Will Anet's Handling Of GW1 Dissuade You From GW2?
qvtkc
The actual handling of GW won't affect my purchase of GW2 for or against it. But the focus on grind might. GW1 was great when I got it (Christmas 2005) with basically zero grind. Now it's very different from that, still a good game though. But if this trend keeps going into GW2 I don't know if I'll buy it.
Clobimon
I really can't understand how or why you're expecting ANet to move into a development & support phase equivalent to the current state after release of GW2. I'm sorry, but that's just rediculous. You're comparing support of a game that's "on the last leg of it's lifecycle," as stated by the comm. rep, during the development of their entirely new game to the support of their new game while improving and adding to said new game. They're not going to release GW2 and say, "alright, we did it!" and start creating another entirely new game. Every expansion/addition and change subsequent to release is going to effect the entire game, which means everyone at ANet is working on improving the game we're playing. This is no different than any other company out there. Now, if you're expecting the original Guild Wars to be receiving regular updates and new content (still) post-GW2... that's dreaming. They'll "leave the servers up as long as people are playing it" but to expect anything more...
mcsumo
Quote:
Am I not entitled to post my own opinions even though I disagree with you. And by the way, your opinion is not shared by everyone either.
Which is why they still have a small number of staff maintaining the current game, which I repeat, most players seem to be satisfied with. It is really dumb optimistic fanboy-ism to think that GW2 would bring us back to Prophecies level of support that we enjoyed 4.5 years ago or better. And yes, they will divide resources based on the most recent level of support which most users are satisifed with. |
Yes we do.
The last content we had to pay for was EotN, released over 2 years ago. For the same amount of money I could buy all the GW campaigns + EotN or 1 Xbox 360 game. I am still playing GW after 3.5 years, a console game lasts 6 months at a very big push. We do get new quests with each halloween and wintersday, we get new weapon skins, a redesign of the UW it seems. The Zaishen menagerie and equipment bags to carry more have also been added and Zaishen quests breathing new life into many areas. Plus storage panes and makeovers people can pay for if they want. All this with no cost. Damn right I am happy with the support we are getting now and in my view anyone who isn't is an ingrate.
That still doesn't mean we will have the same level of support for a brand new and completely different game. If you have any new evidence to support your view, then please let us know, rather than just shouting the same thing louder and louder. (Which is effectively what you are doing.)
Daesu
Quote:
All this with no cost. Damn right I am happy with the support we are getting now and in my view anyone who isn't is an ingrate.
|
Quote:
That still doesn't mean we will have the same level of support for a brand new and completely different game. If you have any new evidence to support your view, then please let us know, rather than just shouting the same thing louder and louder. (Which is effectively what you are doing.) |
Even if your guess is right, that GW2.1 is alot easier to develop, that does not imply that ANet would allocate LESS resources into GW2.1 development than they did for GW2. Why? Because there is no reason why having GW2.1 ready to market SOONER is a bad thing and the more resources that I have for GW2.1 development, the SOONER it would be ready. Noticing how they allocate their priority, right now, between the current release and the next release is more important than saying GW2.1 needs more or less resources to develop.
I only take the most recent level of support as an example.
Their level of support for the current game would not change, even after GW2 is released!
Nereyda Shoaal
Quote:
No idea why. I simply check the pings, they don't lie. Ever. Especially with the low 50-90ms. Even English servers have 2 or 3 times higher ping.
|
I can also check with my friends based in Poland if you wish so. But I'm pretty sure none of them had any issues with the network
Benderama
1.i think Anet has handled the game well. i may not have been here since the beginning but for the last yeazr it's been fine for me. most of the problems are kinda community driven (not saying its your fault) but we're always criticising everything rather than looking at whats been/being done.
2. buy GW2, not really because of the gameplay of guild wars, i'd buy it for the best online community ever! and also the story.
2. buy GW2, not really because of the gameplay of guild wars, i'd buy it for the best online community ever! and also the story.
Abedeus
Quote:
Checked again. So called "Kamadan English - Polish - District 1" is based in Texas. Unless NCSoft are "lying" with the IP addresses
I can also check with my friends based in Poland if you wish so. But I'm pretty sure none of them had any issues with the network |
I wasn't saying GW has lags all the time. But when there are lags, A.Net will just say "Oh, really? Okay then, sorry." and ignore the issue, because we don't pay them anymore. Usually their servers are quite lag-free and I was talking about the lack of support in case of abnormal lags.
Remember when they blamed high pings (100k+) on the heat wave two years ago or so?
Nereyda Shoaal
XXXX (19:48)
no nie da rady
XXXX (19:48)
no ale jak ma ping 800 to definitywnie ma cos z providerem ..
na 100% ma cos zrabane
XXXX (19:51)
albo ma zawalony system jakimis downloaderami, trojanami etc, albo ma kijowego providera, albo ma 8975823652835 osob w sieci z non stop torrentem, albo cos innego podobnego
Had a quick word with one of the fellas. Others don't get anything like this either, and I never heard them complaining
Yes I remember lag spikes but never had anything like 800, omg
/edit
And only because GW lags why everyone presumes it's their fault? They don't own any internet infrastructure do they? Few routers go bust (lets say) in NY and there you go... reason for the ping to go up
no nie da rady
XXXX (19:48)
no ale jak ma ping 800 to definitywnie ma cos z providerem ..
na 100% ma cos zrabane
XXXX (19:51)
albo ma zawalony system jakimis downloaderami, trojanami etc, albo ma kijowego providera, albo ma 8975823652835 osob w sieci z non stop torrentem, albo cos innego podobnego
Had a quick word with one of the fellas. Others don't get anything like this either, and I never heard them complaining
Yes I remember lag spikes but never had anything like 800, omg
/edit
And only because GW lags why everyone presumes it's their fault? They don't own any internet infrastructure do they? Few routers go bust (lets say) in NY and there you go... reason for the ping to go up
Abedeus
Well, I have several screenshots with nice pings. I never deleted a single screenshot so it was hard to find some with a really high ping in less than 10 minutes, but I have on right here with last ping 20k, average ping 11,7k. English district. And another, with last ping 13,5k, average over 1,6k. I know that torrents/downloads affect the latency and I'm not stupid to complain because of that.
But when you get such pings on a clean machine where every game on normal servers works fine...
Not to mention some folks on this very forum posted pings of 200k+. Probably those threads are long gone, but it's not easy to remember such thing.
But when you get such pings on a clean machine where every game on normal servers works fine...
Not to mention some folks on this very forum posted pings of 200k+. Probably those threads are long gone, but it's not easy to remember such thing.
Shy Guy
This is stupid really.
Maybe ANet hasn't handled gw1 as well as I had hoped, but gw2 is completely different and in no way will be affected by the handling of gw1 as of now seeing they're putting so much time into gw2.
Maybe ANet hasn't handled gw1 as well as I had hoped, but gw2 is completely different and in no way will be affected by the handling of gw1 as of now seeing they're putting so much time into gw2.
vdz
Not at all.
I hope they`ve learned from their mistakes in GW. Overall GW has been an amazing experience. Yes they mucked up here and there, but dont we all?
I'm seriously thrilled to start playing GW 2, need some serious patience though.
I hope they`ve learned from their mistakes in GW. Overall GW has been an amazing experience. Yes they mucked up here and there, but dont we all?
I'm seriously thrilled to start playing GW 2, need some serious patience though.
Atrenim
I honestly cannot complain about Guild Wars. I left for a few months to "try out the rest" and after a lot of disappointment I can sincerely say Guild Wars is among one of the best. Some people will hate it, some will love, in the end I'm just happy I enjoy it.
DreamWind
One of the things that amazes me is how many people are saying:
"I completely disagree with how Anet has handled/managed GW1, BUT...I am going to happily support them and buy GW2".
Amazes me really.
"I completely disagree with how Anet has handled/managed GW1, BUT...I am going to happily support them and buy GW2".
Amazes me really.
HawkofStorms
Why? It's not like I'm supporting euthanasia or something. I'm supporting a video game company. It shouldn't be taken seriously. Giving them money isn't sinful.
Abedeus
Quote:
Why? It's not like I'm supporting euthanasia or something. I'm supporting a video game company. It shouldn't be taken seriously. Giving them money isn't sinful.
|
"Euthanasia is bad because 1), 2), but I will vote for it."
It's a contradiction. Especially in the gaming business, if you don't like something, you vote with your wallet. You don't buy 5 copies of a game "just to teach them a lesson".
Gun Pierson
Well, what other games out there are like GW? None, Arenanet has a monopoly in that segment of the market.
leehai1980
I think you all will have to wait for a while after the release of the GW2 then buy it .Cos they might screw the GW2 again ... It seen like they cant learn from mistake . im getting bored after the UW nerf zzzz... Anyway i think they are already starting to screw GW2 up by delay and delay ...
Arduin
Quote:
I think you all will have to wait for a while after the release of the GW2 then buy it .Cos they might screw the GW2 again ... It seen like they cant learn from mistake . im getting bored after the UW nerf zzzz... Anyway i think they are already starting to screw GW2 up by delay and delay ...
|
You asking me to wait 2 years to see if the game is any better than GW1?
And GW2 has no delay, there never has been a release date. Also, it has only been in development for ~3 years, expect 2 more, 5 years are an average of MMO-building.
Fril Estelin
Quote:
One of the things that amazes me is how many people are saying:
"I completely disagree with how Anet has handled/managed GW1, BUT...I am going to happily support them and buy GW2". Amazes me really. |
Tbh (and without any intention to attack you, let this be clear) you seem to have a "beef" with Anet and take it upon them here in this thread. If you were SO MUCH against them that there's no way you'd consider buying GW2, wouldn't you have moved to greener pastures? If you've been put off so much by their bad handling of GW1, why are you still here on the biggest fansite of the game they sell? Why not move on in your gaming life and let GW to the people that appreciate it? (I'm not saying that your viewpoint is not welcome here, but again it's about being consistent as your message indicates)
I really think as I said before that you have a selective memory. Over the last 4 years Anet sold us 4 no-subscription MMO/CORPG/whatever-you-call-it videogame chapters with very regular updates, community/week-end events and many other changes. We had and still have a vibrant community overall, I mean "overall" (Guru still has a high throughput). There are big regrets but they can only hide the positive aspects if you've been directly hit by most of them (eg high-end PvP, high-end trading, etc.). Overall there's been a lot more positive than negative, even considering how important these negatives were, and that seems to be the overall impression in this thread.
It doesn't remove the validity of your viewpoint in any way, you're entitled to your opinion and no one has the right to dismiss it. But when put in perspective, it may well be a minority opinion. We'll only know when GW2 is on the shelves.
DreamWind
Quote:
As if ANY company would treat the follow up game of its franchise the same way as previous chapters, making the same mistakes and never learning...
|
And its a bit hilarious, because we have a lot of people in this thread who are indicating that they know this, yet they also indicate they will preorder 2 in hopes that things will be different. I think there is a dictionary word to describe these people...insane?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
If you were SO MUCH against them that there's no way you'd consider buying GW2, wouldn't you have moved to greener pastures? If you've been put off so much by their bad handling of GW1, why are you still here on the biggest fansite of the game they sell? Why not move on in your gaming life and let GW to the people that appreciate it?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
I really think as I said before that you have a selective memory. Over the last 4 years Anet sold us 4 no-subscription MMO/CORPG/whatever-you-call-it videogame chapters with very regular updates, community/week-end events and many other changes.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
We had and still have a vibrant community overall, I mean "overall" (Guru still has a high throughput).
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
Overall there's been a lot more positive than negative, even considering how important these negatives were, and that seems to be the overall impression in this thread.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
But when put in perspective, it may well be a minority opinion. We'll only know when GW2 is on the shelves.
|
Daesu
Quote:
One of the things that amazes me is how many people are saying:
"I completely disagree with how Anet has handled/managed GW1, BUT...I am going to happily support them and buy GW2". Amazes me really. |
Despite the fact that they dont need to use a lot of staff members to support the current game, they are is still good enough to keep the revenue stream flowing. At least this seems to be the case for most of the posts on this thread.
Abedeus
Quote:
That means, despite what was being said, ANet has fulfilled their support obligations well enough that people would continue to buy their games and that is the most important goal of providing us supoort in the first place. Maybe ANet's support level is not as good as they have hoped but good enough for them to buy the next game.
Despite the fact that they dont need to use a lot of staff members to support the current game, they are is still good enough to keep the revenue stream flowing. At least this seems to be the case for most of the posts on this thread. |
Fril Estelin
Quote:
TAt least, they certainly haven't shown us anything that should convince us they have learned.
|
Quote:
And its a bit hilarious, because we have a lot of people in this thread who are indicating that they know this, yet they also indicate they will preorder 2 in hopes that things will be different. |
Quote:
I mostly have moved on. |
Quote:
Besides, if this forum was full of only people who appreciated things, it would be a very boring forum. This forum needs people like me to be critical or it would be nothing but a carebear forum. |
Quote:
There are plenty of no-subscription games. I always find is humorous when the only thing good people can come up with about GW is "it has no monthly fee". As for those regular updates and events, I'm not even convinced many of those were good for the game. But such is life. |
Quote:
Tell that to the PvP community. |
Quote:
Because most of the remaining community only remains because they have a more positive impression! Most people who have a negative impression aren't posting here! Makes logical sense right? |
Quote:
It might be. But this thread asked a question, and I answered it. |
I think he's basically saying that your Prophecies box was superseded by your Factions and then NF and then EoTn box.
Abedeus
Wow. So it's even worse. Because it turns out that if you bought Prophecies, after 6 months it's a completely different game. And after another half a year, more changes towards PvE.
Saruuh
i will buy gw2, even if they add some sort of super ninja style "electricshockstroughthemousethatmakesyouinvolunta rilycrapyourpants"
and no, that isnt a space between the a and the r
as a side note, this should be implemented as something that would happen when you broke 10 lockpicks in a row, instantly adding another level to your unlucky title, or lucky title if you swing that way...
and no, that isnt a space between the a and the r
as a side note, this should be implemented as something that would happen when you broke 10 lockpicks in a row, instantly adding another level to your unlucky title, or lucky title if you swing that way...
Fril Estelin
And you knew that. It says somewhere on the box that "online experience may change" IIRC. You can still play Prophecies the way it was as it came out, apart from accumulated balance over the years, except for the PvP part of course. But you know that.
DreamWind
Quote:
They've shown us almost nothing about GW2 apart from lore and general info.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
Most people say they're not bothered by how GW1 was handled, you're looking at what you think is right but it is not, most people are ok and will buy GW2.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
Not from Guru apparently.
There are the people who are critical but still play, and there are people like you. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
This forum would be unbearable if it was full of so-called "critical" people who only come here to point at problems from the past (yes we should remember these things, but not only these ones).
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
Which one compares with GW?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
I'm already doing it.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
And you knew that. It says somewhere on the box that "online experience may change" IIRC. You can still play Prophecies the way it was as it came out, apart from accumulated balance over the years, except for the PvP part of course. But you know that.
|
Fril Estelin
Quote:
Unless another company is making GW2, I fail to see how past behavior isn't going to be the best indicator of future behavior.
|
Quote:
No, most people are saying they had problems with the way GW1 was handled but are instabuying GW2 anyways before they get any information on it after its release. |
Quote:
I make a post or so a day. I log on GW once a week or so. Call it active or not I don't really care much. |
Quote:
Good thing you don't have many of those. You only have the other type of people. |
Quote:
There are plenty of free games that are at least as fun and time consuming as GW. Its just a matter of what you find fun. |
Quote:
Then you would know they have perfect reason to feel pretty bad about Anet or talk like me. |
Quote:
Bold quoted for emphasis. |
EDIT: a comment read on a friend's blog about Dragon Age:Origins explained that GW's AI was so much better than DA:O's. Although very different games, what this showed me is that you tend to forget how spoiled you are in GW1 until you compare it to other games (which is not to say that GW1 is perfect!)
DreamWind
Quote:
They started the GW2 project to go beyond the limit of the GW1 they created, they're certainly not going to make the same mistakes, players would spot these very quickly. This is business common sense.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
I don't really care what you do, I can see you here discussing GW1 and GW2. This is not "moving on".
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
Which is not to say that everyone is like you. As JR explained, many PvPers will try GW2 with the hope that it is what they expected GW1 to be, or even better.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
I never said the contrary, and I've said it many times on Guru.
|
Fril Estelin
Just so we end this (well maybe): you're beyond criticism, you're not yet bashing Anet, but it's not very far. All you do here is explain how you no longer really play the game, yet have so much insight about what is wrong. You remember the wrongs, but not the rights.
I simply cannot, on any level, share your views, because I'm still enjoying GW1 when I can find the time to play it. There are still PvPers playing, albeit clearly not the people whose opinion you respect, and many PvPers ready to give GW2 a chance.
I simply cannot, on any level, share your views, because I'm still enjoying GW1 when I can find the time to play it. There are still PvPers playing, albeit clearly not the people whose opinion you respect, and many PvPers ready to give GW2 a chance.
DreamWind
Quote:
All you do here is explain how you no longer really play the game, yet have so much insight about what is wrong. You remember the wrongs, but not the rights.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fril Estelin
I simply cannot, on any level, share your views, because I'm still enjoying GW1 when I can find the time to play it. There are still PvPers playing, albeit clearly not the people who's opinion you respect, and many PvPers ready to give GW2 a chance.
|
exploiter
Anet's been using GW2 as excuse for why they dont have time to work at GW1. With that, if GW2 is not gonna be perfect in every aspect, im not gonna buy it
HawkofStorms
I invoke the Dreamwind-Fril Law. Any thread that transforms into a quote war between those two has been completely derailed and should be closd.