Quote:
Originally Posted by Skyy High
So your argument is that some classes are so bad in PvE that they may as well bring an empty bar? Because I think that's BS. The difference between top-tier PvE classes and bottom tier classes (in terms of soloing with 7 heroes) is far smaller than that.
I'm saying that no class is in such a sorry state that they would "need" an update before the game is permanently taken off of support, not that "everything is golden". Do you see the difference?
|
I would love, absolutely
LOVE, if ArenaNet had
rangers actually using a bow as part of a meta build for end game at any point in time. The fail way they balanced the game to have rangers shunned or forced into bringing DwG or some other secondary garbage is BS and one of the biggest failures of GW imo. Brief windows of barrage existed but for the most part bow rangers never had a place in the end game meta and that's and absolutely pathetic reflection on the company's ability to balance a game to make it enjoyable (or in some cases, playable - as defined by an equal/close to equal chance to get into a group, for everyone no matter the class).
As far as GW:B getting more content, don't expect anything before the launch of GW2. They took the Live Team off the game earlier this year and at the rate they push out new content, even if they got moved back to GW1 today they wouldn't be able to accomplish anything meaningful. I wouldn't be surprised if they never reform once GW2 launches (despite Stumme saying he wanted to continue GW:B after GW2 launches), it seems much more profitable to put them onto GW2, especially seeing as many of the primary reasons for having them on GW1 are no longer relevant once GW2 launches. Most of the lore gaps will be filled in with text books or dialogue in GW2. Sure we won't experience them, but we will know the details of certain events taking place. To be completely honest, most of the GW:B content (especially the WiK stuff) was very light in lore value. The plot development was almost paper thin and most of the content was gameplay with little story backing it up. WoC was different (with a lot more story involved) but less directly relevant to GW2 (seeing as Cantha is closed off - although it probably offered more closure than what we would have gotten otherwise from GW2 alone).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nekodesu
I don't think they will do anything AFTER guild wars 2 is out, sadly. I don't see why they would, they seem to want to get Guild Wars to come to an end now. I haven't even done the beyond stuff for cantha, I couldn't be bothered. I don't see why there would be much story in quests that just tells us to go kill stuff, ALL THE TIME...
|
Winds of Change actually had a lot of plot and character development. It was one of the more fleshed out and story driven parts of the game.
The biggest disappointments for me are that we never got to see Ebon Hawke founded and we never got to continue the story into Ascalon. Evenia's disappearance is kind of an annoying lose thread to leave open so obviously. I wish they had managed to clear that one up before GW2 launched.
Maybe there is an opportunity to create mirrored storylines in GW1 and GW2. They want to bring in a new mystery or a new faction in GW2 and link it to the past, or flesh out its story in the world 250 years ago so they could release content in GW1 which continues to develop into content from GW2.
Regardless I think it's unlikely we will see more GW:B content, before or after GW2.