I'm sure everyone knows how little effort it takes now days to earn Legendary Survivor title, especially with necros running around and getting it within 10 hours or so.
I have personally been attempting to gain this title by purely means of doing missions and quests for last 7 months. Frankly, it pisses me off to see so little effort taken into achieving a title which actually should be incredibly nerve-wrecking and time consuming.
I initially imagined how it'd be if Legendary Survivor required players to complete all the missions in the game without dying. Although it'd definitely encourage people running others through the mission, it's still more effort than 55/SS farming and it's not exactly easy to run through some missions.
Then, not everyone owns all 3 chapters of Guild Wars. Well, titles like Defender of Elona are also only available to those owning specific chapters, but I feel Survivor Title is a different story. Then again, People Know Me titles pretty seem to require owning of all 3 chapters and GWEN. Anyways, I thought up of following three options...
1. Survivor Title is dependent on experience but it is also affected by the number of chapters you have completed. Say, a player must be level 20 and have completed all missions in one chapter without dying to be Survivor. The player must have 587,500 experience and have completed all the missions in two chapters without dying to be Indomitable Survivor. Finally, the player must have gained 1,337,500 experience and completed every mission in all three chapters without dying to become a Legendary Survivor.
2. Create new title with requirements just like the ones mentioned in (1.) except for the experiences.
3. Make it so that becoming legendary survivor requires completing all missions in a campaign as well as 200 unrepeated quests (No Kilroy). The experience requirement probably should still be remained. This feels weak though. It's not really hard going through prophecies or factions and not dying.
Seriously doubt this would be implanted but one may dream.
Changing the Requirements for Survivor Title
poasiods
Gift3d
Even IF an idea such as the ones you stated were implemented (except the entirely new title idea), there'd still be the hundreds of talentless title grinders who HFF/kilroy'd their Survivor, so it'd still be the same prestige-less title it is now. Survivor's basically just an extra really easy title to have towards KoaBD now.
Alex the Great
nope, that means that you would be taking away the ability for some people to get survivor, which is stupid.
and you don't need every campaign to get the first couple levels of KoaBD, people had it before the campaigns where realesed, and it can be done now.
and you don't need every campaign to get the first couple levels of KoaBD, people had it before the campaigns where realesed, and it can be done now.
Gift3d
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Alex the Great
nope, that means that you would be taking away the ability for some people to get survivor, which is stupid.
and you don't need every campaign to get the first couple levels of KoaBD, people had it before the campaigns where realesed, and it can be done now. |
MithranArkanere
As something that cannot be retried again anytime, it's an aberration in GW.
A vestige from old times and old ways.
Whatever it is they way, it must be fair with those that already have the title, but without having to re-roll characters to retry it again.
You ways are not like that.
A vestige from old times and old ways.
Whatever it is they way, it must be fair with those that already have the title, but without having to re-roll characters to retry it again.
You ways are not like that.
Tyla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gift3d
Even IF an idea such as the ones you stated were implemented (except the entirely new title idea), there'd still be the hundreds of talentless title grinders who HFF/kilroy'd their Survivor, so it'd still be the same prestige-less title it is now. Survivor's basically just an extra really easy title to have towards KoaBD now.
|
Ancient Menace
Everyone stop trying to change the survivor title. If you don't like the way it is, don't get it.
Stop trying to change the survivor title.
STOP trying to change the survivor title.
STOP TRYING to change the survivor title.
STOP TRYING TO change the survivor title.
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE the survivor title.
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE survivor title.
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR title.
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR TITLE!
Clear enough?
Stop trying to change the survivor title.
STOP trying to change the survivor title.
STOP TRYING to change the survivor title.
STOP TRYING TO change the survivor title.
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE the survivor title.
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE survivor title.
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR title.
STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR TITLE!
Clear enough?
snaek
most titles r already very easy to get
if ur getting titles to feel more "1337" than others...
than ur gettin em for teh wrong reason
besides, wut of the ppl who already have legendary survivor?
do u expect anet to take the title away?
if not...then ppl will qq sayin, "survivor title is sooo hard to get now...all the ppl before had it so easy...its not fair"
if ur getting titles to feel more "1337" than others...
than ur gettin em for teh wrong reason
besides, wut of the ppl who already have legendary survivor?
do u expect anet to take the title away?
if not...then ppl will qq sayin, "survivor title is sooo hard to get now...all the ppl before had it so easy...its not fair"
Dallcingi
I dont like the idea...
If you survived for X amount of time and have X amount of exp then you deserve the title.
If you survived for X amount of time and have X amount of exp then you deserve the title.
El Presidente
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ancient Menace
Everyone stop trying to change the survivor title. If you don't like the way it is, don't get it.
Stop trying to change the survivor title. STOP trying to change the survivor title. STOP TRYING to change the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO change the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR TITLE! Clear enough? |
poasiods
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ancient Menace
Everyone stop trying to change the survivor title. If you don't like the way it is, don't get it.
Stop trying to change the survivor title. STOP trying to change the survivor title. STOP TRYING to change the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO change the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR TITLE! Clear enough? |
I suppose I was writing more as a ranting than a serious suggestion. Does no one else see anything wrong with the title then? Well, at least the way it is achieved nowadays. With all the complaints about Guild Wars being Grind Wars, this seems to be one of the main representations of what the gameplay has turned into.
Such aspects of the game pretty much buried my first idealization of Guild Wars (No grinding, no farm, etc) alive.
Ancient Menace
Here's a reason, then. We, as a community, are pretty damn tired of hearing "waaah I can't get/don't want/don't like the way that XXX title is achieved/displayed/too easy/too hard". We're sick of it, especially in regards to the survivor title.
As for my "creative and effort" (??) it's the only way to get the point through to people like you. It made you notice; therefore it served it's purpose.
Not quite getting the support you thought you would in this thread, are you.
As for my "creative and effort" (??) it's the only way to get the point through to people like you. It made you notice; therefore it served it's purpose.
Not quite getting the support you thought you would in this thread, are you.
poasiods
So you think what you posted up there was a legitimate way of explaining that Survivor Title already had its share of discussion?
As nice of you as it is to voluntarily represent the whole Guild Wars Guru community as whole and be so apt at judging people after reading two posts by them, you really aren't saying anything other than that you're tired of seeing this topic.
Don't feel obliged to click on this topic if you're sick of hearing about it. If no one shows interest, surely it'll die unless someone else brings it up again. I'm sorry that you, for some reason, can't contain yourself when you see these topics over and over again, but all you did in this thread is tell people to stop posting about survivor titles in the rudest way possible with no reasoning or insight.
As nice of you as it is to voluntarily represent the whole Guild Wars Guru community as whole and be so apt at judging people after reading two posts by them, you really aren't saying anything other than that you're tired of seeing this topic.
Don't feel obliged to click on this topic if you're sick of hearing about it. If no one shows interest, surely it'll die unless someone else brings it up again. I'm sorry that you, for some reason, can't contain yourself when you see these topics over and over again, but all you did in this thread is tell people to stop posting about survivor titles in the rudest way possible with no reasoning or insight.
legion_rat
Survivor is about Xp vs Death toll. Simple. It always has been. Before EotN it was only marginally more difficult. It depends on the proffession on how hard it is to earn. I can do it on a ranger in about 3 days, for first tier. I have twice just to prove I could. As for the other ranks, people seem to do it fairly well.
From what I learned gaining it. go with decent skills. elites are not needed. I also start in factions, very easy to get to 11 or higher fast and with out deaths. The rest to first tier is easy. take guildies if you can, avoid pugs at all costs. I dont think the change is needed because it limits people who do not possess all of the games. Survivor was a get to 20 with no deaths thing. There were many people who did this waaaay before the title just to try and do it.
You talk about how much trouble you are having getting the title now and you want to make it harder? Explain that reasoning.
~the rat~
From what I learned gaining it. go with decent skills. elites are not needed. I also start in factions, very easy to get to 11 or higher fast and with out deaths. The rest to first tier is easy. take guildies if you can, avoid pugs at all costs. I dont think the change is needed because it limits people who do not possess all of the games. Survivor was a get to 20 with no deaths thing. There were many people who did this waaaay before the title just to try and do it.
You talk about how much trouble you are having getting the title now and you want to make it harder? Explain that reasoning.
~the rat~
Ancient Menace
Your first mistake is believing that I owe you an explanation. I don't. If you didn't want people to disagree with you, you probably shouldn't have posted here. And I'll feel free to judge someone via two forum posts if I like. If you sound like a whiny little bit** the first two times I ever read what you wrote, then you're probably a whiny little bit** the next 200 posts. It's called generalization, and it's usually pretty accurate.
Second, I believe that my views are representative of the community. In fact, I think that the response that you've gotten in this thread has proven my point. Just because you don't like the way that I said it doesn't make it not true.
Third;
Likewise. Don't feel obliged to post a fix the Survivor title if you don't like the way it's achieved. 
You honestly believe that a game should be "nerve-wrAcking and time consuming"?? Have fun explaining that one.
Second, I believe that my views are representative of the community. In fact, I think that the response that you've gotten in this thread has proven my point. Just because you don't like the way that I said it doesn't make it not true.
Third;
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by poasiods
Don't feel obliged to click on this topic if you're sick of hearing about it.
|
Quote:
| Frankly, it pisses me off to see so little effort taken into achieving a title which actually should be incredibly nerve-wrecking and time consuming. |
kazjun
/unsigned
Title is about getting xp without dying. Shouldn't matter how they get the xp. No need to make it more complicated. Plus trying to tie it to the guardian title and then something like a quest title is bad. And limiting the ability to max it to only people who own all chapters is bad.
Title is about getting xp without dying. Shouldn't matter how they get the xp. No need to make it more complicated. Plus trying to tie it to the guardian title and then something like a quest title is bad. And limiting the ability to max it to only people who own all chapters is bad.
poasiods
In response to legion_rat, level 20 requires 140k exp while legendary survivor needs 1,337k exp. Reaching level 20 is a piece of cake for majority of people but getting legendary survivor takes... well, a while if you're going through the storyline.
Ancient Menace, the reason I singled out your post in the first place is because everyone else offered some reasoning as to why changing the way Survivor title works won't be desirable. I threw it out as a suggestion/discussion topic to see what others have to say about it. I don't seriously think it's going to be implanted but wanted to others' opinions regarding the title. What I wasn't expecting is the mass of useless text you threw out, which you're still bent on defending to be a legitimate argument by even going as far as saying your generalization of others are accurate enough to spit out snobby comments.
I suppose in that sense, I'm judging you too from your post, which makes you look like a moron, in my opinion, as do your other posts in this thread.
I personally hate seeing so called 'flame-war' in a thread and really don't feel like continuing this anymore, partially because you're so bent on trying to be as offensive as possible with no real argument. Feel free to call me a whiny bi*** one more time if it makes you feel victorious but I'd rather respond to other people who actually make sense.
Ancient Menace, the reason I singled out your post in the first place is because everyone else offered some reasoning as to why changing the way Survivor title works won't be desirable. I threw it out as a suggestion/discussion topic to see what others have to say about it. I don't seriously think it's going to be implanted but wanted to others' opinions regarding the title. What I wasn't expecting is the mass of useless text you threw out, which you're still bent on defending to be a legitimate argument by even going as far as saying your generalization of others are accurate enough to spit out snobby comments.
I suppose in that sense, I'm judging you too from your post, which makes you look like a moron, in my opinion, as do your other posts in this thread.
I personally hate seeing so called 'flame-war' in a thread and really don't feel like continuing this anymore, partially because you're so bent on trying to be as offensive as possible with no real argument. Feel free to call me a whiny bi*** one more time if it makes you feel victorious but I'd rather respond to other people who actually make sense.
Shayne Hawke
As much as I'd like to see it happen, the Survivor title will never change, and I will deliver 100k to the first person that catches me false if it changes so that I can get it on my Ranger that has ~1k deaths.
Reasons why Survivor won't change:
- ANet doesn't care.
- It would become one more title to max for KoaBD which, according to the guide posted on the forum here, would make the titles to achieve for GWAMM a set 30, instead of 29-30 and an optional.
- Most ideas don't take into account people that already have the title in the cheapened method vs. new people gaining the title.
- Because LDoA merely exists. That's a joke of a title how it works. This problem will persist until it can be gained by anyone, which kills the purpose of the title, or until it disappears on leaving pre-Searing, which would be the right thing to do.
- People would probably complain moreso than they do now.
- It's unnecessary for getting GWAMM, which means it can be done without.
There's probably a few others, but the highlight is probably because of conflicts with LDoA. Both titles are set to be exclusive, so until ANet decides to change both at once, neither will be adjusted, or balance won't be served, people will complain, and ANet will lose.
I'm sure they'd rather be lazy than fail.
I'm sorry, but what the hell kind of statement is that? Why would someone propose a fix to something if they didn't feel it was broken?
---
As another little bit, I'll post a search that I did on previous Survivor-related threads. Feel free to browse those on more discussion on this subject. One thread I didn't find in that search, I think, is this one, which I believe discusses an excellent way of fixing Survivor and LDoA with one parallel adjustment to both titles.
Reasons why Survivor won't change:
- ANet doesn't care.
- It would become one more title to max for KoaBD which, according to the guide posted on the forum here, would make the titles to achieve for GWAMM a set 30, instead of 29-30 and an optional.
- Most ideas don't take into account people that already have the title in the cheapened method vs. new people gaining the title.
- Because LDoA merely exists. That's a joke of a title how it works. This problem will persist until it can be gained by anyone, which kills the purpose of the title, or until it disappears on leaving pre-Searing, which would be the right thing to do.
- People would probably complain moreso than they do now.
- It's unnecessary for getting GWAMM, which means it can be done without.
There's probably a few others, but the highlight is probably because of conflicts with LDoA. Both titles are set to be exclusive, so until ANet decides to change both at once, neither will be adjusted, or balance won't be served, people will complain, and ANet will lose.
I'm sure they'd rather be lazy than fail.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ancient Menace
Don't feel obliged to post a fix the Survivor title if you don't like the way it's achieved.
|
---
As another little bit, I'll post a search that I did on previous Survivor-related threads. Feel free to browse those on more discussion on this subject. One thread I didn't find in that search, I think, is this one, which I believe discusses an excellent way of fixing Survivor and LDoA with one parallel adjustment to both titles.
You can't see me
Horrible idea is horrible.
The people above me have said a lot to back that up, including that this isn't the idea around survivor, and that people should not have to buy all three campaigns to receive a single title that has no campaign link in the first place.
Oh, and by the way, the survivor title isn't broken. Nor is the way you accomplish it. However, I do think it should be account based.
The people above me have said a lot to back that up, including that this isn't the idea around survivor, and that people should not have to buy all three campaigns to receive a single title that has no campaign link in the first place.
Oh, and by the way, the survivor title isn't broken. Nor is the way you accomplish it. However, I do think it should be account based.
Lycan Nibbler
I would just like anet to nerf the boxing and hff to stop these being a cheap source of XP and then I wouldnt mind a thing (Waits to duck the flak from the hffers! 
).
Adding extra requirements to the title isn't an option IMHO - I honestly wonder how many have a char that has completed a chapter without dying... not many Im sure due to the fact that just one lag spike can spell the demise of a char.
).Adding extra requirements to the title isn't an option IMHO - I honestly wonder how many have a char that has completed a chapter without dying... not many Im sure due to the fact that just one lag spike can spell the demise of a char.
Dervish Kid
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dallcingi
I dont like the idea...
If you survived for X amount of time and have X amount of exp then you deserve the title. |
1.Rank 12 Lux
2.Rank 12 Kurz
3.Rank 12 Legendary Champion
4.Rank 2 Life of The Party
5.Rank 7 Source of Wisdom
6.Rank 6 Blessed by Fate
7.Rank 7 Cursed By Fate
8.Rank 15 Legendary Hero
9.Rank 12 For Gamer
10.Rank 12 Legendary Gladiator
pumpkin pie
I like the idea, actually, if you survived the whole story line, thats the point in my opinion, if your hero have die, "who save tyria/cantha/elona?" by completing the missions and quests in one single campaign without dying, and not by counting the experience. you get legendary prophecies survivors. legendary tyria survivors, legendary elona survivor, if you have all 3 you get and extra one legendary grandmaster survivors.
sound pretty cool.
a /signed
this way you do not need all 3 campaigns to get the title.
sound pretty cool.
a /signed
this way you do not need all 3 campaigns to get the title.
poasiods
What I meant by putting People Know Me title as an example is that some titles require more than one campaign to complete. The maxed title - the later ranks which require over 25 maxed ranks must have been created with people owning all 3 chapters as well Eye of the North in mind, meaning having another title requiring all campaigns might not be all that preposterous.
I suppose my main point was that by forcing people to complete all the missions without dying, it would put some meaning into the actual title consisting of more than hitting level 10 and farming Kilroy endlessly. It'd at least demonstrate that whoever has the title is capable of beating all the missions without dying, which would require more precision and skill than farming. Then again, I'm weighing alot of this under the presumption that Anet is not necessarily fond of people farming, which might not be the case seeing all the opportunities they throw at us with repeatable quests and the titles which basically require the players to farm to certain extent to achieve.
I suppose my main point was that by forcing people to complete all the missions without dying, it would put some meaning into the actual title consisting of more than hitting level 10 and farming Kilroy endlessly. It'd at least demonstrate that whoever has the title is capable of beating all the missions without dying, which would require more precision and skill than farming. Then again, I'm weighing alot of this under the presumption that Anet is not necessarily fond of people farming, which might not be the case seeing all the opportunities they throw at us with repeatable quests and the titles which basically require the players to farm to certain extent to achieve.
O Nuxtofulakas
Survivor title is the only title in the game that many players never had the chance to accomplish with their main char...cause when it was introduced, their main char had died at least once...
This has already been mentioned in the past, but anet doesn't care to solve this and give "old" players a chance to get it even now...
This is the only fix the title needs from my pov....to make things equal...
This has already been mentioned in the past, but anet doesn't care to solve this and give "old" players a chance to get it even now...
This is the only fix the title needs from my pov....to make things equal...
Thierry2
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gift3d
Even IF an idea such as the ones you stated were implemented (except the entirely new title idea), there'd still be the hundreds of talentless title grinders who HFF/kilroy'd their Survivor, so it'd still be the same prestige-less title it is now. Survivor's basically just an extra really easy title to have towards KoaBD now.
|
QFT.
/not signed
Mystica
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dervish Kid
I agree...If your going to complain then dont get it. And when you said you need all 3 campaigns + Eye of The North to get the "People Know Me" title, you wrong. Just with factions alone you can get it. Here's an example:
1.Rank 12 Lux 2.Rank 12 Kurz 3.Rank 12 Legendary Champion 4.Rank 2 Life of The Party 5.Rank 7 Source of Wisdom 6.Rank 6 Blessed by Fate 7.Rank 7 Cursed By Fate 8.Rank 15 Legendary Hero 9.Rank 12 For Gamer 10.Rank 12 Legendary Gladiator |
And @ OP:
How many titles are left that are really hard to aquire? Protector, Guardian, Vanquisher etc etc can be run. Look at the services section. Enough ppl willing to kill every single monster out there for you. Getting survivor per FFF is buyable too and you picked the "cheap" way to get survivor to complain? Even if is only the Kilroy boxing...you have to do it yourself.
It's up to your personal preference how you want to get your titles. In the end...nobody will care. I find it even more impressive that people come up with foolproof ways to make the titles easier. Whoever found that one out...kudos. Nothing wrong with people trying to achieve things as effective as possible but if you want to spend your time getting the title by doing every quest and mission out there, have fun. We won't stop you.
I got my first legendary survior by doing quests and missions and I am not bragging about it. In fact it saddens me that I wasted so many days.
It's just like 55 farming. Anet never intended to farm or use a monk that way but it happened and it is just as "cheap" als Kilroy surviving. Does it mean you use the Fianna Boon healer or DW healer templates from 2005 + hench or pug to farm cause it is more a ong the lines of Anets intentions on monking (and yes this is a PvP template bla...just an example to show my point)?
Seriously get over it. People are sick of this topic. If you want it the hard way, do it. I repeat: Nobody will care how you got your title. You won't be a "Legendary Superhero" or "Kind of a Bigger Deal".
phan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gift3d
talentless title grinders
|
Loviatar
use the search 5 pages half are whines to let me do it over.
MODS PLEASE CLOSE/COMBINE this one as well
samples from only first page
Showing results 1 to 25 of 117
Search took 0.28 seconds; generated 3 minute(s) ago. Search: Key Word(s): change survivor title
Thread / Thread Starter Last Post Replies Views Forum
Changing the Requirements for Survivor Title
poasiods Today 09:53 AM
by phan 26 437 Sardelac Sanitarium
Legendary Survivor - the safe, easy and quick way to XP farm the title ( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
by zling 401 73,940 Community Works
Survivor Title should be available to ALL Characters!
by Griff Mon 5 318 Questions & Answers
Change to Survivor
Daisuko 04-11-2008 07:15 PM
by cgruber 11 683 Mesmer
Poll: Possible Solution to the Survivor squabble ( 1 2 3)
Shadowmoon 03-07-2008 05:37 AM
by Steps_Descending 24 440 Sardelac Sanitarium
GW please change the survivor title!! Please sign if u agree with suggestion ( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
by street peddler 116 2,092 The Riverside Inn
Survivor title for old characters ( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
StelardActek 01-23-2008 11:59 AM
by MithranArkanere 399 6,927 Sardelac Sanitarium
Erasing Survivor from Title List...
Blu 01-23-2008 10:55 AM
by Isileth 12 229 Sardelac Sanitarium
When you lose survivor... ( 1 2 3)
Tyla 01-06-2008 12:32 PM
by Daf 82 2,001 The Riverside Inn
Legendary Defender and Survivor for older characters ( 1 2)
wetsparks 01-06-2008 08:53 AM
Journey to the North buff and the need for change Survivor
Shadowmoon
MODS PLEASE CLOSE/COMBINE this one as well
samples from only first page
Showing results 1 to 25 of 117
Search took 0.28 seconds; generated 3 minute(s) ago. Search: Key Word(s): change survivor title
Thread / Thread Starter Last Post Replies Views Forum
Changing the Requirements for Survivor Title
poasiods Today 09:53 AM
by phan 26 437 Sardelac Sanitarium
Legendary Survivor - the safe, easy and quick way to XP farm the title ( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
by zling 401 73,940 Community Works
Survivor Title should be available to ALL Characters!
by Griff Mon 5 318 Questions & Answers
Change to Survivor
Daisuko 04-11-2008 07:15 PM
by cgruber 11 683 Mesmer
Poll: Possible Solution to the Survivor squabble ( 1 2 3)
Shadowmoon 03-07-2008 05:37 AM
by Steps_Descending 24 440 Sardelac Sanitarium
GW please change the survivor title!! Please sign if u agree with suggestion ( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
by street peddler 116 2,092 The Riverside Inn
Survivor title for old characters ( 1 2 3 ... Last Page)
StelardActek 01-23-2008 11:59 AM
by MithranArkanere 399 6,927 Sardelac Sanitarium
Erasing Survivor from Title List...
Blu 01-23-2008 10:55 AM
by Isileth 12 229 Sardelac Sanitarium
When you lose survivor... ( 1 2 3)
Tyla 01-06-2008 12:32 PM
by Daf 82 2,001 The Riverside Inn
Legendary Defender and Survivor for older characters ( 1 2)
wetsparks 01-06-2008 08:53 AM
Journey to the North buff and the need for change Survivor
Shadowmoon
MasterSasori
It would just be easier if Survivor gets X amount of exp.
The End.
The End.
yum
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dervish Kid
3.Rank 12 Legendary Champion 8.Rank 15 Legendary Hero 10.Rank 12 Legendary Gladiator |
wilderness
I like the suggestion: Gaining the title in this way would be a lot more impressive than the current format.
vixro
I still think it would be nice for some people who have died to be able to achieve the survivor title. Such as 5mil exp without dying again. I'm going to be stuck trying to get God Amongst Mere Mortals without survivor or legendary defender of ascalon. I'm pretty much forced to grind chests and ID's both.
Kavadas
I personally think that the survivor title should be earned by completing whole primary quest chains per campaign. So if you make it all way through the a campaign's primary quest chain you get it. Each additional campaign primary quest chain adds another level to the rank.
That's an achievement...
That's an achievement...
princess jessie
i would like to see it possible to get survivor on any character. my character already had many deaths before they came out with survivor. why can't i start from where i am now and try for it, since i'm level 20 maybe they could raise the reqs or something, to make if fair.
Arduin
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by poasiods
Does no one else see anything wrong with the title then?
|
Guess I'll max Kurzick for my GWAMM then.
Lykan
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by poasiods
I'm sure everyone knows how little effort it takes now days to earn Legendary Survivor title, especially with necros running around and getting it within 10 hours or so.
|
Hermos
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by poasiods
No, because you aren't giving a reason why it should stay the same and simply copying and pasting the same sentence with increasing capitalization, which must've taken some creative and effort to pull off
|
2. If people don't like the survivor title and it's farmability, then they need to nerf farming altogether. Go and qq about how farming has ruined the economy. gogogogoplz. I'd like to see ANET do anything about that.
3. Once again, it's all about change, and how the community adapts to it... not how the community tries to make it. I see ANET as a huge "super team of deities" (as the Simpsons puts it) looking at the community as a whole rather than individually. They do what's best for themselves, their wage slips, and whatever they can to keep GW running. They're not going to change an aspect of GW for a minority (yes, minority) of people who continue to think of the morals and ethical issues of a flipping video game. The number of people who'd gladly farm the title completely outweighs the number that think it's "morally wrong" or "cheating".
So, please, deal with it. Or go play another game. Because the qq'ing is so freaking unbearable, it's like the time ANET improved monster AI, and people were like, "OMG WTF I CANT SIT AND PRESS 12345 AND GET LOADZ OF GOLD AND MAKE MY CHAR AMAZIN PLZZZZZZ I WANNA QQ".
poasiods
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kavadas
I personally think that the survivor title should be earned by completing whole primary quest chains per campaign. So if you make it all way through the a campaign's primary quest chain you get it. Each additional campaign primary quest chain adds another level to the rank.
That's an achievement... |
spent simply trying to max out another title. In fact, I'd like it better if alot of titles in the game were more oriented towards players' playing style. If Survivor was achievable through completing all the primary quests and missions, it'd be something more natural to come by rather than being another grinding fest. It'd probably boost the number of people found in mission posts too.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lykan
Did i miss something, whats so special about necros?
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Hermos
1. If people do not like that the survivor title can be farmed, then they should simply shun the title altogether and see it not as a form of achievement, but as another crappy title that noobs wear, such as the r6 lightbringer title that the community has completely shunned... or the protector titles.
2. If people don't like the survivor title and it's farmability, then they need to nerf farming altogether. Go and qq about how farming has ruined the economy. gogogogoplz. I'd like to see ANET do anything about that. 3. Once again, it's all about change, and how the community adapts to it... not how the community tries to make it. I see ANET as a huge "super team of deities" (as the Simpsons puts it) looking at the community as a whole rather than individually. They do what's best for themselves, their wage slips, and whatever they can to keep GW running. They're not going to change an aspect of GW for a minority (yes, minority) of people who continue to think of the morals and ethical issues of a flipping video game. The number of people who'd gladly farm the title completely outweighs the number that think it's "morally wrong" or "cheating". So, please, deal with it. Or go play another game. Because the qq'ing is so freaking unbearable, it's like the time ANET improved monster AI, and people were like, "OMG WTF I CANT SIT AND PRESS 12345 AND GET LOADZ OF GOLD AND MAKE MY CHAR AMAZIN PLZZZZZZ I WANNA QQ". |
Luminarus
The only change survivor needs, is a way to reset the title so that you can go for r3 if you didnt know about the title when u made you're character. IMO, it should be gain 1337500xp without dying, not with 0 deaths on that character.
hippo942
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ancient Menace
Everyone stop trying to change the survivor title. If you don't like the way it is, don't get it.
Stop trying to change the survivor title. STOP trying to change the survivor title. STOP TRYING to change the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO change the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE the survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE survivor title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR title. STOP TRYING TO CHANGE THE SURVIVOR TITLE! Clear enough? |