Add a Costume maker in Pre searing
Aussie Boy
I suggest they add one to Pre it won't give us any armor advantage so I can't see why they shouldn't.
There are so many perma pre toons in pre these days and we did pay money for these items and will do when they add more costumes in the future.
Also add a hat maker while there at it would be nice.
Thoughts?
There are so many perma pre toons in pre these days and we did pay money for these items and will do when they add more costumes in the future.
Also add a hat maker while there at it would be nice.
Thoughts?
Baku_The_Killer
I think it's okey, but still having problems with NCSoft to get my Grenth Costume... /agreed, for those Pre-Searing Characters that want to look cool
dr love
would be nice if they could
it's just an npc right? can't be that hard
it's just an npc right? can't be that hard
Andemius
would be a nice idea, but i think they're sorting out bigger things atm
/agree
/agree
drunk n angry
i disagree in my opinion i think it would ruin the pre experience. you dont want to see people running around in pre with "elite" looking anything. its pre for pete's sake.
/notsigned.
and for the record i own both costumes.
/notsigned.
and for the record i own both costumes.
REDdelver
It obviously has no effect on the game, so there really shouldn't be a problem. Pre is about enjoying the scenery game wise and enjoying its own lil niche community, which consists pretty much of hanging out in town
If people want to wear costumes...I'd support it.
/signed
P.S. If you want to use there shouldnt be anything "elite" in pre thought process..... Then lvl 20 shouldnt be available and with it obviously the title.
If people want to wear costumes...I'd support it.
/signed
P.S. If you want to use there shouldnt be anything "elite" in pre thought process..... Then lvl 20 shouldnt be available and with it obviously the title.
Eragon Zarroc
/signed hats ftw
Malla13
/signed
My ranger girl would love pretty things to wear around town.
My ranger girl would love pretty things to wear around town.
Welthas
/signed
won't happen but it would be amazing.
won't happen but it would be amazing.
x sithis x
i would rather have them spend time on skill update then lettin pre have pointless costumes that are more common then monks with obi
rick1027
not that i care if they do but ill /sign
Marty Silverblade
It should just be a matter of putting one NPC in Ascalon City. That'll only take a few mins. Given that there are so many people with perma pre characters, it'd be a nice addition.
Ayuhmii Shanbwa
/sign i just love pre sear, and its now a part of the game, cuz of the title and charr items
Shayne Hawke
Festivals do not take place in pre-Searing, and thus I see no reason to add NPCs for handing out festival gear.
Owik Gall
Pre is meant for players to start off and then LEAVE to the real game. Not that I wouldn't mind this, though, but I am familiar with some of anets intentions for some things. This idea would go against one of them.
End
The Drunkard
/notsigned
Let's leave pre as a tutorial instead of trying to make it the actual game.
Let's leave pre as a tutorial instead of trying to make it the actual game.
Chop it Off
I for one do not understand why this hasnt happened yet, and would love to see it happen.
/signed.
/signed.
jazilla
/signed! make it so.
Dark Morelia
/signed.
______
______
I Am The Fear
/signed I always thought they should have one
epervier
I'm tired that all of the male rangers look nearly exactly the same! lets allow some personallity and uniqueness for our characters.
/signed!
edit: The only way this idea would work is that Ascalon City in post-searing ALSO got this update. Otherwise, when a character sears, they'll no longer be able to change costumes until they reach Lion's Arch. And that would piss me off.
Thanks, Mike.
/signed!
edit: The only way this idea would work is that Ascalon City in post-searing ALSO got this update. Otherwise, when a character sears, they'll no longer be able to change costumes until they reach Lion's Arch. And that would piss me off.
Thanks, Mike.
Erasculio
At his wiki page, John Stumme mentioned he would like to see a poll about whether people would mind having a costume maker in Pre-Searing. Since he's the main GW1 designer, I think it's a good idea to make such poll. The admins will add the poll itself here sortly, but in the mean time the options would be:
1) I would like costume makers in Pre-Searing.
2) I wouldn't use them, but I wouldn't be bothered if they were added.
3) I think ArenaNet should not add costume makers to Pre-Searing.
Erasculio
1) I would like costume makers in Pre-Searing.
2) I wouldn't use them, but I wouldn't be bothered if they were added.
3) I think ArenaNet should not add costume makers to Pre-Searing.
Erasculio
Pleikki
Sure why not, i dont see any problem on adding em for pre also? would be cool lil add for pre i guess with all the other things theyve added recently
cosyfiep
since JOHN asked ---I added the poll (crude answers, but hey its my first poll )
and yeah I would like to see a costume maker in pre since they never plan to fix my necro's clipping armor issues!
and yeah I would like to see a costume maker in pre since they never plan to fix my necro's clipping armor issues!
Neo Nugget
Quote:
i disagree in my opinion i think it would ruin the pre experience. you dont want to see people running around in pre with "elite" looking anything. its pre for pete's sake.
|
/signed
AngelWJedi
/signed
it doesnt hurt the game play in pre. would be nice to be able to get costumes so i can stop seeing clones of myself walking around. and what makes you think they didnt have parties in pre? from what i can remember it was kinda peaceful and a happy time then until the searing.
it doesnt hurt the game play in pre. would be nice to be able to get costumes so i can stop seeing clones of myself walking around. and what makes you think they didnt have parties in pre? from what i can remember it was kinda peaceful and a happy time then until the searing.
Hobbs
Xslash
/signed.
i want to know about the ppl who voted no.
would you vote no to all costumes anywhere?
have you purchased any costumes?
because it seems like, if you pay $10 or w/e for a costume, u'd want to use it as often as possible.
my assumption is people that don't have the costume and don't like other people having stuff they don't have are the ppl that vote no.
i want to know about the ppl who voted no.
would you vote no to all costumes anywhere?
have you purchased any costumes?
because it seems like, if you pay $10 or w/e for a costume, u'd want to use it as often as possible.
my assumption is people that don't have the costume and don't like other people having stuff they don't have are the ppl that vote no.
MithranArkanere
Many People like to roleplay in Pre.
Costumes and masks help people disguise, and that helps roleplaying.
And the only costume that is has some... 'lore incosistencies' is the White Mantle one, although the White Mantle was established before the Searing, it's not likely they ever got to Ascalon, but seeing as collectors have Krytan armor, they perfectly could.
The rest are rather generic.
The gods where known before the Searing.
The mad king, undead and liches (like Palawa Joko) existed before the searing.
Weddings could have perfectly being a common thing in Ascalon for a long time.
As for the shinning blade costume, the emblem is quite subtle, disguised as a dagger-brooch.
The only reasons I can think against it are not lore reasons.
Only motivations from envy against those that have them, a tantrum against ANet for not doing the things they want, being a retrogade that is against any and all changes that differ from the GW of 2005 (the kind of guy that was against Nicholas Sandford and the new drops from charr), or just plain malice.
Costumes and masks help people disguise, and that helps roleplaying.
And the only costume that is has some... 'lore incosistencies' is the White Mantle one, although the White Mantle was established before the Searing, it's not likely they ever got to Ascalon, but seeing as collectors have Krytan armor, they perfectly could.
The rest are rather generic.
The gods where known before the Searing.
The mad king, undead and liches (like Palawa Joko) existed before the searing.
Weddings could have perfectly being a common thing in Ascalon for a long time.
As for the shinning blade costume, the emblem is quite subtle, disguised as a dagger-brooch.
The only reasons I can think against it are not lore reasons.
Only motivations from envy against those that have them, a tantrum against ANet for not doing the things they want, being a retrogade that is against any and all changes that differ from the GW of 2005 (the kind of guy that was against Nicholas Sandford and the new drops from charr), or just plain malice.
RedDog91
Erasculio
Quote:
since JOHN asked ---I added the poll (crude answers, but hey its my first poll )
|
Erasculio
cosyfiep
sorry....but I do believe that people have been replying with information about whether they believe it would bother them as well.
Sir Mad
/not signed
Looking like a newb is one of the things I enjoy the most in Pre. I don't want my precious to become a fashion parade.
Looking like a newb is one of the things I enjoy the most in Pre. I don't want my precious to become a fashion parade.
Lasai
Quote:
/signed.
i want to know about the ppl who voted no. would you vote no to all costumes anywhere? have you purchased any costumes? because it seems like, if you pay $10 or w/e for a costume, u'd want to use it as often as possible. my assumption is people that don't have the costume and don't like other people having stuff they don't have are the ppl that vote no. |
However, the rage from those who just have to have 6-7 identical toons from multiple accts standing around would be amusing.
Shadow Sentinel
+1 to the previous post.
I have all the costumes, and I don't want to see them in Pre. Ironically, before I had the costumes, I would have liked to see them around.
Pre is getting Postified enough (too much) as it is. And as someone else mentioned, there aren't costume or hat guys in Post-searing Ascalon either.
Besides, how could I show off my '250K armor' in Pre if it's covered up?
I have all the costumes, and I don't want to see them in Pre. Ironically, before I had the costumes, I would have liked to see them around.
Pre is getting Postified enough (too much) as it is. And as someone else mentioned, there aren't costume or hat guys in Post-searing Ascalon either.
Besides, how could I show off my '250K armor' in Pre if it's covered up?
Ascended Furling
No reason why costumes can not be in pre. I would like it verry much.
Also i want a costume maker in the guildhall and a kick hengemen from guild hall option.
We have costume makers in Shing Jea and Kamadan. No white mantle there.... so who cares. And there are all kinds of mini's that are not walking around in pre. Do they have to be removed to because some mini's dont fit in the past?
Also i want a costume maker in the guildhall and a kick hengemen from guild hall option.
We have costume makers in Shing Jea and Kamadan. No white mantle there.... so who cares. And there are all kinds of mini's that are not walking around in pre. Do they have to be removed to because some mini's dont fit in the past?
Ugh
Quote:
We have costume makers in Shing Jea and Kamadan. No white mantle there.... so who cares.
|
I don't actually care about lore or see it as a good basis for most decisions, but, if lore matters to the folks in charge, your argument is invalid.
Quote:
And there are all kinds of mini's that are not walking around in pre. Do they have to be removed to because some mini's dont fit in the past? |
Personally, I'd prefer not to have costumes because it would ruin the lovely simplicity of pre much more than minis and tonics have, and it just make it look more like post. I already hate seeing wings and flaming heads in post, so it would be even worse seeing them in pre. Festival hats wouldn't be as bad, but meh.
Also, making a bunch of dyeable things suddenly available would seriously inflate the dye economy, but whether that's a good or bad thing is subjective, I suppose.
MithranArkanere
Note that White Mantle formed at 1070, the same year when the Searing Happened.
It was not 'before they existed' it was 'around the time they were formed'.
The last Guild War ended, and then the Charr attacked Orr, Kryta and Ascalon.
And then the Searing and the Rise of the White Mantle happened, but I couldn't find which one of these two happened first.
One year later, in 1071, the Great Cataclysm happened in Arah, and in 1072 is when happens the Great Northern Wall mission.
By the time of the Great Cataclysm, the White Mantle were already in power.
It was not 'before they existed' it was 'around the time they were formed'.
The last Guild War ended, and then the Charr attacked Orr, Kryta and Ascalon.
And then the Searing and the Rise of the White Mantle happened, but I couldn't find which one of these two happened first.
One year later, in 1071, the Great Cataclysm happened in Arah, and in 1072 is when happens the Great Northern Wall mission.
By the time of the Great Cataclysm, the White Mantle were already in power.
Ugh
Quote:
Note that White Mantle formed at 1070, the same year when the Searing Happened.
It was not 'before they existed' it was 'around the time they were formed'. The last Guild War ended, and then the Charr attacked Orr, Kryta and Ascalon. And then the Searing and the Rise of the White Mantle happened, but I couldn't find which one of these two happened first. One year later, in 1071, the Great Cataclysm happened in Arah, and in 1072 is when happens the Great Northern Wall mission. By the time of the Great Cataclysm, the White Mantle were already in power. |
Quote:
White Mantle banners adorn the Citadel despite only being formed during or shortly after the searing |
Anyways, I insist that lore isn't a good basis for a decision such as this; if most people want costumes, they shouldn't be withheld if they don't fit, but costumes also shouldn't be added just because they can if they do fit. Lore is irrelevant. My problem's with Ascalon turning into an flaming, winged craphole like Kamadan or GToB. I'm some or most people would like or not mind that, though.