[Merged from another thread]
The heated controversy relating to the perma-Shadow Form build has caused lots of flaming and spamming and people arguing that perma-Shadow is destroying the economy. And because of that reason, most people want Shadow Form to be nerfed. However, doing so will not only cause making Shadow Form being useless, but invoking an angry protest from most Assassins. This is because is buff has been around for a few weeks, and nerfing it again is like giving candy to a baby and then taking it away. I'm not good at persuasion, but I will try to make valid arguments to change your mind.
Here are the few good reasons why Shadow Form should be the way it is:
1) It is not 100% invulernable
As I said before, Shadow Form is NOT 100% invincible. The enchantment cannot protect you from touch skills, signets, traps, and non-targeting AoE spells (particularly ones that are point blank). In fact, there is enough behemoths in the mountain path in the UW that is capable of killing you in one shot.
2) Nerfing Shadow Form WILL effect the ecto prices
Currently, ectos are around 4k ea. Apparently, this is good because it gives more incentive for people to buy because it's cheaper. Economics 101. Cheaper is always better, since people can save more and use the money to buy things. This keeps the economy running. Nerfing Shadow Form will make obtaining ectos even more difficult and such, it will raise the ecto prices and cause people to have less incentive to buy. And because of that, sellers will end up having lots of ectos unable to sell. Besides which, ectos are used to trade for everlasting tonics (which by average, if I'm not mistaken, is around 100-150 ectos) and obsidian armor (which I know lots of people want for the Hall of Monuments).
3) Nerfing Shadow Form will destroy oppurtunities.
Nerfing shadow form will destroy personal oppurtunities to get an items. Noticeably, rare miniatures, everlasting tonics, and obsidian armor (I myself, want the everlasting automatonic and the everlasting beetle juice). As well as oppurtunities to buy a lot of consumables for titles like Drunkard, Sweet Tooth, and Party Animal. Even people want those Powerstones to complete vanquishing or filling the hero handbooks for EotN reputation points. Nerfing Shadow Form will ruin the oppurtunity to farm want people wish to pursue. When Shadow Form was buffed, I farm in the UW not just because of the everlasting tonics, but to try something I really wanted to do (and some other people as well), which is farming UW in solo.
4) Other farming build smay not be effective on certain areas than the perma-shadow (particularly the UW)
For this one, people say there are other solo builds that can farm in the UW. Although they may do so, it isn't really effective because the build may lack one or two things:
1) Enchantment Removal
2) Interrupts
3) Negating damage (particularly the Bladed Aaxte)
For example, a 55 Monk build may have the ability to deal with enchantment removal due to Spell Breaker, but the build may not able to handle interrupts caused by Bladed Aaxte and Grasping Darknesses. perma-Shadow Form, on the other hand, is the only one that can handle all of these at once.
Some argue, that farming things in duo is better than farming in solo. However, it is a complete opposite. One, in order for this to be effective, you must do it with someone you know or someone you trust. Second, because loot is being shared, there be even situation where there are perpetual arguments and disagreements. For example, if one player gets 14 ectos while the other players gets 2 in one run, then there will instances of arguments or rage-quiting where the one who gets the least number of ectos leave out of anger. Normally, this situation can be handle with the 50/50 solution, but it isn't always that way because one may be doing the tanking while the other will do the damage. As such, doing things in a duo will get things less done due to disagreements. Perma-shadow, on the other hand, only requires yourself and can clear things in the UW easily (malus the charged blacknesses and the behemoths of course). And such, perma-shadow is not only easier, but you don't have to argue with anyone because you'll get all the loot anyways.
5) Nerfing Shadow Form will incite a massive protest
As with all nerfs, nerfing permashadow will incite protest from other people. In this case, this will anger a lot of assassins and perma-shadow farmers. Remember, the loot scaling? It caused a lot of people to angrily protest the scaling. And remember the Spirit Bond nerf (Spirit Bond once heal you when dealing over 60 damage with no limits), this angered a lot of 600 monks because of that. Although not everyone will disagree with the nerf, I believe most farmers nowadays are assassins and 55 monk is considered to be obsolete.
6) Finally, perma-shadow is the only build that can EASILY handle bosses (well, there are other builds, but perma-shadow can handle it EASILY).
That's true, because of the resistance to attacks and spells (most may have enchantment removal or interrupts), Permashadow can handle bosses way better than any other builds (which most bosses drop some sort of a "green" weapon). Although green weapons are pretty much worthless and hard to sell nowadays, some may choose to equip their heroes with a green weapon because one won't have to go through all the trouble to get the mods needed for the hero to use. Also, in HM, bosses drop elite tomes, which some may want to give an elite skill to their new characters to make life easier. As such, perma-shadow will effect how things will play around when it comes to getting skills and managing hero equipment. So what are going to equip your warrior hero with when Shadow Form is nerfed, a non-perfect Divine Favor staff?
Now, before you guys post and such, I want everyone to be respectful, and don't go to the extent of calling someone a vulgar language. Otherwise, I will simply report you.
Anyways, discuss your opinions relating to my argument and I will allow opposition and criticisms. Just that I will try to make counter arguments to counter your point.