Showing multiple (2 or 3) titles at the same time (example pic)
NeHoMaR
My idea is quickly entering better teams in PvP (even with higher rank than mine) by showing another titles.
Plus, this could be interesting for PvE titles too, I bet everyone have more than one good title to show.
I think a maximum of 2 or 3 titles is enough, for easy read and not make your nick too big.
Archress Shayleigh
/signed
Always wanted to put my sweets title with another one... Only problem is like say in GOLEM quest/mission you are in asura territory so asura title affects, while you fight against destroyers, so if you put up your delver and asura title... yeah, small difference, but still kinda overpowered.
Always wanted to put my sweets title with another one... Only problem is like say in GOLEM quest/mission you are in asura territory so asura title affects, while you fight against destroyers, so if you put up your delver and asura title... yeah, small difference, but still kinda overpowered.
mage767
/signed
3x titles same time for pve areas.
3x titles same time for pve areas.
ZaM0
/signed x3
This could be easily avoided by allowing only one title effect to be active at once. Other question is if ANet would allocate resources to do such thing.
Quote:
/signed
Always wanted to put my sweets title with another one... Only problem is like say in GOLEM quest/mission you are in asura territory so asura title affects, while you fight against destroyers, so if you put up your delver and asura title... yeah, small difference, but still kinda overpowered. |
DigitalFear
Why? Just to show off even more?
/notsigned.
/notsigned.
Saph
Bob Slydell
Warvic
/Not signed.
I never had problems with my titles. I always wear the titles i like. And I just tell people my rank. If they don't believe me, I just show the other title. I don't think it's alot of work.
It's better then having 2 titles under your name, wich looks SUPER lame.
And I would like to them to fix the more serious things first.
I never had problems with my titles. I always wear the titles i like. And I just tell people my rank. If they don't believe me, I just show the other title. I don't think it's alot of work.
It's better then having 2 titles under your name, wich looks SUPER lame.
And I would like to them to fix the more serious things first.
Azure mist
/signed up to 2 titles.
Good idea
Good idea
Masmar
/signed
I also like how you decided to use someone elses hero rank for your pic :P
I also like how you decided to use someone elses hero rank for your pic :P
Shayne Hawke
I wouldn't mind seeing something like this, but really, if someone wants to see what other ranks you have in XYZ, just switch titles for them. Very low on the to-do list.
leetLoLa
Agar
HA is already dead because of people not taking into groups players without titles. /notsigned
Grim Aragorn
go go bigger epeen
HawkofStorms
Dabineh Deathbringer
/not signed.
It's been stated. And besides, that is why we have the KoabD title track.
It's been stated. And besides, that is why we have the KoabD title track.
MagmaRed
Even worse than the e-peen idea, this would clutter up the screen. If it was shown like you did in the example pic (which is the only way I can forsee it being done) and you were scanning a GROUP of people in a city, the names would fill the screen even faster than they do now, and I often see so many people in cities I want to click the storage box that I have to run next to it before I can target it due to all the names in the way. Would be a headache as well as an e-peen contest.
Ugh
This is the most useless suggestion I've seen in a while.
The only reason for this is e-peen.
This would cause unnecessary annoyances by crowding the screen.
Two is a weird number for something like this.
Switching titles is too simple and fast for anyone to consider it an actual inconvenience.
This could cause abuse in some areas.
Anet could prevent that abuse, but it isn't worth their time or effort.
The only reason for this is e-peen.
This would cause unnecessary annoyances by crowding the screen.
Two is a weird number for something like this.
Switching titles is too simple and fast for anyone to consider it an actual inconvenience.
This could cause abuse in some areas.
Anet could prevent that abuse, but it isn't worth their time or effort.
Dont Nerf The Perma
Unknown Duli
hehe why not be able to show all your titles then under your character name......
I could just imagine trying to locate someone in a group everyones titles stacked up....
/notsigned.. enjoy the game while it lasts
I could just imagine trying to locate someone in a group everyones titles stacked up....
/notsigned.. enjoy the game while it lasts
End
MisterB
I don't like clutter. Rather than multiple titles displayed under your character, I'd prefer alternating the titles at a fixed interval, say 2-3 seconds. Allow the user to select the titles to alternate, and it essentially automates the manual display that is possible now.
People who want to see your titles can ask you to display them, so I don't see this as a high priority.
People who want to see your titles can ask you to display them, so I don't see this as a high priority.
Pony Slaystation
/notsigned
We don't need yet another way to show off and make people's epeen bigger.
We don't need yet another way to show off and make people's epeen bigger.
Trader of Secrets
I wouldnt look at people's titles anyways, besides it just takes up more of my view as my mouse hovers over everyone.
/notsigned
/notsigned
Turbo Ginsu
Irritating enough as it is that your title's effect's don't auto-apply, this is just screen clutter, epeen waggle and a touch of laziness.
/notsigned.
/notsigned.
vBeryl
/notsigned
Is there even a reason to explain why I don't want it?
Is there even a reason to explain why I don't want it?
Hyperventilate
There are enough ways to flaunt epeen in this game, why give them another one?
/notsigned.
/notsigned.
Lord Dagon
Quote:
I don't like clutter. Rather than multiple titles displayed under your character, I'd prefer alternating the titles at a fixed interval, say 2-3 seconds. Allow the user to select the titles to alternate, and it essentially automates the manual display that is possible now.
People who want to see your titles can ask you to display them, so I don't see this as a high priority. |
/notsigned for OP's suggestion
/signed kind of halfheartedly on Mister B's idea(id vote this if anything)
Turbo Ginsu
Quote:
/signed kind of halfheartedly on Mister B's idea(id vote this if anything)
|
I'd probably sign for that.
NeHoMaR
There are plenty clear reasons of signing this, just showing more tittles.
The not signing "reasons" make no sense at all. They are just repeating exactly the same complains about the titles existence; it's just anti-title people invading my thread. I suggest you (not signing people) to make your own suggestion thread about removing the titles completely; so I can go and not sign without explain a thing.
The not signing "reasons" make no sense at all. They are just repeating exactly the same complains about the titles existence; it's just anti-title people invading my thread. I suggest you (not signing people) to make your own suggestion thread about removing the titles completely; so I can go and not sign without explain a thing.
ightgg
Yes anet obviously needs to make pve easier by letting 2 titles such as asuran/delver be active at the same time and give you both affects. Im sure pve isnt already easy enough without environmental bonus'es too? Isnt that why DoA has environmental hinders? To make an already simple Pve actually somewhat of a challenge?
/notsigned
/petitioned against
/notsigned
/petitioned against
NeHoMaR
Quote:
Yes anet obviously needs to make pve easier by letting 2 titles such as asuran/delver be active at the same time and give you both affects. Im sure pve isnt already easy enough without environmental bonus'es too? Isnt that why DoA has environmental hinders? To make an already simple Pve actually somewhat of a challenge?
/notsigned /petitioned against |
Marty Silverblade
Quote:
Well, if you carefully read my post, you can easily spot there are no suggestion about added bonus or whatever thing you are saying, that's just added speculation, so more people can make more no sense not signs.
|
Anyway, /notsigned, because:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ugh
The only reason for this is e-peen.
This would cause unnecessary annoyances by crowding the screen. Two is a weird number for something like this. Switching titles is too simple and fast for anyone to consider it an actual inconvenience. This could cause abuse in some areas. Anet could prevent that abuse, but it isn't worth their time or effort |
Turbo Ginsu
Quote:
Yes anet obviously needs to make pve easier by letting 2 titles such as asuran/delver be active at the same time and give you both affects. Im sure pve isnt already easy enough without environmental bonus'es too? Isnt that why DoA has environmental hinders? To make an already simple Pve actually somewhat of a challenge?
/notsigned /petitioned against |
Ugh
Quote:
There are plenty clear reasons of signing this, just showing more tittles.
|
Quote:
The not signing "reasons" make no sense at all. |
"The only reason for this is e-peen"
This means that this suggestion has no practical use and would only exist to make showing off twice as efficient.
"This would cause unnecessary annoyances by crowding the screen"
This means that I don't want to be forced to sift through even bigger walls of text everytime I try to find the storage chest in Kamadan.
"Two is a weird number for something like this"
It just is. Seriously, two titles? Why TWO titles? It's an awkward number. One title makes sense. And, if you're going to have more than one, you might as well just go for three instead of half-assing it. But three would be even worse than two, so let's just keep it at one.
"Switching titles is too simple and fast for anyone to consider it an actual inconvenience"
It takes about three seconds, two presses of the H key and a click. If you're unlucky, you might have to drag that little bar on the side.
"This could cause abuse in some areas"
Whoever brought this up explained it already. In case you forgot, his or her example was something about fighting Destroyers in Asuran areas.
"Anet could prevent that abuse, but it isn't worth their time or effort"
They're short on manpower already. And implementing something unnecessary isn't really worth it, especially when it creates another problem, has disadvantages, and doesn't really have any benefits.
Quote:
They are just repeating exactly the same complains about the titles existence |
Quote:
it's just anti-title people invading my thread. |
Quote:
I suggest you (not signing people) to make your own suggestion thread about removing the titles completely |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Turbo Ginsu
Likewise, popping up a title menu and swapping before a mob isn't difficult, just annoying..Though I suppose you're right, expecting GW free of annoying things is a bit silly isn't it?
|
The Drunkard
Quote:
My idea is quickly entering better teams in PvP (even with higher rank than mine) by showing another titles.
|
/notsigned
Turbo Ginsu
Yeah see. Even with my twist, it's still of negligible enough use or benefit to bother with, I can see that yeah, the asura title benefit and destroyer-hatin' deldrimor titles stacking is just a bit too much overkill, verging on exploit..
superraptors
pointless even tho some titles do matter to an extent in some formats of the game
showing off even though your still bad in the end will get you no where, from pvp perspective
no way
showing off even though your still bad in the end will get you no where, from pvp perspective
no way
Dont Nerf The Perma
Quote:
There are plenty clear reasons of signing this, just showing more tittles.
The not signing "reasons" make no sense at all. They are just repeating exactly the same complains about the titles existence; it's just anti-title people invading my thread. I suggest you (not signing people) to make your own suggestion thread about removing the titles completely; so I can go and not sign without explain a thing. |