friend of mine just got out of the top 100 so he is probably about 105?
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do? Pol |
So now, with 42 times that should be deleted, how comes it that my brother doesn't get a beetle? That's only 400 points difference to #100! Where should the other 40 scores suddenly have come from?
I think Anets fix on that isn't working right.
Polgara Val
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scheda
Same with my brother. Worst time on the list now is Ekelon with 476,7xx points. My brother got 476,3xx. The time he flunked out he was about 4 places below him (got a screen with both their names).
So now, with 42 times that should be deleted, how comes it that my brother doesn't get a beetle? That's only 400 points difference to #100! Where should the other 40 scores suddenly have come from? I think Anets fix on that isn't working right. |
I would like to think ANET would want to fix this to give out as promised by the event "100 prizes" instead of 40 due to doubles.
Pol
Edit; I am sure Little Jack is just as confused about this as i am
evenfall
It is likely the server only keep tracks of the top 100 scores and info outside the top 100 are lost. So it is probably too late now since there is no way of identifying the top 100 accounts(unless someone bothers to go through all the log).
Heikofant
Quote:
Originally Posted by evenfall
It is likely the server only keep tracks of the top 100 scores and info outside the top 100 are lost. So it is probably too late now since there is no way of identifying the top 100 accounts(unless someone bothers to go through all the log).
|
just take the "Top 100 last 24h" times
Madbull2
I would certainly hope Anet fixes this problem . I, like some other people, was one of the unlucky few that was just barely not in the top 100 because other players have more than one place in the top 100. It's absurd and needs to be fixed.
Polgara Val
I cant see why it should be such a big problem to take a look at the race logs, remove the people who have double or triple times, then put in the people who are just underneath the top 100 and give them there prizes.
100 mini beetles for the top 100 players not 40 beetles for 40 something players...
Pol
100 mini beetles for the top 100 players not 40 beetles for 40 something players...
Pol
Scheda
Quote:
Originally Posted by evenfall
It is likely the server only keep tracks of the top 100 scores and info outside the top 100 are lost. So it is probably too late now since there is no way of identifying the top 100 accounts(unless someone bothers to go through all the log).
|
Polgara Val
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scheda
If that's the case, I'll humbly give my screens to Anet where they would undoubtedly see what place my brother was on before and that he deserves his beetle.
|
Pol
Jetdoc
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chestnut
Now I can get one for 500e instead of 1500e +
|
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10254854
Draikin
Malice Black
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetdoc
Doesn't look like the new crop has deflated the price that much...
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10254854 |
900-1200e
Polgara Val
Quote:
Originally Posted by Draikin
|
Pol
XiaoTheBlade
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetdoc
Doesn't look like the new crop has deflated the price that much...
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10254854 |
Sword
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malice Black
They'll drop in a month or two. Once the big spenders have theirs, price will go lower.
900-1200e |
Last year people sold them for ~250 ecto first week , 2 months later they were around 600-700. and lately beetles are 1500+xx arms . just like every other rare mini the price will constatly go up
Aerian_Skybane
Not to shout the whole greedy thing, but why does everyone want recognition of NOT making the top 100? The people who mutiple top 100 scored earned it (hopefully), and they get skunked by not getting multiple minis. That to me makes sense, but why would the list ship down until 100 minis were given. You didn't earn a top 100 spot, someone with less of a life and better "twich" reflexes who remembered the course like their mothers teet as a baby did multiple times.
Sigh whatever though, continue to cry about something.
If there was cheating, then I can understand, but cmon now.
Sigh whatever though, continue to cry about something.
If there was cheating, then I can understand, but cmon now.
Madbull2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aerian_Skybane
Not to shout the whole greedy thing, but why does everyone want recognition of NOT making the top 100? The people who mutiple top 100 scored earned it (hopefully), and they get skunked by not getting multiple minis. That to me makes sense, but why would the list ship down until 100 minis were given. You didn't earn a top 100 spot, someone with less of a life and better "twich" reflexes who remembered the course like their mothers teet as a baby did multiple times.
Sigh whatever though, continue to cry about something. If there was cheating, then I can understand, but cmon now. |
Don't be such an ignorant fool. To use this analogy, If I run a race and get first place, does that mean I'm also entitled to second? How about third? Or let's just go with thirtieth? Well, why not right? I mean my time was better than those people so clearly I deserve their place as well by your logic correct? Of course not. If someone made it onto the top 100 list then they have already proven they are good enough to be on that list. Meaning, any other entries that person gets on that list is just stealing slots from other people. It's supposed to be a top 100 racers list, not a list of 100 slots that can be filled by anyone (which is what it turned in to) . I'm guessing you were nowhere near the top 100 anyway, which is why you would make such a stupid statement.
Feathermoore Rep
There's two ways to look at the top 100. You can view it as the high score list, and you can view it as the top 100 players. Personally i think it should be the top 100 players. I don't need to go onto a list and see that one guy has posted 50 times, for me to say wow he's good at this. I don't even need to see two times. I need one. Whether it was luck or skill, or both doesn't matter in my eyes, as a top score is a top score.
The extreme example of this is if one guy managed to post the top 100 times, is that a fair representation of the scores? Should only he be rewarded with the prize because he claimed all 100 spots on the chart? No all that means is he just played the sh!t out of RBR.
So in my opinion I'd rather go on and see the top 100 racers, and accordingly their personal high scores. I raced with a few people who posted top 100 times. Some didn't get lucky and just stopped in the cave. Others kept racing and posted times. One guy got a decent run, and posted a decent time, not quite top 100 worthy, because i didn't KD him. Those i raced with frequently i wanted to race a fair race, and race for skill. If they got out in the lead, i wouldn't screw up a potential record/non-record run, just out of spite, in hopes maybe if i got the same run, they wouldn't kd me.
RBR was by no means hard to win. Complete nubs racing for 3rd and 4rth place, people KD chaining the leader out of spite with no chance to win, lack of comprehension of the course and skills, etc etc, were every where. I'm not saying I'm awesome, but i'm not bad. As well, as i may not have ended up with a top 100 time, but i wasn't that far off on several runs. I raced for fun and to see my skill against other players, and i took note of several of the names on the top 100 list, hoping by chance to play them.
But hey thats my take on the top 100 list. Anet apparently thought that it should be just the top 100 scores, and for that only they only once again gave out less than half of the amount of mini pets possible.
With the top 100 list, only allowing one score per account, it would only give more people prizes. It wouldn't take the prizes away from anyone, so you can't complain there. All it would do is actually award 100 prizes like the event was intended to. Why do you think they had to change it to one prize per account? BECAUSE THEY SCREWED UP! and didn't want to let several people monopolize the economy on the mini pet by earning multiples.
But whatever, half the time, its like talking to a wall on here, some people just don't get it.
The extreme example of this is if one guy managed to post the top 100 times, is that a fair representation of the scores? Should only he be rewarded with the prize because he claimed all 100 spots on the chart? No all that means is he just played the sh!t out of RBR.
So in my opinion I'd rather go on and see the top 100 racers, and accordingly their personal high scores. I raced with a few people who posted top 100 times. Some didn't get lucky and just stopped in the cave. Others kept racing and posted times. One guy got a decent run, and posted a decent time, not quite top 100 worthy, because i didn't KD him. Those i raced with frequently i wanted to race a fair race, and race for skill. If they got out in the lead, i wouldn't screw up a potential record/non-record run, just out of spite, in hopes maybe if i got the same run, they wouldn't kd me.
RBR was by no means hard to win. Complete nubs racing for 3rd and 4rth place, people KD chaining the leader out of spite with no chance to win, lack of comprehension of the course and skills, etc etc, were every where. I'm not saying I'm awesome, but i'm not bad. As well, as i may not have ended up with a top 100 time, but i wasn't that far off on several runs. I raced for fun and to see my skill against other players, and i took note of several of the names on the top 100 list, hoping by chance to play them.
But hey thats my take on the top 100 list. Anet apparently thought that it should be just the top 100 scores, and for that only they only once again gave out less than half of the amount of mini pets possible.
With the top 100 list, only allowing one score per account, it would only give more people prizes. It wouldn't take the prizes away from anyone, so you can't complain there. All it would do is actually award 100 prizes like the event was intended to. Why do you think they had to change it to one prize per account? BECAUSE THEY SCREWED UP! and didn't want to let several people monopolize the economy on the mini pet by earning multiples.
But whatever, half the time, its like talking to a wall on here, some people just don't get it.
Madbull2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathermoore Rep
There's two ways to look at the top 100. You can view it as the high score list, and you can view it as the top 100 players. Personally i think it should be the top 100 players. I don't need to go onto a list and see that one guy has posted 50 times, for me to say wow he's good at this. I don't even need to see two times. I need one. Whether it was luck or skill, or both doesn't matter in my eyes, as a top score is a top score.
The extreme example of this is if one guy managed to post the top 100 times, is that a fair representation of the scores? Should only he be rewarded with the prize because he claimed all 100 spots on the chart? No all that means is he just played the sh!t out of RBR. So in my opinion I'd rather go on and see the top 100 racers, and accordingly their personal high scores. I raced with a few people who posted top 100 times. Some didn't get lucky and just stopped in the cave. Others kept racing and posted times. One guy got a decent run, and posted a decent time, not quite top 100 worthy, because i didn't KD him. Those i raced with frequently i wanted to race a fair race, and race for skill. If they got out in the lead, i wouldn't screw up a potential record/non-record run, just out of spite, in hopes maybe if i got the same run, they wouldn't kd me. RBR was by no means hard to win. Complete nubs racing for 3rd and 4rth place, people KD chaining the leader out of spite with no chance to win, lack of comprehension of the course and skills, etc etc, were every where. I'm not saying I'm awesome, but i'm not bad. As well, as i may not have ended up with a top 100 time, but i wasn't that far off on several runs. I raced for fun and to see my skill against other players, and i took note of several of the names on the top 100 list, hoping by chance to play them. But hey thats my take on the top 100 list. Anet apparently thought that it should be just the top 100 scores, and for that only they only once again gave out less than half of the amount of mini pets possible. With the top 100 list, only allowing one score per account, it would only give more people prizes. It wouldn't take the prizes away from anyone, so you can't complain there. All it would do is actually award 100 prizes like the event was intended to. Why do you think they had to change it to one prize per account? BECAUSE THEY SCREWED UP! and didn't want to let several people monopolize the economy on the mini pet by earning multiples. But whatever, half the time, its like talking to a wall on here, some people just don't get it. |
Gregslot
Well this is just like winning a championship and taking gold, silver and bronze medal!
And god dammit people are buying them for 1500 ectos! Thats a lot of gold, how the hell does these people get these much ectos?!
And god dammit people are buying them for 1500 ectos! Thats a lot of gold, how the hell does these people get these much ectos?!
Rothaga
Why would people be so pissed if people got multiple? That only means more supply, which would decrease the price a bit....
anonymous
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rothaga
Why would people be so pissed if people got multiple? That only means more supply, which would decrease the price a bit....
|
vixro
Yes, multiple rare items should not be awarded. If it was a prize like a consumable or something, then multiples would be ok but not a rare mini.
enter_the_zone
Most damning of all is the NPC dialog. Sorry Anet, but I'm not even surprised your own NPC's make liars of you anymore. GG once again, and GL with the whole GW2 thing....
Ekelon
I'm going to have a good laugh if by next year they FIX the npc to say top 100 scores. So what now? People who don't get top 100 scores will still not get a beetle so nothing much changes... I wonder if people will still complain then.
Madbull2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ekelon
I'm going to have a good laugh if by next year they FIX the npc to say top 100 scores. So what now? People who don't get top 100 scores will still not get a beetle so nothing much changes... I wonder if people will still complain then.
|
Scary Raebbit
Grind more races so you can fill up more spots and stop people from getting minis.
Grind > everything
Grind > everything
Pleikki
I did get 3 points towards Gamer title did i get one? lol i guess i didnt