Yet another thread that's been suggested a bazillion times, but I do see the point. You get titles for finishing missions, why not quests?
The problem is a lot of people don't do the quests unless they're primary, or the master difficulty ones keep some like myself from doing them because they're so irritating.
But then again, if you finish every single quest in the game, that takes probably more time and devotion than all the missions, so why not a title? Or perhaps at least one for all master difficulty missions or something.
Questing title! PLEASE
Tender Wolf
Akolo
right now, nonprimary quests are a waste of time (except those who give pve skills in eotn).
this title would give a reason to do the quests.
/signed.
this title would give a reason to do the quests.
/signed.
Rockby Quickfoot
Well, I've got three characters and I do all the quests all the time as I go through. Side quests, primary quests, everything. My Mesmer has actually already done all the quests in the game, while my other two aren't far enough because I don't play them near often enough.
I'd love for a title for reading and enjoying some of the nice side plots that Guild Wars has, and really think it'd be a nice way to get people more interested in them so maybe the Developer's hard work on them didn't go to complete waste and a bit more interest can be generated in them.
Why people don't do them already is beyond me, as I don't see the point in passing up free gold and experience for a reward, but whatever. I'm thinking it'd be a neat idea to give a title for it so that more people may do the quests and possibly even enjoy them a bit for the unique situations they face the player with that can't be found in everyday explorable areas and missions.
Definitely signed.
I'd love for a title for reading and enjoying some of the nice side plots that Guild Wars has, and really think it'd be a nice way to get people more interested in them so maybe the Developer's hard work on them didn't go to complete waste and a bit more interest can be generated in them.
Why people don't do them already is beyond me, as I don't see the point in passing up free gold and experience for a reward, but whatever. I'm thinking it'd be a neat idea to give a title for it so that more people may do the quests and possibly even enjoy them a bit for the unique situations they face the player with that can't be found in everyday explorable areas and missions.
Definitely signed.
MithranArkanere
Titles were meant to be something given to those that make things:
I like to explore, I explored, I get the Carthographer.
I like to make all missions, I get the Protector.
I like to kill everything in one area, I get Vanquisher.
I like to get all skills in one character, I get Skill hunter.
So, what about those that like to make all quests? Adventurer!
This title existing or not don't keep me from making all quests, I'll make them all anyways, but there are much senseless things getting titles for being done, like staying in an outposts checking the Drunkard line in the Titles list until the next number comes.
The sooner it's added, the better.
I like to explore, I explored, I get the Carthographer.
I like to make all missions, I get the Protector.
I like to kill everything in one area, I get Vanquisher.
I like to get all skills in one character, I get Skill hunter.
So, what about those that like to make all quests? Adventurer!
This title existing or not don't keep me from making all quests, I'll make them all anyways, but there are much senseless things getting titles for being done, like staying in an outposts checking the Drunkard line in the Titles list until the next number comes.
The sooner it's added, the better.
fireflyry
/signed
A title I would actually enjoy like Protectors.
A title I would actually enjoy like Protectors.
seut
As much as i would like to see the implementation of such a title, it might interfere with the Linsey Murdock's plans to add new stuff to the game on a monthly basis starting next month -> http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:...urdock/Journal
I hope for one or two new quests per month.
I hope for one or two new quests per month.
Teh [prefession]-zorz
/Not signed
Have enough titles imo.
Have enough titles imo.
MithranArkanere
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by seut
As much as i would like to see the implementation of such a title, it might interfere with the Linsey Murdock's plans to add new stuff to the game on a monthly basis starting next month -> http://wiki.guildwars.com/wiki/User:...urdock/Journal
I hope for one or two new quests per month. |
When terrain was added(Grent's Footprint) or lost(Prophecies Arenas), you kept the exploration.
So, this would be the same, if new quests are added, they count for the max, but won't remove your max if you already got it.
Konig Des Todes
Although I /signed while this was a new thread. /sign again. This is the only new title that's really needed (maybe along with MithranArkanere's suggestion for reformatting titles on page two).
Adding a poll to this, or the original thread and merging the two, would be good.
Adding a poll to this, or the original thread and merging the two, would be good.
imnotyourmother
sounds good. Anything to get my RP sooner. TITles WOOT
Tender Wolf
I know I already signed this but I do have a question - my fiance brought up a good point. Now while it would be a good idea to add this, how will you know for sure if you've done every single quest in the game? Now I don't mean the ones in your log are cleared out, like what if you missed an NPC that has a quest or something? Hope that makes sense. 
Oh, and what about the Margrid/MOW quests? If you go with one of those heroes you don't get the quests for the other. How would that work? Unless the ones at the end of the game would count.
Oh, and what about the Margrid/MOW quests? If you go with one of those heroes you don't get the quests for the other. How would that work? Unless the ones at the end of the game would count.
Konig Des Todes
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Tender Wolf
how will you know for sure if you've done every single quest in the game?
|
Quote:
| Oh, and what about the Margrid/MOW quests? If you go with one of those heroes you don't get the quests for the other. How would that work? Unless the ones at the end of the game would count. |
As for the "Campaign A only characters" quests, basically three different forms of each title track would be needed. Those quest tracks are based off of which campaign your character is from. So Prophecies characters have to do more quests in Prophecies then Factions characters, and so on and so on. Also, Pre-Searing quests, and other limited time quests (Event Quests for instance) would NOT count to the title. Repeating quests only count ONCE.
I hope that helps you out Tender Wolf
.
Monkey Slayer
/signed
This title would be huge considering there are so many quests.
This title would be huge considering there are so many quests.
Tender Wolf
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Azazel The Assassin
I hope that helps you out Tender Wolf . |
Thanks!But yes I wouldn't mind a questing title, but at the same time I can see why ANET wouldn't implement it. So I'm okay either way really.
pumpkin pie
hrmz, after reading this thread, lol, am i the only one who complete all primary and side quests along with the story?? Is there anyone out there that is doing the quests at all?
MithranArkanere
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pumpkin pie
hrmz, after reading this thread, lol, am i the only one who complete all primary and side quests along with the story?? Is there anyone out there that is doing the quests at all?
|
But all that are available right now, I've made them.
So yes, people do quests.
That deserves a title.
aotdsyndrome
/signed. People nowadays only want to farm DoA or solo uw, scrawl dungeons, etc. Noone takes time to follow the numerous little sidequests that always add some punch to the game.
Tyla
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pumpkin pie
hrmz, after reading this thread, lol, am i the only one who complete all primary and side quests along with the story?? Is there anyone out there that is doing the quests at all?
|
Sweet Mystery
I had a habit of clearing quests from my main characters on my 2 accounts... then gave up as too much hassle... I have 27 titles, well on my way to get the 30 I need..... adding this while it might seem like fun will just be a real GRIND if moving along.... and then to see the sheer hell of things... and the number of quests.... eeek.
This article (http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10285297) had a speadsheet someone did to collate the quests to check them off... the number of them is staggering....
Just think.... Adventurer Quest Log 234/322234 Complete.... *sigh* (arbitary numbers chosen...)
Think too much to code to recognise the questing, too much in the end when see just where you are... no idea what quests missed or where.... at least get symbols for vanquish and dungeons etc....
Nice idea but too much for GW I think... perhaps something to look at for GW2
This article (http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s...php?t=10285297) had a speadsheet someone did to collate the quests to check them off... the number of them is staggering....
Just think.... Adventurer Quest Log 234/322234 Complete.... *sigh* (arbitary numbers chosen...)
Think too much to code to recognise the questing, too much in the end when see just where you are... no idea what quests missed or where.... at least get symbols for vanquish and dungeons etc....
Nice idea but too much for GW I think... perhaps something to look at for GW2
jazilla
great idea and would fit in handsomely with the Vanq./Cart./Skill titles. Games are for playing, titles are for earning. I like this business you speak of.
/signed
/signed
Hyper.nl
/signed
This is a title that makes sense. Make sure it works retroactive for quests already completed by existing characters tho.
This is a title that makes sense. Make sure it works retroactive for quests already completed by existing characters tho.
Horus
this would be much better than those pay-to-have booze/etc. titles. You actually have to do something for this one.
/signed
/signed
pumpkin pie
/signed since i have 90% of the quests completed.
but I have one question. Don't you think this title should only be given to players who complete quests as the story progress?
it would be rather easy if some grind up to legendary survivor, then come back and do all the quests?
but I have one question. Don't you think this title should only be given to players who complete quests as the story progress?
it would be rather easy if some grind up to legendary survivor, then come back and do all the quests?
Arduin
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pumpkin pie
but I have one question. Don't you think this title should only be given to players who complete quests as the story progress?
it would be rather easy if some grind up to legendary survivor, then come back and do all the quests? |
Half of the quests are in level 20 areas anyway.
pamelf
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pumpkin pie
but I have one question. Don't you think this title should only be given to players who complete quests as the story progress? |
Besides, the quests that aren't primary have absolutely nothing to do with the storyline..how would you suggest they police that?
There would be absolutely no benifit in having a necessary progression other than making it frustrating. What happens if you miss one along the way, would it be like survivor where once missed you never have the opportunity to do it, therefore missing out completely? I really think completing the huge number of quests in each campaign would be difficult enough without the added worry of where the quest fits in chronologically.
romeus petrus
Although I understand your point that this kind of title would prolly mean more than a lot of other existing titles that dont mean squad. I cant help but /notsign due to my eternal hatred of title grinding.
MithranArkanere
Nah, nah.
Order is irrelevant. What's important is to make them.
- Campaign-exclusive quests should NOT be counted, since not all characters can make them. That makes things easier, and solves problems about people leaving pre-Searing before making all quests.
- Travel quests should not be counted, since they are not 'optional', people must them to get to other campaigns, and they are just 3 per character.
- Repeatable quests should be counted once (like all primary and dungeon EotN quests and all missions ALREADY are)
- When two quest lines are mutually-exclusive, and one of the lines has more quests than the other, the last quests one of the shorter quest line will count as more than one quest to make them match.
Of course, players would have to repeat some repeatable quests that were not counted before, but that's not a problem.
Order is irrelevant. What's important is to make them.
- Campaign-exclusive quests should NOT be counted, since not all characters can make them. That makes things easier, and solves problems about people leaving pre-Searing before making all quests.
- Travel quests should not be counted, since they are not 'optional', people must them to get to other campaigns, and they are just 3 per character.
- Repeatable quests should be counted once (like all primary and dungeon EotN quests and all missions ALREADY are)
- When two quest lines are mutually-exclusive, and one of the lines has more quests than the other, the last quests one of the shorter quest line will count as more than one quest to make them match.
Of course, players would have to repeat some repeatable quests that were not counted before, but that's not a problem.
pamelf
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by MithranArkanere
Nah, nah.
Order is irrelevant. What's important is to make them. - Campaign-exclusive quests should NOT be counted, since not all characters can make them. That makes things easier, and solves problems about people leaving pre-Searing before making all quests. - Travel quests should not be counted, since they are not 'optional', people must them to get to other campaigns, and they are just 3 per character. - Repeatable quests should be counted once (like all primary and dungeon EotN quests and all missions ALREADY are) - When two quest lines are mutually-exclusive, and one of the lines has more quests than the other, the last quests one of the shorter quest line will count as more than one quest to make them match. Of course, players would have to repeat some repeatable quests that were not counted before, but that's not a problem. |
Surely each continent would have its own questing title?
Shyft the Pyro
I don't want a quest title to tell me when I'm done questing. I want a quest log for completed quests to show me I've done everything I could have.
Elder III
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by untouchable
I think they should put in a title for quests. Completeing all quests in a game=title. I think its stupid that they havn't done this considering they did it for missions. And in my opinion is would definatly make questing more enjoyable because its going towards a title. Good idea!?
|
/SIGNED 2x
ahem.
/Signed
It'd be the funniest title in game.
It'd be the funniest title in game.
MithranArkanere
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by pamelf
I agree with everything you said except for the campaign exclusive quest thing...bit confused by that as surely all quests are campaign exclusive as they can only be done in that campaign and not any other?
Surely each continent would have its own questing title? |
For example, in Shing Jea, ALL but The Bog Beast of Bokku are native-exclusive.
If Prophecies, all up to Kryta: Journey end are exclusive to native characters.
Those won't count for the title, since it would be like giving points for Vanquishing pre-Searing areas: foreigners can't make them, even when they have their own 'exclusive ones'.
But all the rest, all the ones all characters can make regardless of the campaign they are from, would be counted.
bttgw
/sign sign sign
I have been waiting for this quest title series
Master Tyria Adventurer
Master Canthan Adventurer
Master Elona Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
I have been waiting for this quest title series
Master Tyria Adventurer
Master Canthan Adventurer
Master Elona Adventurer
Legendary Adventurer
NINjA
/sign
I really waiting for that Title
I really waiting for that Title
dragonx1013
/Signed
One great reason, its a title that can not be farmed, and does not (necessarily) involve repetitious actions to complete. I'm all game to be a LB Rank 10, however, I got tired of the Junundra Farming after the second time. I have the game to PLAY, not repeat the same area a million times so I have a higher rank.
One great reason, its a title that can not be farmed, and does not (necessarily) involve repetitious actions to complete. I'm all game to be a LB Rank 10, however, I got tired of the Junundra Farming after the second time. I have the game to PLAY, not repeat the same area a million times so I have a higher rank.
Vann Borakul
Having 3-4 titles for this would be horrendous. It would drastically cheapen GWAMM. All quests need to count for 1 title. It's not like you need to do them in HM.
/signed
/signed
MithranArkanere
With this title and a 'master of' for each region, it would be possible to get almost 30 titles WITHOUT grind at all.
I say... poll this thread!
I say... poll this thread!
deadman_uk
As a person who owns 5 characters and has an obession of completing all quests I see, in all 4 campaigns, I very much welcome this suggestion!!!
/signed 100%
/signed 100%
A11Eur0
Dunno if I've posted in this thread but I see no downside to this suggestion. it's one of the few titles if it were a title that would actually mean something. I mean, you have a title for how many drinks/sweets/party items you consume, you ahve a title for missions completed, areas vanquished, % of the map uncovered...why not for quests too? It makes sense.Makes more sense than the consumable titles anyway, just farm farm farm buy buy buy brag brag brag. This way it encourages people to actually play the game through instead of running to the key outposts and farming the rest of it.
RotteN
/signed
some quests are actually pretty funny to do, but most people ignore them cause, well, they don't realy give you anything decent.
some quests are actually pretty funny to do, but most people ignore them cause, well, they don't realy give you anything decent.