Now I can get one for 500e instead of 1500e +
lol
Still kinda wanted a lisa though.

Chestnut
Malice Black
Jetdoc
Mordakai
Heikofant
Mordakai
Originally Posted by Heikofant
yeah it should be renamed to "Top 58 List".
I made my own list where I wrote who's in the top several Times. 42 Players are "doubled" in the Top 100. |
??Ripskin
Polgara Val
Originally Posted by Mordakai
Right, but they still give out 100 awards, so it's not like those who repeat on the list hurt anyone.
|
Mordakai
Originally Posted by Polgara Val
Actually thats not been shown yet, a friend of mine just got out of the top 100 so he is probably about 105?
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do? Pol |
ShadowsRequiem
Originally Posted by Polgara Val
Actually thats not been shown yet, a friend of mine just got out of the top 100 so he is probably about 105?
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do? Pol |
Heikofant
Sword
Originally Posted by Polgara Val
Actually thats not been shown yet, a friend of mine just got out of the top 100 so he is probably about 105?
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do? Pol |
Polgara Val
Scheda
Originally Posted by Polgara Val
Actually thats not been shown yet, a friend of mine just got out of the top 100 so he is probably about 105?
But he got nothing, so the thing i think only 40 something minis were handed out (due to doubles on the list) and the rest were ignored, annoying but heck what can we do? Pol |
Polgara Val
Originally Posted by Scheda
Same with my brother. Worst time on the list now is Ekelon with 476,7xx points. My brother got 476,3xx. The time he flunked out he was about 4 places below him (got a screen with both their names).
So now, with 42 times that should be deleted, how comes it that my brother doesn't get a beetle? That's only 400 points difference to #100! Where should the other 40 scores suddenly have come from? I think Anets fix on that isn't working right. |
evenfall
Heikofant
Originally Posted by evenfall
It is likely the server only keep tracks of the top 100 scores and info outside the top 100 are lost. So it is probably too late now since there is no way of identifying the top 100 accounts(unless someone bothers to go through all the log).
|
Madbull2
Polgara Val
Scheda
Originally Posted by evenfall
It is likely the server only keep tracks of the top 100 scores and info outside the top 100 are lost. So it is probably too late now since there is no way of identifying the top 100 accounts(unless someone bothers to go through all the log).
|
Polgara Val
Originally Posted by Scheda
If that's the case, I'll humbly give my screens to Anet where they would undoubtedly see what place my brother was on before and that he deserves his beetle.
![]() |
Jetdoc
Originally Posted by Chestnut
Now I can get one for 500e instead of 1500e +
|
Draikin
Malice Black
Originally Posted by Jetdoc
Doesn't look like the new crop has deflated the price that much...
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10254854 ![]() |
Polgara Val
Originally Posted by Draikin
|
XiaoTheBlade
Originally Posted by Jetdoc
Doesn't look like the new crop has deflated the price that much...
http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10254854 ![]() |
Sword
Originally Posted by Malice Black
They'll drop in a month or two. Once the big spenders have theirs, price will go lower.
900-1200e |
Aerian_Skybane
Madbull2
Originally Posted by Aerian_Skybane
Not to shout the whole greedy thing, but why does everyone want recognition of NOT making the top 100? The people who mutiple top 100 scored earned it (hopefully), and they get skunked by not getting multiple minis. That to me makes sense, but why would the list ship down until 100 minis were given. You didn't earn a top 100 spot, someone with less of a life and better "twich" reflexes who remembered the course like their mothers teet as a baby did multiple times.
Sigh whatever though, continue to cry about something. If there was cheating, then I can understand, but cmon now. |
Feathermoore Rep
Madbull2
Originally Posted by Feathermoore Rep
There's two ways to look at the top 100. You can view it as the high score list, and you can view it as the top 100 players. Personally i think it should be the top 100 players. I don't need to go onto a list and see that one guy has posted 50 times, for me to say wow he's good at this. I don't even need to see two times. I need one. Whether it was luck or skill, or both doesn't matter in my eyes, as a top score is a top score.
The extreme example of this is if one guy managed to post the top 100 times, is that a fair representation of the scores? Should only he be rewarded with the prize because he claimed all 100 spots on the chart? No all that means is he just played the sh!t out of RBR. So in my opinion I'd rather go on and see the top 100 racers, and accordingly their personal high scores. I raced with a few people who posted top 100 times. Some didn't get lucky and just stopped in the cave. Others kept racing and posted times. One guy got a decent run, and posted a decent time, not quite top 100 worthy, because i didn't KD him. Those i raced with frequently i wanted to race a fair race, and race for skill. If they got out in the lead, i wouldn't screw up a potential record/non-record run, just out of spite, in hopes maybe if i got the same run, they wouldn't kd me. RBR was by no means hard to win. Complete nubs racing for 3rd and 4rth place, people KD chaining the leader out of spite with no chance to win, lack of comprehension of the course and skills, etc etc, were every where. I'm not saying I'm awesome, but i'm not bad. As well, as i may not have ended up with a top 100 time, but i wasn't that far off on several runs. I raced for fun and to see my skill against other players, and i took note of several of the names on the top 100 list, hoping by chance to play them. But hey thats my take on the top 100 list. Anet apparently thought that it should be just the top 100 scores, and for that only they only once again gave out less than half of the amount of mini pets possible. With the top 100 list, only allowing one score per account, it would only give more people prizes. It wouldn't take the prizes away from anyone, so you can't complain there. All it would do is actually award 100 prizes like the event was intended to. Why do you think they had to change it to one prize per account? BECAUSE THEY SCREWED UP! and didn't want to let several people monopolize the economy on the mini pet by earning multiples. But whatever, half the time, its like talking to a wall on here, some people just don't get it. |
Gregslot
Rothaga
anonymous
Originally Posted by Rothaga
Why would people be so pissed if people got multiple? That only means more supply, which would decrease the price a bit....
|
vixro
enter_the_zone
Ekelon
Madbull2
Originally Posted by Ekelon
I'm going to have a good laugh if by next year they FIX the npc to say top 100 scores. So what now? People who don't get top 100 scores will still not get a beetle so nothing much changes... I wonder if people will still complain then.
|
Scary Raebbit
Pleikki