Um yeah, E6850 sorry for the confusion, and thanks heaps for the advice. In my part of the world at least, the E6850 and the Q6600 are the same price - bout the equivalent of USD$320
In summary then:
1. Dual or quad work fine for most, but they don't work fine for others..
2. If I have to force one core, more processor speed (v.s no. of core's) is more useful (at least for the app I am forcing to one core).
3. But, more cores is better if I am running multiple apps.
Just on this future proofing concept, I only upgrade every 3 years or so (wives get grumpy if its too often) I was thinking that perhaps in a year there might be a lot more multi-threaded apps/games, and Vista might be fixed enough to use.
For those that questioned whether quad was necessary, you don't agree, or just don't rate the Q6600?
x


